US borrowing authority to be exhausted by Oct. 17

Steve Williams

Site Founder, Site Owner, Administrator
Nervous time again

By ANDREW TAYLOR | Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew said Wednesday the government will have exhausted its borrowing authority by Oct. 17, leaving the United States just $30 billion cash on hand to pay its bills.
That's a slightly worse financial position than Treasury predicted last month and adds to the pressure on Congress to increase the government's borrowing cap soon to avert a first-ever U.S. default on its obligations.

In a letter to top congressional leaders, Lew warned that a repeat of the debt brinksmanship of 2011 could inflict great harm on the economy and that "if the government should ultimately become unable to pay all of its bills, the results could be catastrophic."
The government reached its $16.7 trillion debt limit in May. Since then, it has been using "extraordinary measures" such as suspending U.S. investments in federal employee trust funds to create about $300 billion in additional borrowing room.

But on the 17th the government will be left with only its cash cushion and daily receipts to pay its bills. Lew warned that before long it would not be able to meet all of its obligations. Economists and financial market experts warn that the stock market could plummet and that investors would demand higher returns on Treasury notes, which could raise interest rates and harm the economy.

It's generally assumed that Treasury would make sure that the government wouldn't default on Treasury notes held by investors, including foreign countries like China, If it did default on such debt obligations it could be a catastrophe for the economy.
A House-passed stopgap spending measure pending before the Senate contains a GOP-backed provision that would give Social Security recipients and bondholders priority in receiving payments from the government.

Lew again rejected the idea.
"The United States should never have to choose, for example, whether to pay Social Security to seniors, pay benefits to our veterans, or make payments to state and local jurisdictions and health care providers under Medicare and Medicaid," Mr. Lew said. "There is no way of knowing the damage any prioritization plan would have on our economy and financial markets. It would represent an irresponsible retreat from a core American value: We are a nation that honors all of its commitments."
Lew again warned that President Barack Obama would not negotiate with Republicans over the debt limit.

"The president remains willing to negotiate over the future direction of fiscal policy, but he will not negotiate over whether the United States will pay its bills for past commitments," Lew wrote. Extending borrowing authority does not increase government spending; it simply allows the Treasury to pay for expenditures Congress has already approved."
Republicans want to add budget cuts and other legislation like a one-year delay of "Obamacare." House leaders hope to bring a debt limit increase to the floor by the end of this week but they haven't released any details yet.
 
More drama,they always kick the can down the road.
 
I want to know why I pay my tax money for some __iot to read Dr. Seuss and others, in Congress.
 
Funny thing is that Cruz completely missed the moral of the story: "you can’t knock things until you try it.” Shows you one can be good lawyer and still a total life screw up.
 
Last edited:
We have put some criminally irresponsible people in the US Congress.

Tim
 
How about when a congressman/woman passes away congress gifts their full salary with no taxes to their spouse. This just happened recently. The guy that kicked was a billionaire and they gave his wife $176,000 tax free like she needed it.
 
You are also paying for his gold plated health plan....for life. Funny.

You wouldn't want our wonderful pols to stoop to same health care plans that they vote for the rest of us, would you?
 
You wouldn't want our wonderful pols to stoop to same health care plans that they vote for the rest of us, would you?

It seems they are against universal healthcare for everyone besides them selves.

The thought that my tax dollars contributed to Darth Cheney's 5 open heart surgery procedures which cost over two million dollars makes me sick.

The rest of us would have been dead. Period. And yet he lives.
 
You wouldn't want our wonderful pols to stoop to same health care plans that they vote for the rest of us, would you?

God forbid.
 
It seems they are against universal healthcare for everyone besides them selves.

The thought that my tax dollars contributed to Darth Cheney's 5 open heart surgery procedures which cost over two million dollars makes me sick.

The rest of us would have been dead. Period. And yet he lives.

The awful truth is that they're be a lot more people alive if he was dead.
 
I continue to shake my head at the amount of extravagance thrown around while Joe Six-pack's dollar is buying him less and less. And heaven forbid he falls seriously ill.
 
I continue to shake my head at the amount of extravagance thrown around while Joe Six-pack's dollar is buying him less and less. And heaven forbid he falls seriously ill.

If you have no assets (other than empty beer cans) getting sick is less of an issue - they will not let you die and you go in flat broke and you come out flat broke.

Falling seriously ill is more of an issue for middle class suckers that have busted their ass to scrape together some savings, which will be depleted in a heartbeat once the healthcare vultures in this country have you in their cross-hair.
 
If you have no assets (other than empty beer cans) getting sick is less of an issue - they will not let you die and you go in flat broke and you come out flat broke.

Falling seriously ill is more of an issue for middle class suckers that have busted their ass to scrape together some savings, which will be depleted in a heartbeat once the healthcare vultures in this country have you in their cross-hair.

That reminds me...I need to bring back some empties! :p
 
I continue to shake my head at the amount of extravagance thrown around while Joe Six-pack's dollar is buying him less and less. And heaven forbid he falls seriously ill.

Joe Six-Pack and Nancy the Nurse and Melvin the middle manager and Ed the executive (though not at the C-level). You have to be very, very high up the foodchain for your dollar to be buying more, or even breaking even, in America today.

Tim
 
If you have no assets (other than empty beer cans) getting sick is less of an issue - they will not let you die and you go in flat broke and you come out flat broke.

Falling seriously ill is more of an issue for middle class suckers that have busted their ass to scrape together some savings, which will be depleted in a heartbeat once the healthcare vultures in this country have you in their cross-hair.

True, the system will not let you die in the ER because you have no insurance. But it will let you have sub-standard care until the problem is critical, driving mortality rates, and costs, through the roof. Opposing universal care in America is pointless if you can think past the ideology to what's actually happening in our healthcare system. We already have universal care in America; but our politics has forced us to have it in the most expensive and ineffective way possible.

Tim
 
True, the system will not let you die in the ER because you have no insurance. But it will let you have sub-standard care until the problem is critical, driving mortality rates, and costs, through the roof. Opposing universal care in America is pointless if you can think past the ideology to what's actually happening in our healthcare system. We already have universal care in America; but our politics has forced us to have it in the most expensive and ineffective way possible.

Tim

Agreed, we have public healthcare in the most irrational and inefficient of ways. Though IIRC Ron Paul said he'd let the poor guy who staggered into the ER die.
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Co-Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing