OK, maybe they are not disruptive.
I don't think disruptive is totally a black and white thing - there are shades of grey in disruptiveness (or should that be disruptivity?). They are kinda disruptive, but not totally.
But, slightly off topice, don'tyou think that if they put a half inch faceplate on their stuff they could be selling directly in the high end market right now, and at current high end prices....there specs, anyway, and looks, are pretty dang good.
No, I don't think they could because they're not playing the game. By which I mean they're cutting out the middle men and so won't be considered 'credible players'. Remember to get to true 'high end' status in the current market you'd need to get a positive review in the gatekeeper press. Stereophile for one requires that its available in a certain minimum number of dealers - how does a direct operation get to jump through that hoop?
Isn't their price, their lack of thick metal ,and perhaps then equipped thusly, a great review in TAS and , bang, off to the races and high profits. Is high end mostly now just bling.....rhetoric question methinks, atleast as far as electronics goes pretty much.
They don't actually look the part for what high end buyers want, as you've noticed. If they changed the faceplate that would make them unacceptable for the value-conscious market because it would increase the price unacceptably, so no its not just about giving it 12mm depth of machined metal as a fascia and heavy duty grab handles. The product is designed for a particular market and its suiting that market pretty well, but its not high-end.
As regards bling, yes the market is now mostly bling, but that's the dying market, not the coming market. If they addressed a dying market with a new product, that's a recipe for quick extinction. There is still a baby in there, even though at present its mainly bathwater.