I know some will claim outright that upgrading the Ethernet cables cannot make a positive contribution to better sound. My memory of the classes I took on the TCP/ IP protocol eons ago would agree with that - signal gets split up and then gets put together in whole. It was fun - the logic behind this fabulous protocol worked perfectly!
Yet many guys report positive sonic differences. I think even the computer audiophile, an analytical "transparency to source" listener, who supposedly trusts science and selects equipment marketed based on great science, used expensive audioquest Ethernet cables during his review of the Berkeley Reference dac.
Does any one understand the potential mechanisms behind people reporting positive results?
Could it be something with better shielding to kill off radiation?
Yet many guys report positive sonic differences. I think even the computer audiophile, an analytical "transparency to source" listener, who supposedly trusts science and selects equipment marketed based on great science, used expensive audioquest Ethernet cables during his review of the Berkeley Reference dac.
Does any one understand the potential mechanisms behind people reporting positive results?
Could it be something with better shielding to kill off radiation?