Unfortunately CDs and LPs don't. None that accompany the music in time anyway.
Playboy had Editorials?
When visuals matter
- Thread starter amirm
- Start date
Unfortunately CDs and LPs don't. None that accompany the music in time anyway.
Playboy had Editorials?
...
Playboy had Editorials?
And other stuff too; photographed (visual) articles. ...On several levels, not just hi-end audio and jewelry and nice cars and watches.
I was talking about Bluray music discs and, in particular, classical music discs, and not about movies. I do not watch movies more than once because I just rent them (and that should tell you something about my level of interest in them and the music on them). OTOH, I find that my interest in the video component of non-classical music discs is much greater. I suspect that this is because I find that the music is less than riveting but the personalities of the performers hold my attention.
Really??? No explanation should be needed.....
"Even though I love modern instrumental music, I found the CD quite boring and could not listen to it more than once. The synthesized background loop got to me immediately."
The only thing her producer is good at is producing crap sound in a trendy & slick video that people like. Gawd Awful
Last edited:
I knew all of that already Kal; I was simply saying. ...Like there are also other members here. :b
- We all (each one) have our own particular preferences regarding music, movies, audio, and video.
That's interesting.
Roger is referring to Amir's video from the original first post; the artist, the young girl, the violinist, the music, her music, the way it was recorded, the mix, the CD, and all that looping electronica/synthesizer jazz. ...I don't know her name exactly; she escaped my horizon .... :b
* She simply is not the type of music player who strikes any chord in my soul. ...Not at all.
Classical music is my bag, just like it is also for you Kal. ...Opera, Chorales, Orchestral, Chamber, etc.
I also very much enjoy Jazz (many various styles of Jazz, in particular from the ECM record music label), and Blues (there too, many type of Blues, in particular Acoustic more).
And of course I love some New Age music, and World (International) music of many genres; African, Argentina, Flamenco, Tango, and so much more.
But this thread is about the "visuals" emphasis superimposed over the music.
And we get that from Blu-ray discs, DVD discs, Youtube, and even music concerts broadcast(ed) on the regular tube (Pay TV from cable or satellite).
Me, I'm a Blu-ray man; strictly (99%), today. ...Visuals matter, a lot! ...It simply adds another layer, dimensional newer perspective and understanding deeper. ...With any type of music; and it don't have to be necessarily by seeing the musicians. ...Mountains with snow tops can do just fine in my book.
Last edited:
The video held my attention for about 10 seconds and then seemed to loop over over again with no creativity at all. The music held my attention for not much longer for the same kind of reason. Too repetitious.
Two of the best examples (maybe 3) of artists that have this discipline down are Peter Gabriel, Annie Lennox and Kate Bush. I can watch their videos or listen to the songs on their own with equal enjoyment. Marrying the two disciplines is an art unto itself and should not be attempted if you don't have the goods.
Two of the best examples (maybe 3) of artists that have this discipline down are Peter Gabriel, Annie Lennox and Kate Bush. I can watch their videos or listen to the songs on their own with equal enjoyment. Marrying the two disciplines is an art unto itself and should not be attempted if you don't have the goods.
Check his quote above yours Kal. That is his reply to your "????" ...It is very obvious to me that Roger is/was referring to her video and also her CD; the music content, and even her producer.
==> Again, from Amir's first original post (the video he provided, with the name of the young female musician 'violinist', and even the CD which I believe contains that particular tune).
Kal, did you read the first post? If you did then you'd know what Roger was talking about.
* (Those are my own, for clarity purpose), right next after (preceding) few underlines (my own too).
Last edited:
Sorry I didn't mean to cause confusion. Bob is right,the only subject I commented on was the Amir's original post. I didn't even read the other posts.
Since my post was the immediate antecedent of his and he made no specific reference, it is logical to assume it referred to mine. That's why I asked.
I did read it but there's no way that one can assume his reply referred to a post 23 posts above.Kal, did you read the first post? If you did then you'd know what Roger was talking about.
OK. All I was asking for was that clarity.
Last edited:
Similar threads
- Sticky
 | Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator |  | Ron Resnick Site Co-Owner | Administrator |  | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |