What's interesting to me here isn't so much the "analogue vs digital" aspect, it's the idea of artistic control from start to finish. Tarantino has made an artistic decision to use 70mm film to shoot the movie because of the way it looks, but he would also prefer the playback/projection to be done on 70mm with well-defined standards and rules to complete the effect. This, sadly, is where the audiophile case differs. The artist or engineer might make an artistic decision about the recording, but their control over playback is minimal. It may be the case that some artists record with a particular playback system in mind, but I imagine they're few and far between and confined to audiophile circles. If anything, the usual assumption seems to be for mp3, and we have loudness wars and other stuff to contend with instead. All told, the push for absolute quality is not one we often get to enjoy from most artists. I wish it were so. Instead, audiophiles must choose their poison as they see fit, and then spend all day trying to justify to all and sundry why they're right.
As always, "best" is in the eye of the beholder. Film is great when used artistically to create an effect (and don't get me wrong, I LOVE the effect), but it might not be the premier choice for a documentary, for example. I don't understand why anyone needs validation that their preference implies an absolute, but that's another story. It's tiresome in the extreme, but here we are.
What's interesting to me here isn't so much the "analogue vs digital" aspect, it's the idea of artistic control from start to finish. Tarantino has made an artistic decision to use 70mm film to shoot the movie because of the way it looks, but he would also prefer the playback/projection to be done on 70mm with well-defined standards and rules to complete the effect. This, sadly, is where the audiophile case differs. The artist or engineer might make an artistic decision about the recording, but their control over playback is minimal. It may be the case that some artists record with a particular playback system in mind, but I imagine they're few and far between and confined to audiophile circles. If anything, the usual assumption seems to be for mp3, and we have loudness wars and other stuff to contend with instead. All told, the push for absolute quality is not one we often get to enjoy from most artists. I wish it were so. Instead, audiophiles must choose their poison as they see fit, and then spend all day trying to justify to all and sundry why they're right.
As always, "best" is in the eye of the beholder. Film is great when used artistically to create an effect (and don't get me wrong, I LOVE the effect), but it might not be the premier choice for a documentary, for example. I don't understand why anyone needs validation that their preference implies an absolute, but that's another story. It's tiresome in the extreme, but here we are.
THe merits of this situation has nothing to do with technology or even the look of the movie. Production in digital is cheaper than film so that is the way studios want to shoot them. Now enter a hot-shot director. If you are successful enough, you get to demand terms. And one of those terms is shooting on film. Not because the director needs that technically. He needs it from ego/pride point of view to match the previous director who forces his studio to shoot on film. In other words, it is a demonstration that you have arrived as a director in Hollywood: "oh he got the studio to shoot it on film!"
The films are then digitized and to save money, edited in 2K. Now comes 4K video and HDR. You have to go back to the negatives and rescan them at great expense!!! Which ain't going to happen and slows to a trickle the availability of such movies in 4K/HDR.
Coming from a relative ignoramus ( Used to be a Photographer , even practiced the Zone System back in the days, but am back albeit timidly) I am learning Photoshop and dabbled with GIMP. It seems to me you can mimic the film look with digital hardware and the appropriate software add-ons. Here I am sounding like Blizzard but software can mimic most of what one sees in analog aka film. I have seen someone mimic the grain of a photo taken with a 50 MP to look like it was taken with a Kodak Tri-X.
Artists are special people: A writer friend doesn't use Word Processor to write her novels, another use pen and paper ... Maybe it is the case with film too, I tend to think it is. They like film. I have been trained to see what a good picture can be , the zone system saw to that... I am not seeing Digital picture lacking anything if aything they are sometimes too revealing .. things that can dialed back in software.
In the end it is an artistic decision. One of our companies which specialize in TV Commercials shoots with both film (ARRI) and digital (RED). One of our other subsidiaries in partnership with another company does Telecine (film to digital conversion) and heavy post. The client decides what look he wants and the choices of what to use follow. In recent years HD and now 4K is trending mostly for beauty products and food shots which are typically very lit and are shot up close. Ads that tell stories go for film treatment if the client can afford it so this limits the clients to large multinationals like Proctor & Gamble, Unilever, Colgate Palmolive, and the like. The decision of what to use isn't ours, we just shoot, edit, post and dub then hand it over to the clients and their respective ad agencies.
I should add that in my experience one of the key reasons I think agencies and clients have been so keen to embrace shooting TVCs digitally is that they get to watch back every take of every setup as soon as the director's yelled "Cut!"
"Can we watch that back?" has become the agency/client mantra heard behind monitors throughout studios the world over. With film, they never had that luxury, and needed to trust the director's instincts a lot more, rather than undermining them by constant second-guessing.
Just saying'.
Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | Ron Resnick Site Co-Owner | Administrator | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |