I would imagine a car to achieve greater terminal velocity than a bike...
Perhaps, I should have advanced Newton's Law in terms of acceleration
Yeah, I think my bike "only" goes 192! There are plenty of vette's and such that do over 200
I would imagine a car to achieve greater terminal velocity than a bike...
Perhaps, I should have advanced Newton's Law in terms of acceleration
Yeah, I think my bike "only" goes 192! There are plenty of vette's and such that do over 200
Bruce,
What's the greatest speed you've taken your bike? I'm thinking it would be easier to integrate effects with a car to keep it on the ground.
This bike I've gotten up to around 165 on I-90.... that was plenty fast enough for me!
The entire post:
Probably not...
bhp/weight, F =ma
I would imagine a car to achieve greater terminal velocity than a bike...
Perhaps, I should have advanced Newton's Law in terms of acceleration
Most sports cars are faster at deceleration (braking) than motorcycles. Cars just have more tire contact surface area.So are there cars as fast as bikes?
The new Porsche 911 turbo is less than three seconds, 2.7? I was at a dealership this weekend for a parts swap meet and that's what the salesman claimed. Only $120,000.There are several crotch rockets that can do 0-60 in less than 3 seconds. You won't find many cars that are capable of that however the Bugatti Veyron will get you from 9-62 in 2.5 secs...at a mere $2.6MM. But can you imagine the pair of loudspeakers you could get for that kind of bread??
Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | Ron Resnick Site Co-Owner | Administrator | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |