This is a slightly different thread from the very interesting one Lee started a few days ago, as I want to get opinion on what some of you consider to be an effective cable strategy for us Frugal Audiophiles. It is generally agreed that one should spend approximately 10-15% (maybe as high as 20%) of the audio budget on various cabling requirements. For the frugal audiophile this means that a lot of cables, if using the 10-15-20% rule, are not up for consideration. We could get lucky on the used market from time to time, but this means buying blind and not having the security of a money-back guarentee. But I digress as this is not my actual question.
Should the frugal audiophile consider spending more than the generally accepted 10-15-20 rule as a means to improve the quality of their playback? Or does this make for a futile or money-wasted consideration/strategy? Secondly, and this I pose only as its something I've often wondered about....do cables have more of an impact on lesser systems or does one need the have SOTA gear to get the most from them?
Should the frugal audiophile consider spending more than the generally accepted 10-15-20 rule as a means to improve the quality of their playback? Or does this make for a futile or money-wasted consideration/strategy? Secondly, and this I pose only as its something I've often wondered about....do cables have more of an impact on lesser systems or does one need the have SOTA gear to get the most from them?