THE Show Report

andromedaaudio

VIP/Donor
Jan 23, 2011
8,495
2,843
1,400
Amsterdam holland
Great pics , would have liked to hear the sme and the clearaudio on the sonusfaber system.
Cool design by scaena .
Great looking amp/tube design of NAT /great room .
And i would like to have heard the YG s and some more speakers .
The NVS turntable /arm looks stunning

If you put the ARC gear on magico , magico might get the better response is my idea .
A lot of audiophiles like the romantic voluptuos , big soundstage arc sound .
hj
 
Last edited:

KeithR

VIP/Donor
May 7, 2010
5,174
2,864
1,898
Encino, CA
On the many occasions that I have heard Focal speaker's, I could never tell whether they would sound great or terrible. They seem to be EXTREMELY room dependent and ancillary gear is paramount in their presentation. ( IMO,more so than most any other speaker!).
Several years ago, I heard a Focal set up that was IMO at that time best sound at the show...since then they seem to have lost their way.:(

Davey- what were your thoughts on the Ref 75?

I really came in expecting to write a check at the end of the show, but didn't.
 

DaveyF

Well-Known Member
Jul 31, 2010
6,129
181
458
La Jolla, Calif USA
Keith, I have resisted posting about the Ref 75 so far, as I am of two minds about this amp.

The first room that I visited when I went to THE show was the ARC room wherein Dave Gordon was holding court. I have talked to Dave on many occasions and we generally agree on most things a'phile. This time, I went into the room and Dave immediately described to me his thoughts on the Ref75. I proceeded to listen and essentially agreed with Dave's comments.
Firstly, the room was not ideal at all for their set-up. The Sophia's didn't seem to be particularly well placed in the room and the room was stark and a little sterile. Dave told me that this Ref75 was a prototype which they had hastily cobbled together for the show, even leaving wires exposed on the rear.
My impressions of the amp are as follows, BUT with the proviso that this amp and more importantly the sound in this room, may not have been indicative of what one could ultimately expect....
The system sounded a tad dry and sterile, with a certain 'digital' hardness that I wasn't sure one could lay at the amp's feet. The amp seemed to have plenty of steam for the speakers and wasn't seeming to strain in any way. OTOH, I did feel that like Keith said, there was a certain lack of midrange splendor that would begin to concern me after extended listening. Dave told me that he also heard this BUT attributed it to the room, which I would give him the benefit of the doubt on.
To those people who are still deriding my D70 Mk2, believe this or not, Dave feels like I do about this amp and considers it one of their greatest efforts. IMO, the Ref75( at least the one that i heard at the show and in the show conditions) couldn't, and didn't, hold a candle to the older design.
Would the fact that the newer amps utilize ss in their regulation be a factor, Dave and I believe that is possible....however, as Dave argues and I wouldn't disagree here either, the tube regulation can be a lot more unreliable....BUT if you are after the magic midrange:D
 
Last edited:

microstrip

VIP/Donor
May 30, 2010
20,807
4,702
2,790
Portugal
(...) To those people who are still deriding my D70 Mk2, believe this or not, Dave feels like I do about this amp and considers it one of their greatest efforts. IMO, the Ref75( at least the one that i heard at the show and in the show conditions) couldn't, and didn't, hold a candle to the older design.
Would the fact that the newer amps utilize ss in their regulation be a factor, Dave and I believe that is possible....however, as Dave argues and I wouldn't disagree here either, the tube regulation can be a lot more unreliable....BUT if you are after the magic midrange:D

DaveyF,

I do not deride your D70 mk2 - having owned one I understand your views. However, I am not only looking for magic midrange - I want magic fullrange!

BTW, the most brilliant and innovative part of the circuit of the great D70 was the cathode coupled cross connection of the drivers, already used in the D79, as it allows symmetrical feedback in the amplifier. Although it has some tube regulation in the power supply, the input section and drivers use final solid state regulation, the tubes are used for screen regulation and as a pre-regulator.
 

AudioExplorations

New Member
Apr 5, 2012
653
5
0
Keith - I have never figured out how to audition most electronics at shows - particularly amps. I'm in a room I've never been in with (typically) a combination of products I either never heard or heard together with some cables I've never used. How do I isolate the amp sound (which I have also never heard) from all of the other variables? Just curious.

IMO it is very difficult/impossible to get a meaningful impressions of equipment at shows. There are too many variables at play and some rooms are impossible to work with so even great gear is doomed from the start. I personally don't take any show impressions too seriously. The only time I post listening impressions of equipment is when I change something out in my own system which I am intimately familiar with, and even this is likely not meaningful to others as it is impossible to rule out personal subjectivity and influence of other components in the chain. I think reviews are good to get a general impression of a component (continuities in multiple different reviews), which can then be used to shortlist components to try out at home. Unfortunately home demo's are a hassle to arrange and come with some sort of obligation to the dealer.
 

DaveyF

Well-Known Member
Jul 31, 2010
6,129
181
458
La Jolla, Calif USA
DaveyF,

I do not deride your D70 mk2 - having owned one I understand your views. However, I am not only looking for magic midrange - I want magic fullrange!
.

Micro, obviously, I agree with you that we all are seeking magic full range. However, IF I have to choose between full range but NO magic ( which a large number of the current amps display, IMO) and magic midrange, I know which one I am going for.:)
 

microstrip

VIP/Donor
May 30, 2010
20,807
4,702
2,790
Portugal
IMO it is very difficult/impossible to get a meaningful impressions of equipment at shows. There are too many variables at play and some rooms are impossible to work with so even great gear is doomed from the start. I personally don't take any show impressions too seriously. (...)

I agree with you and have posted similar comments before. However, if the sound is exceptionally good and some aspects are outstanding systematically with several recordings it has a meaning - the equipment involved must be of very good quality. In this case I take it seriously, as it shows me the capabilities of sound reproduction when the system is optimally set up.

IMHO, 95% of the success in a show is due to the demonstrator choosing the appropriate recordings for the particular system/room and specially not allowing users to bring their suspicious favorites!
 

AudioExplorations

New Member
Apr 5, 2012
653
5
0
I agree with you and have posted similar comments before. However, if the sound is exceptionally good and some aspects are outstanding systematically with several recordings it has a meaning - the equipment involved must be of very good quality. In this case I take it seriously, as it shows me the capabilities of sound reproduction when the system is optimally set up.

IMHO, 95% of the success in a show is due to the demonstrator choosing the appropriate recordings for the particular system/room and specially not allowing users to bring their suspicious favorites!

That is to me the ultimate test; a good system should work well on ALL recordings/genres.
 

MylesBAstor

Well-Known Member
Apr 20, 2010
11,238
81
1,725
New York City
That is to me the ultimate test; a good system should work well on ALL recordings/genres.

I'm not sure what you mean by that. A system should demonstrate the differences between recordings and not filter it thru rose colored glasses. Ergo, if it's a bad recording, it's a bad recording. If it's a great recording, it's a great recording. If they all sound the same, then something's amiss.
 

MarinJim

New Member
Feb 2, 2011
888
2
0
I'm not sure what you mean by that. A system should demonstrate the differences between recordings and not filter it thru rose colored glasses. Ergo, if it's a bad recording, it's a bad recording. If it's a great recording, it's a great recording. If they all sound the same, then something's amiss.

Very true. Crap in, crap out, or genius in, genius out. A system should be a chameleon of the source.
 

AudioExplorations

New Member
Apr 5, 2012
653
5
0
I'm not sure what you mean by that. A system should demonstrate the differences between recordings and not filter it thru rose colored glasses. Ergo, if it's a bad recording, it's a bad recording. If it's a great recording, it's a great recording. If they all sound the same, then something's amiss.

Yes complete neutrality should be the goal and the gear should get out of the way to let the musicians do the magic. What I meant was more referring to genre's; a good system should be able to do it all, not just wow the crowd with a solo vocal track.
 

Mike Lavigne

Member Sponsor & WBF Founding Member
Apr 25, 2010
12,601
11,693
4,410
Sunday at Newport with the Count

I agree with you and have posted similar comments before. However, if the sound is exceptionally good and some aspects are outstanding systematically with several recordings it has a meaning - the equipment involved must be of very good quality. In this case I take it seriously, as it shows me the capabilities of sound reproduction when the system is optimally set up.

IMHO, 95% of the success in a show is due to the demonstrator choosing the appropriate recordings for the particular system/room and specially not allowing users to bring their suspicious favorites!

Sunday morning at the show Joel Durand removed the Telos tonarm and Anna cartridge from the NVS in the Blue Light Audio room since he had to bug out early. i had hung out in that room a good deal.....and played vinyl mostly when i was DJ'ing. one track i use at home and jtinn brought with him is 'Snooky' from the Pablo pressing of "Mostly Blues.....and Some Others", Count Basie and the Kansas City Septem. this has the Count with Eddie 'Lockjaw' Davis, Snooky Young, Freddie Green, Joe Pass, John Heard, and Roy McCurdy. i had played that cut 5 or 6 times over a couple of days in the Blue Light Audio room (and likely 50 times in my room at home on the same vinyl front end). it has some amazing cymbles with tons of detail, as well as a very dynamic muted horn and it is perfectly recorded. and since jtinn no longer had a need for his Lp that day and i had a few hours until i had to go to the airport, i decided to take it around to the rooms i had visited with tt's and play it. i especially had interest in how the Lyra Atlas and Clearaudio Goldfinger Statement might do as those were two cartridges that people had asked me about what i thought.

i did visit 10 rooms and play that cut. and it was an eye-openning experience. it's important to note that very little truth can be uncovered in an exercise such as this. it's simply one data point. and a heavily qualified data point at that. and it's also fair to say that i could have had a strong expectation bias....or not.

i could try and tell the whole story, but since my notes are at home and i don't want to rely totally on my 60 year old memory, i'll try to post later tonight about what i heard. sorry about the tease.

the comments about 'appropriate recordings' for particular rooms prompted me to bring this up. i'm not sure i buy into that......but i will say that particular recordings do highlight strengths of particular systems. and also that the ultra-detail on 'Snooky' did separate the men from the boys on this Sunday afternoon. some could do it, and others not so much. and $$$$'s did not entirely explain it.
 

MylesBAstor

Well-Known Member
Apr 20, 2010
11,238
81
1,725
New York City
Yes complete neutrality should be the goal and the gear should get out of the way to let the musicians do the magic. What I meant was more referring to genre's; a good system should be able to do it all, not just wow the crowd with a solo vocal track.

OK I see what you mean. Too many want just euphonic colorations so everything sounds nice. Like the early SE amps.
 

MylesBAstor

Well-Known Member
Apr 20, 2010
11,238
81
1,725
New York City
the comments about 'appropriate recordings' for particular rooms prompted me to bring this up. i'm not sure i buy into that......but i will say that particular recordings do highlight strengths of particular systems. and also that the ultra-detail on 'Snooky' did separate the men from the boys on this Sunday afternoon. some could do it, and others not so much. and $$$$'s did not entirely explain it.

Absolutely! Did the same thing at RMAF last year with Mallets, Melody and Mayhem. The recording sounded dramatically different on each system. In fact on some ne plus systems, the magic of the recording, let's say overtones and sense of space around instruments, was simply MIA.
 

Mike Lavigne

Member Sponsor & WBF Founding Member
Apr 25, 2010
12,601
11,693
4,410
Sunday morning at the show Joel Durand removed the Telos tonarm and Anna cartridge from the NVS in the Blue Light Audio room since he had to bug out early. i had hung out in that room a good deal.....and played vinyl mostly when i was DJ'ing. one track i use at home and jtinn brought with him is 'Snooky' from the Pablo pressing of "Mostly Blues.....and Some Others", Count Basie and the Kansas City Septem. this has the Count with Eddie 'Lockjaw' Davis, Snooky Young, Freddie Green, Joe Pass, John Heard, and Roy McCurdy. i had played that cut 5 or 6 times over a couple of days in the Blue Light Audio room (and likely 50 times in my room at home on the same vinyl front end). it has some amazing cymbles with tons of detail, as well as a very dynamic muted horn and it is perfectly recorded. and since jtinn no longer had a need for his Lp that day and i had a few hours until i had to go to the airport, i decided to take it around to the rooms i had visited with tt's and play it. i especially had interest in how the Lyra Atlas and Clearaudio Goldfinger Statement might do as those were two cartridges that people had asked me about what i thought.

i did visit 11 rooms and play that cut. and it was an eye-openning experience. it's important to note that very little truth can be uncovered in an exercise such as this. it's simply one data point. and a heavily qualified data point at that. and it's also fair to say that i could have had a strong expectation bias....or not.

i could try and tell the whole story, but since my notes are at home and i don't want to rely totally on my 60 year old memory, i'll try to post later tonight about what i heard. sorry about the tease.

the comments about 'appropriate recordings' for particular rooms prompted me to bring this up. i'm not sure i buy into that......but i will say that particular recordings do highlight strengths of particular systems. and also that the ultra-detail on 'Snooky' did separate the men from the boys on this Sunday afternoon. some could do it, and others not so much. and $$$$'s did not entirely explain it.

before i get into my perceptions about how each room and system did with 'Snooky' i will acknowledge the obvious. beyond all the varibles of a show and the rooms, are the varibles and level of competent set-up of the turntables, and particularly synergy and compatablity of the tt, arm, cartridge, and phono stage....even the rack it sits on. rooms and systems are many times put together around who will pay for part of the expense, or who will offer to contribute gear......not what specific gear actually works best or what gear the set-up guy has most experience with.

i just don't want to cause undue negativity to any piece of gear based on my particular perceptions. OTOH i have played this cut in my system on a number of different turntables, arms, cartidges and thru different phono stages which were set up pretty good. and even thru my observations of the Durand tonearm development.....so i do have some sense of how things ought to be even with varible gear.

here we go ranked #1 thru #11;

(1) Blue Light Audio room. #418. Evolution Acoustics-darTZeel, NVS-Telos-Ortofon Anna. as set up by Joel Durand, this system (even with $2500 EA speakers) portrayed Snooky in all it's glory. no it's not fully my home system completely. but it gets the energy and full spacial rendering of the cymbals, you get the distinctive metallic shimmer, the precise rendering of all the tiny detail and complete decay. at one point in the cut, the Cymbals change from a hi-hat to a splash type and this room/system captures it completely. the muted horn is alive and vibrant. overall there is an immediacy and life to the music. it's alive. the speakers completely disappear and every molecule in the room is music.

(2) Lotus-Esoteric-SMc room--#323 in the Atrium. Joe Cohen's Ganada G2 speakers, Steve McCormack's VRE-1 preamp, and Esoteric amps. i think a Hansse tt, Durand Talea 2 arm, and Ortofon Windfield. this was the last room i visited with Snooky. and it was startling how much better it was than any of the other rooms other than the Blue Light Audio room. it's like my expections had lowered considerably, and then bam, here was the magic again. no; it did not quite reach the hights of the NVS-Telos-Anna. OTOH these speakers are 30x as expensive as the EA speakers. of course the tt-arm-cart is 1/5th the value of the NVS-Telos-Anna. it shows there are different paths to sonic bliss.

or maybe it's just that Joel Durand also set up this tuntable!

who knows?

anyway, while this system did not get quite as deep into the detail, or render the dynamic contrasts as clearly, or have quite the vivid immdeiacy in the muted horn, it did do all those things well and overall was very very good.

(3-tie) Soundsmith-#204. not sure the amps; the speakers were $3k retail. it was a VPI HRX tt, VPI 12" arm and Soundsmith Hyperion cactus needle cartridge. normally i don't care for Peter's rooms (OTOH i think Peter is super and a true asset to the vinyl community). he plays the music too loud and i have never warmed up to the Strain Gauge cartridges. but i'm sure the set-up in this case was super and the Hyperion is the real deal. there was a clear drop-off from #1 and #2 but this did capture the information for the most part.....although not the energy or note decay. but it was not just mush. i liked it.

(3-tie) Voce-Lindeman-Zesto #1011. vintage Luxman tt, Triplaner, Soundsmith Hyperion cactus needle cartridge. very similar to the Soundsmith room; maybe a little better as the speakers were higher level but not much. nice; it got the information. i liked the Zesto phono stage. the music had that ease and relaxed presentation.

(5) High Water Sound-Cessaro speakers-Thoress electronics. #243 in the Atrium. TW-Acustic tt and arm. Shilabe cartridge. i visited this room 3 times and stayed awhile. i always enjoy Jeff's room. he plays great music. overall it was a fine sounding room except there was just a slight bit of shoutyness from the horns. on Snooky it was good, but not great. most of the information, but not quite the full measure of the bloom and detail.

(6-tie) Silverline-Conrad Johnson-Kuzma #1018. Kuzma tt, Kuzma 4-point arm, Transfiguration Orpheus cartridge. this was pretty good and did get most of the information; but a clear level below the 2 Hyperion cartridges. good energy and flow.

(6-tie) Magico-Constellation-Brinkman-#203 in the Atrium. Brinkman tt, arm and cartridge. competent. nothing wrong. not quite the Orpheus in detail. overall i liked it.

(6-tie) Rockport-BAT electronics-Brinkman. #331 in the atrium. Brinkman tt, arm and cartridge. the room had issues but they were mostly in the bass; and so Snooky came thru fairly well. the combo of Rockport and BAT is not one i would have choosen, as both are a bit laid back in character, but i did enjoy it.

(9) Vandersteen-ARC-Basis #1004. Basis tt, Vector arm, Lyra Atlas. i liked the room and did visit it a couple other times and listen to other vinyl. it did sound good overall. i really do like the Vandersteen's and ARC gear. but on Snooky it was mush to a degree. and A.J. was out in the hall so you would assume the set-up was very good. yet; it did not have even the precision of the Soundsmith Hyperion cartridge....let alone anywhere close to the Durand-Ortofon's. if you never heard Snooky done right, i can see where you'd be enjoying it. but for me i was disappointed as i expected much more. i'm sure the Atlas is better than this.

(10) Von Schweikert-Sora Sound-George Warren. #529. George Warren tt-Morech arm, ZYX cartridge. this was ok, but could not reveal the detail.

(11) Scaena--VAC-ARC. #216. Kronos tt, Graham Phantom Supreme arm, Clearaudio Goldfinger Statement cartridge. i had high expectations for this system, the tonearm, and the cartridge. i had enjoyed the Scaena speakers before, the VAC electronics are always enjoyable to me, and i was anticipating hearing the Graham Supreme and the Goldfinger statement. i sat down right next to the Kronos turntable designer, who i assumed had set up the arm and cartridge. it was mostly a mess. everything. the bass was not right at all, the tt seemed to have speed issues, and Snooky was not happening. i'm going to assume that none of the parts were at fault, and wait until next time to assess the Phantom Supreme and Goldfinger Statement.

i had visited this room 3 different times and never heard it sound quite right.

ok; that is it. a caution; my comments pertain to the ability of these systems to play 'Snooky' at that particular time to my ears and nothing more.
 
Last edited:

puroagave

Member Sponsor
Sep 29, 2011
1,345
45
970
(1) Blue Light Audio room. #418. Evolution Acoustics-darTZeel, NVS-Telos-Ortofon Anna. as set up by Joel Durand, this system (even with $2500 EA speakers) portrayed Snooky in all it's glory. no it's not fully my home system completely. but it gets the energy and full spacial rendering of the cymbals, you get the distinctive metallic shimmer, the precise rendering of all the tiny detail and complete decay. at one point in the cut, the Cymbals change from a hi-hat to a splash type and this room/system captures it completely. the muted horn is alive and vibrant. overall there is an immediacy and life to the music. it's alive. the speakers completely disappear and every molecule in the room is music.

i liked this room too, Jon says they're shippping the MMMicroOnes in 6-weeks, got my order in. the NVS/Telos was very drool worthy, i envy the lucky owners.

(3-tie) Soundsmith-#204. not sure the amps; the speakers were $3k retail. it was a VPI HRX tt, VPI 12" arm and Soundsmith Hyperion cactus needle cartridge. normally i don't care for Peter's rooms (OTOH i think Peter is super and a true asset to the vinyl community). he plays the music too loud and i have never warmed up to the Strain Gauge cartridges. but i'm sure the set-up in this case was super and the Hyperion is the real deal. there was a clear drop-off from #1 and #2 but this did capture the information for the most part.....although not the energy or note decay. but it was not just mush. i liked it.

agreed. Matt weisfield was going back and forth between the new traveler 'table and the HRX and fooled an HRX owner who couldnt tell which was which. like the blue light room, small speakers that didnt interact too much with the room (a good thing)

(5) High Water Sound-Cessaro speakers-Thoress electronics. #243 in the Atrium. TW-Acustic tt and arm. Shilabe cartridge. i visited this room 3 times and stayed awhile. i always enjoy Jeff's room. he plays great music. overall it was a fine sounding room except there was just a slight bit of shoutyness from the horns. on Snooky it was good, but not great. most of the information, but not quite the full measure of the bloom and detail.

emotionally engaging system, my favorite. I didnt get the shoutyness at all on two separate visits. the woofer is almost full-range and the tweeter is a TAD source compression driver crossed over pretty high. if you said the Acapellas were shouty youd have no arguement from me ;)

(6-tie) Silverline-Conrad Johnson-Kuzma #1018. Kuzma tt, Kuzma 4-point arm, Transfiguration Orpheus cartridge. this was pretty good and did get most of the information; but a clear level below the 2 Hyperion cartridges. good energy and flow.

We sat on the long wall and heard the big Silverlines and it was just okay. the sound didnt really gel and seemed to stay at the speaker positions with little center fill. the little minuets played on the short wall were imprssive.

(6-tie) Magico-Constellation-Brinkman-#203 in the Atrium. Brinkman tt, arm and cartridge. competent. nothing wrong. not quite the Orpheus in detail. overall i liked it.

agreed

(9) Vandersteen-ARC-Basis #1004. Basis tt, Vector arm, Lyra Atlas. i liked the room and did visit it a couple other times and listen to other vinyl. it did sound good overall. i really do like the Vandersteen's and ARC gear. but on Snooky it was mush to a degree. and A.J. was out in the hall so you would assume the set-up was very good. yet; it did not have even the precision of the Soundsmith Hyperion cartridge....let alone anywhere close to the Durand-Ortofon's. if you never heard Snooky done right, i can see where you'd be enjoying it. but for me i was disappointed as i expected much more. i'm sure the Atlas is better than this.

one of my favorites, but imo the speakers were set way too far apart for that room, i suspect they wanted to max out the seating. ive heard them sound better at the dealer.


(11) Scaena--VAC-ARC. #216. Kronos tt, Graham Phantom Supreme arm, Clearaudio Goldfinger Statement cartridge. i had high expectations for this system, the tonearm, and the cartridge. i had enjoyed the Scaena speakers before, the VAC electronics are always enjoyable to me, and i was anticipating hearing the Graham Supreme and the Goldfinger statement. i sat down right next to the Kronos turntable designer, who i assumed had set up the arm and cartridge. it was mostly a mess. everything. the bass was not right at all, the tt seemed to have speed issues, and Snooky was not happening. i'm going to assume that none of the parts were at fault, and wait until next time to assess the Phantom Supreme and Goldfinger Statement.

agreed. interesting sepakers, not my cup o' camomile
 

puroagave

Member Sponsor
Sep 29, 2011
1,345
45
970
Did you order the $6K speaker cables?

http://www.stereophile.com/images/060412Dartzeel-600.jpg
Evolution Acoustics' MMMicro One loudspeakers—Reference 2-way ($2500/pair), complete with the company's own SRSC loudspeaker cables ($6000/pair).

hah. i didnt even ask about the cables. read somewhere they looked like they'd knock the speakers over. my cables are DIY, id rather spend the 6k on the playback designs MPD-3.
 

Gregadd

WBF Founding Member
Apr 20, 2010
10,571
1,791
1,850
Metro DC
OK I see what you mean. Too many want just euphonic colorations so everything sounds nice. Like the early SE amps.
not according to Sean Olive.i
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Co-Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing