High Fidelity Cables- the new kid in town?

Priaptor

Member Sponsor
Jan 28, 2012
929
19
0
FL
I have indeed auditioned the CT-1 IC and they are excellent. In my system, at the time, they easily bested my MIT Matrix 50.

However, they are ONLY SE at this time. My understanding is that he is working on a balanced cable, although I didn't quite understand the technical issues, I did understand that using his "technology" will require two SE cables and hence double the price.

I can't speak to the legitimacy of the science, just the sound of his cable. Is is worth the price? It is up to each of us to determine that.
 

Speedskater

Well-Known Member
Sep 30, 2010
941
15
368
Cleveland Ohio
Not a lawyer. But information I find from lawyers is in the US you are not allowed to make or use even for personal use patented items without permission. You aren't likely to be prosecuted. But aren't actually being legal if you do such a thing. In any case without spending at least a thousand bucks plus no one would be convinced the result equaled the magic secret sauce of the patent holder it appears.
Under US patent law even your commercial competitors are permitted to make a copy of your unit for study. What is not permitted is selling that copy.
 

Atmasphere

Industry Expert
May 4, 2010
2,375
1,867
1,760
St. Paul, MN
www.atma-sphere.com
Not a lawyer. But information I find from lawyers is in the US you are not allowed to make or use even for personal use patented items without permission. You aren't likely to be prosecuted. But aren't actually being legal if you do such a thing. In any case without spending at least a thousand bucks plus no one would be convinced the result equaled the magic secret sauce of the patent holder it appears.

I have a couple of patents- the above is correct.

My understanding is that he is working on a balanced cable, although I didn't quite understand the technical issues, I did understand that using his "technology" will require two SE cables and hence double the price.

Just a FWIW: the balanced line cable system was devised to eliminate cable artifacts and it is actually very good at that if the standards are maintained.

The standards are:

1) pin outs- pin 1 is ground, male connectors are outputs, pin 2 is non-inverting in the US, pin 3 is inverting.
2) ground (pin 1) is ignored by the equipment; it is only used for shielding (no signal current)
3) the source driving the cable will be able to drive a low impedance - 1000 to 2000 ohms as a load should be no problem.

If you follow these practices the cable can be quite long without ill effects. You will also find that unusual configurations like the one suggested above will result in no improvement whatsoever.

However if the equipment does not support the standard in some way (most high end manufacturers get in trouble with #2 and #3) then all bets are off.
 

es347

VIP/Donor & WBF Founding Member
Apr 20, 2010
1,578
35
1,620
Midwest fly over state..

Speedskater

Well-Known Member
Sep 30, 2010
941
15
368
Cleveland Ohio
[........................................]

Just a FWIW: the balanced line cable system was devised to eliminate cable artifacts and it is actually very good at that if the standards are maintained.

The standards are:

1) pin outs- pin 1 is ground, male connectors are outputs, pin 2 is non-inverting in the US, pin 3 is inverting.
2) ground (pin 1) is ignored by the equipment; it is only used for shielding (no signal current)
3) the source driving the cable will be able to drive a low impedance - 1000 to 2000 ohms as a load should be no problem.

If you follow these practices the cable can be quite long without ill effects. You will also find that unusual configurations like the one suggested above will result in no improvement whatsoever.

However if the equipment does not support the standard in some way (most high end manufacturers get in trouble with #2 and #3) then all bets are off.

For balanced interconnects using XLR connectors, Audio Engineering Society Standard #48 is the reference.
But pin #1 is not the audio circuit ground it is the shield and in equipment, it should only be connected to the chassis.
A balanced interconnect has no audio circuit ground.
 

rbbert

Well-Known Member
Dec 12, 2010
3,820
239
1,000
Reno, NV
Which is what Ralph posted ( and you quoted)?
 

Atmasphere

Industry Expert
May 4, 2010
2,375
1,867
1,760
St. Paul, MN
www.atma-sphere.com
For balanced interconnects using XLR connectors, Audio Engineering Society Standard #48 is the reference.
But pin #1 is not the audio circuit ground it is the shield and in equipment, it should only be connected to the chassis.
A balanced interconnect has no audio circuit ground.

Correct. See 2) of the original post.
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Co-Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing