I said this:
I am being very clear that measurements at the terminal are not representative of how the unit is used.
Characterising a device by measurement involves isolating the unit in the first place & measuring it's output alone, without any conflating variables - a basic step you continually skip.
Next step, attach cords & do far end measurements, knowing that you are now measuring device + cord/cable. IMO you have shown a continual desire to conflate these issues for whatever reasons best known to yourself.
Did you ever investigate & get to the bottom of the cause for the mains harmonics you saw in your measurements of the microrendu?
The measurements must include a cable unlike what you are representing.
You are misrepresenting what I'm saying or more worryingly, you don't understand it - it's a basic approach to measurements that everyone knows - characterise the DUT first.
As I said your approach & continually presented logic is to NOT try to characterise the device but instead conflate other variables in the measurements & claim that "this is how the device is used" or "this is what we listen to".
Why don't you just take your measurements at the speakers output because up to this point we don't hear anything - this is your argument distilled to the absurd? Your MO is - when it suits you (i.e it's a negative measurement) you show the DUT measurements - when a DUT measurement shows a positive change you state that this is immaterial as it's not what we hear & insist that only measuring the analogue side is of importance.
Using your speaker analogy, it is like expecting people hooking them up to an amplifier without wire. That can't happen, nor can this. So measurements need to include the interconnect and if that interconnect creates problems that this device is supposed to solve, it is a big deal.
I didn't see anywhere that it was claimed that the LPS-1 could be used with any cable (DIY or otherwise) & it would be deliver perfect power - did you?
Your arguments are all over the place, as usual. "So measurements need to include the interconnect" - which Kingpin didn't do - I believe he used an interconnect of his own making. But he was at least inquisitive enough to chase down the anomaly he saw in his measurements & report it here. Something I have never seen you do except when your obvious measurement gaffs are pointed out to you!
"if that interconnect creates problems that this device is supposed to solve" where is it stated that the LPS1 will solve problems that are created by a home made cord?
You need to stop plucking claims out of the air for products, building strawmen & then showing some dubious measurements to tear down your self-built strawman.