In the highlighted sentence, you explicitly say MB never claimed that the formula used was a super conductor. Now take a look at this post from Amir
http://www.whatsbestforum.com/showt...h-Other-Cables&p=413108&viewfull=1#post413108 quoting the original MB text:
Back then, I saw the exact same text as well on the website, it was later taken down, and the rest is history. Clearly, the claim was indeed about a super conductor, and apparently the same alloy used in the LHC. You are now refuting all this in an attempt to deflect, and you attempt to attribute the whole thing to the original MB language being "written poorly". Worse, you accuse those who call you on it. Fine, so be it, but you cannot tell me that "
MB never claimed that the formula used for the Ultra cable was a "Super Conductor.""
Having settled that, I also saw recent language about free radicals, etc. This misinformation - aka Fake News, aka "hype" - in the technical claims is the ONE and ONLY reason this firestorm erupted, and will continue to burn until you give up on the obfuscation and deflection - it simply fuels more of it. From my perspective, MB and its representatives have been solely responsible for this mess, which has led to misunderstandings among folks, and accusations flying all around.
If you want to keep going, my armor is on. But I suggest we stop right here, and I hope you will reflect on what's transpired and do the right thing, at least from now on.