The official audio myth busting thread

Blizzard

Banned
Sep 30, 2015
3,049
3
0
That is documented experience around here, in previous tests put up by Ethan and others. However, folks who prefer the "effect" of the LP playback system have their reasons and anyone can hear the difference I would hope. Again, perfect reproduction over two channel stereo may not "sound" as good as the extra stuff that vinyl playback adds to the mix!


This is why the digital copy will be sourced from the vinyl. So all the vinyl coloration's that make the music sound closer to the real live event, will be captured as well.
 

Blizzard

Banned
Sep 30, 2015
3,049
3
0
agreed, but if you could fade in and out it will take out a bit of extra info that when I was 20 I could hear as a difference. Think about it some my man.

That's okay because the fade ins and outs can be random. It won't matter because nobody will know which is which anyways. We only need to assure the levels are perfectly matched, and the needle drop sound isn't heard.

Anyways it's alright if we give team vinyl a few hints to make it fair. We have measurements on our side, they need something besides their ears.
 

PeterA

Well-Known Member
Dec 6, 2011
12,669
10,942
3,515
USA
I'm basing my statement on what many around here say. Never said you in particular. There seems to be a popular consensus that it takes vinyl to achieve the very best in audio. So what that means to me is if I think digital can do better, my ears must be poorly trained. Or I lack listening experience. I hear this everyday around here. Yet the same guys who say it, would never join the panel for this challenge.

I, and I'm sure Al M., would join the panel if the date and location are convenient for us and don't involve a lot of travel and expense. I appreciate that you can't refer to anyone specific who made such a statement. If it is only your impression, that can't really be questioned by others.

As far as your listening experience is concerned, and specifically with live classical music and with turntables, you showed a picture of a toy turntable and turned my questions into a joke response. So you must excuse those who, like me, have the impression that your listening experiences may be limited in those two areas because, unless I have missed it, you don't seem to discuss listening to live music, or to analog.

I should also add that a few years ago I mentioned to some of my digital friends that I might one day consider adding digital files to my audio system. At the time, I had not heard digital reproduction that satisfied me enough to add a new format. That, and cost, is why I only have analog now. As I wrote before, I am open to being convinced of digital's improvements. If I like the sound enough, I might consider adding it to my system in addition to my analog. I think you have the impression that I am entrenched and can not be convinced about digital. I hereby write that that is not the case. Time will tell.
 

Blizzard

Banned
Sep 30, 2015
3,049
3
0
I, and I'm sure Al M., would join the panel if the date and location are convenient for us and don't involve a lot of travel and expense. I appreciate that you can't refer to anyone specific who made such a statement. If it is only your impression, that can't really be questioned by others.

As far as your listening experience is concerned, and specifically with live classical music and with turntables, you showed a picture of a toy turntable and turned my questions into a joke response. So you must excuse those who, like me, have the impression that your listening experiences may be limited in those two areas because, unless I have missed it, you don't seem to discuss listening to live music, or to analog.

I should also add that a few years ago I mentioned to some of my digital friends that I might one day consider adding digital files to my audio system. At the time, I had not heard digital reproduction that satisfied me enough to add a new format. That, and cost, is why I only have analog now. As I wrote before, I am open to being convinced of digital's improvements. If I like the sound enough, I might consider adding it to my system in addition to my analog. I think you have the impression that I am entrenched and can not be convinced about digital. I hereby write that that is not the case. Time will tell.


Well it would be in the Seattle area sometime in the spring based on the vague plans we have discussed. We will also need to gather all of the necessary gear as well. I personally don't own all of the gear required.

Personally I haven't heard the best of the best turntable setups out there. So all I can go off of it what other's who have to say. What I heard in the morning today didn't sound like the top vinyl was a clear winner vs the Merging NADAC. David robinson and Jan Eric Persson felt the same vs the R2R. Either way I have no interest in technology from the last century, as it's definitely not the future. I'm more interested in what will be the hot tech in audio 5-10 years from now, rather than 30-50 years ago.
 

PeterA

Well-Known Member
Dec 6, 2011
12,669
10,942
3,515
USA
Before it's even worthwhile to make the plans, we need to assemble a panel of vinyl diehards willing to volunteer their services in the name of better audio for all. Once we have that in place, we can move forward with the arrangements. But keep in mind, the panel will need to consist of audiophiles well known for their opinion of vinyl being superior to digital for this to be worthwhile.

Would it not make more sense to set up the challenge, at least as a planned event, with a specific location and time and then invite individuals to attend? It does not seem relevant to know who is coming beforehand in order to set up the venue and test procedures. You just need a host and people to supply the needed gear. I'm sure there are plenty of people who know how to listen to both analog and digital in the Seattle area. Perhaps even some musicians. Why do you think they need to be "trained" listeners. Harmon does not seem to use trained listeners exclusively for their testing.
 

Al M.

VIP/Donor
Sep 10, 2013
8,813
4,556
1,213
Greater Boston
I should also add that a few years ago I mentioned to some of my digital friends that I might one day consider adding digital files to my audio system. At the time, I had not heard digital reproduction that satisfied me enough to add a new format. That, and cost, is why I only have analog now. As I wrote before, I am open to being convinced of digital's improvements. If I like the sound enough, I might consider adding it to my system in addition to my analog. I think you have the impression that I am entrenched and can not be convinced about digital. I hereby write that that is not the case. Time will tell.

And I can attest to Peter's openmindedness. When Peter heard the dCS Vivaldi in the same session as I did he was deeply impressed and said that the experience completely changed his outlook on what digital can do, and that at this level of reproduction the format, analog or digital, did not seem to matter as much anymore.
 

Blizzard

Banned
Sep 30, 2015
3,049
3
0
Would it not make more sense to set up the challenge, at least as a planned event, with a specific location and time and then invite individuals to attend? It does not seem relevant to know who is coming beforehand in order to set up the venue and test procedures. You just need a host and people to supply the needed gear. I'm sure there are plenty of people who know how to listen to both analog and digital in the Seattle area. Perhaps even some musicians. Why do you think they need to be "trained" listeners. Harmon does not seem to use trained listeners exclusively for their testing.


If nobody's going to come anyways, what's the point of organizing such an elaborate event. They need to be "known vinyl enthusiasts" the kind of guys who people look up to and trust as true golden ears. You don't understand why this is important? We need people with strong opposing views as explained in post #1 of this thread.
 

NorthStar

Member
Feb 8, 2011
24,305
1,323
435
Vancouver Island, B.C. Canada
Bob, this is patently untrue. Ethan was banned in 2014 for repeated violations of the TOS. Please refrain from providing misleading information.

Lee

I was just humorous Lee. And I made sure of that...with the proper smiley.

And it is tough for anyone, any human being when stressed a little, to remain calm, with a good sense of humor, @ all times, when often insulted, ...it makes for an easy prey.
We often see the faults in people, more than the qualities. A balancing judgement with genuine human compassion is a rare commodity in man's history.
I am speaking generally, and about any life's avenues. I am not thinking about here, but life in general.
 

NorthStar

Member
Feb 8, 2011
24,305
1,323
435
Vancouver Island, B.C. Canada
Who are the true masters of audio? The self-proclaimed ones?

Me, Me, Me!!! I don't know why I have to keep saying it....

Hehe. Thanks for a good laugh!

You can say that; nice to laugh openly and from the heart honestly. :D

* No insult directed towards you Amir; you are still my number one audio master guru in my book.
It's just that my book has minimal audience. :b
 

Mike Lavigne

Member Sponsor & WBF Founding Member
Apr 25, 2010
12,602
11,695
4,410
If nobody's going to come anyways, what's the point of organizing such an elaborate event. They need to be "known vinyl enthusiasts" the kind of guys who people look up to and trust as true golden ears. You don't understand why this is important? We need people with strong opposing views as explained in post #1 of this thread.

Blizzard/Mike,

if you are looking for buy-in for your agenda from a group you have continually antagonized time and time again, then that is a bit naïve I think. sure; there are those here who love that you poke the bear so to speak, but my guess is that hard core analog lovers have little interest in getting involved with you as things currently stand. if you really want that to change, then you need to pull in your fangs a bit and be more considerate and respectful in how you interact. recognize the limitations of your own experience if that is possible. qualify some of your 'proclamations'.

I speak for no one but myself on this, and am only guessing how other vinyl folk (known vinyl enthusiasts) feel.

when you approach people with such strong clear agendas and attitudes then who wants to get involved with that. any 'event' would have winners and losers, finger pointing and excuse making, as opposed to learning.

my feelings are that this post's message will go in one ear and out the other and not even register in your mind. but i thought it was worth at least one shot. I'm all for fun audio/music events when there is a spirit of common ground, not open warfare.
 

Geardaddy

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2012
523
2
930
Charlotte, NC
Well, my predictions are people WILL NOT be able to tell the difference between analog and a digital recording of the analog device, whatever it is, and it won't even take quad DSD to achieve it. In the short term...

BUT, the issue is more likely with longer term listening and fatigue issues. My theory is that digital results in more agitation of the nervous system and the biggest difference is in the way your body, nervous system and mind react to the sensory input over time.

Therefore, we may need to measure brain activity of the listener between analog and digital as well. Any brain research scientists here? :)

+1...that is why I referenced the German study....
 

NorthStar

Member
Feb 8, 2011
24,305
1,323
435
Vancouver Island, B.C. Canada
Can someone locate the thread where Bruce B. (pro recordist) Gary K. (pro speaker designer), and jazdoc assembled together @ Mike Lavigne's ultra audiophile home for a music listening session in comparing open-real tapes, crystal discs (from Gary), LPs, SACDs, high res audio files (from Bruce)...so from both Sota analog and digital rigs?

The winners were 1. Analog R2R tapes and followed closely by 2. LPs. But some of the high res audio files (Bruce provided few @ various res and 2xDSD recordings) were sounding real good too, and so Gary's crystal discs (@ $1,600 a pop for some of them...if my memory is close enough).

And Mike Lavigne has a top-notch analog and digital rigs. That thread was one of the most interesting ones to me here @ WBF. I trust all these high caliber gentlemen.

@ the end all these audio formats, analog and digital, sound phenomenally excellent, when well mastered and recorded from some of the best in the business and with the best tools and right dose of EQ. ...The master tapes are usually the best sounding, but those you cannot buy @ your local amazon audio store...you need connections from the underworld.
And cost could be well prohibitive for most (even for the well high heeled ones).
But cost wasn't the objective; best sound was.

Yeah, I would like to locate that thread...

___________

? http://www.whatsbestforum.com/showt...enesis-Speaker&p=219787&viewfull=1#post219787
?? http://www.theabsolutesound.com/articles/the-2000-cd-made-from-glass-1/
??? http://www.whatsbestforum.com/showt...-or-will-there-appear-better-masterings-on-it
???? http://tapeproject.com/testimonials/
????? http://www.whatsbestforum.com/showt...enesis-Speaker&p=219732&viewfull=1#post219732 ===> The evaluation results (page 31, post #309) | start

<<<•>>> That's the thread: http://www.whatsbestforum.com/showt...-Disc-US-1600-was-played-with-Genesis-Speaker
 
Last edited:

amirm

Banned
Apr 2, 2010
15,813
38
0
Seattle, WA
Blizzard/Mike,

if you are looking for buy-in for your agenda from a group you have continually antagonized time and time again, then that is a bit naïve I think. sure; there are those here who love that you poke the bear so to speak, but my guess is that hard core analog lovers have little interest in getting involved with you as things currently stand. if you really want that to change, then you need to pull in your fangs a bit and be more considerate and respectful in how you interact. recognize the limitations of your own experience if that is possible. qualify some of your 'proclamations'.

I speak for no one but myself on this, and am only guessing how other vinyl folk (known vinyl enthusiasts) feel.

when you approach people with such strong clear agendas and attitudes then who wants to get involved with that. any 'event' would have winners and losers, finger pointing and excuse making, as opposed to learning.

my feelings are that this post's message will go in one ear and out the other and not even register in your mind. but i thought it was worth at least one shot. I'm all for fun audio/music events when there is a spirit of common ground, not open warfare.
There are good points in what you say MileL so I want to make sure it doesn't get ignored too quickly.

Blizzard, I think you are not going to find willing people for reasons Mike mentions. Our best bet is to work with people who are not so emotional about this topic and are interested in investigation. And me...
 

Geardaddy

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2012
523
2
930
Charlotte, NC
Two vexing anecdotes from two well known audio reviewers:

1. Vinyl rip to 24/192 hi rez PCM indistinguishable: http://www.stereophile.com/content/ayre-acoustics-qa-9-usb-ad-converter-page-3#HGVQ6UFIlZhobbQ0.97

I tried a variety of sample rates with these LP rips: 44.1kHz was very good, but didn't capture the essence of the original LPs' sounds; 96kHz was better; but there was no doubt that with a 192kHz sample rate I could not distinguish between the LP and the digital rip. And believe me, I tried. I A/B'd the two versions until blood came out of my ears and I was heartily sick of this music I hadn't heard for, in some cases, decades. When, in An Oxford Elegy, John Westbrook declaimed "Come, let me read the oft-read tale again . . ." for what must have been the tenth time, I felt like screaming "No! Don't read it again!"
Read more at http://www.stereophile.com/content/ayre-acoustics-qa-9-usb-ad-converter-page-3#hUokMqezHd0HeaIM.99


2. R2R rip to Quad SDS also indistinguishable: http://positive-feedback.com/audio-discourse/impressions-the-merging-technology-nadac-mc-8-dsd-dac/

The results were remarkable. In direct A/B testing, source against Quad DSD, I really could not tell the difference between the two. Nor could Jan-Eric Persson, who heard my DSD transfer of his tape at RMAF 2013. "That's my tape!" he cried, when he heard it in the PF hospitality room. (He's right, you know.)

The experience of playing back those transfers via the NADAC recreates the experience of hearing them with the Horus ADDA: The very tape itself.
 

Blizzard

Banned
Sep 30, 2015
3,049
3
0
Blizzard/Mike,

if you are looking for buy-in for your agenda from a group you have continually antagonized time and time again, then that is a bit naïve I think. sure; there are those here who love that you poke the bear so to speak, but my guess is that hard core analog lovers have little interest in getting involved with you as things currently stand. if you really want that to change, then you need to pull in your fangs a bit and be more considerate and respectful in how you interact. recognize the limitations of your own experience if that is possible. qualify some of your 'proclamations'.

I speak for no one but myself on this, and am only guessing how other vinyl folk (known vinyl enthusiasts) feel.

when you approach people with such strong clear agendas and attitudes then who wants to get involved with that. any 'event' would have winners and losers, finger pointing and excuse making, as opposed to learning.

my feelings are that this post's message will go in one ear and out the other and not even register in your mind. but i thought it was worth at least one shot. I'm all for fun audio/music events when there is a spirit of common ground, not open warfare.

Sounds like a cop out if I've ever heard one. Bock bock bock!! :)
 

Blizzard

Banned
Sep 30, 2015
3,049
3
0
There are good points in what you say MileL so I want to make sure it doesn't get ignored too quickly.

Blizzard, I think you are not going to find willing people for reasons Mike mentions. Our best bet is to work with people who are not so emotional about this topic and are interested in investigation. And me...

This isn't about emotion to me Amir. I have no emotional attachment to format's. To me it's about the music, sound quality and convenience in which I can enjoy it. Of course cost comes into play as well. If I can get the sound of a $150K vinyl rig out of a $4200 DAC, then even if it was as much of a pain in the ass as vinyl is, I would go for it.
 

NorthStar

Member
Feb 8, 2011
24,305
1,323
435
Vancouver Island, B.C. Canada

Bruce B

WBF Founding Member, Pro Audio Production Member
Apr 25, 2010
7,007
515
1,740
Snohomish, WA
www.pugetsoundstudios.com
Sounds like a cop out if I've ever heard one. Bock bock bock!! :)

Really Mike? If you're going to act like an ass, then count me out. I was going to let you use all the equipment necessary to capture all the data.
 

Blizzard

Banned
Sep 30, 2015
3,049
3
0
Two vexing anecdotes from two well known audio reviewers:

1. Vinyl rip to 24/192 hi rez PCM indistinguishable: http://www.stereophile.com/content/ayre-acoustics-qa-9-usb-ad-converter-page-3#HGVQ6UFIlZhobbQ0.97




2. R2R rip to Quad SDS also indistinguishable: http://positive-feedback.com/audio-discourse/impressions-the-merging-technology-nadac-mc-8-dsd-dac/


But were those guys self proclaimed "real vinyl enthusiasts"?

And if you're an studio engineer, that disqualifies you because that means you're in the pro sound camp, and every audiophile, especially vinyl enthusiast knows that the recording engineers, and anyone related to the "pro sound world, is clueless when it comes to what "home based self proclaimed golden eared vinyl enthusiasts" know.

Once that recording leaves the master tape, theres so many super expensive ways that can make the data far superior to the source. Didn't you know??
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Co-Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing