Spirit, I have heard good and not so good things from people about these tables. Some say they sound analytical or kind of digital so if I had my choice I would like a table that sounds more warm with body then a table that is on the cool side.
Of course you have. People have different preferences, including Fremer. This isn't even to mention
biases. I sat next to Fremer briefly in the Einstein LAAS suite last summer. He raved about the sound from this system. It featured a Tech Das AF3 as the source, I recall. A mid 6 figure rig without breaking a sweat. Me, I found the sound in this suite to be unnatural sounding and simply unengaging. I can think of at least a few [much less expensive] suites from LAAS that tugged at my heartstrings in a way the Einstein suite could not. Different strokes. Now with regards to Stabi M, anyone who says it is analytical or digital sounding must prefer a much warmer, thicker sound than I do. Music flows naturally from my Stabi M with 11" 4 point. I've used a Kiseki Purpleheart and a Transfiguration Proteus so far, and both (while different), just sound smooth, effortless, and unforced. Even handed and linear across the spectrum. If you want extra bloom, you'll pick a cart that provides it, dial it in to taste with tubes, etc. The Stabi M itself is neutral with the 4-point (IMO) being a bit warm yet big and dimensional sounding with incredible detail retrieval capability (unlike, say, a Triplanar arm).
As Paul said, the end result is all about balance (which is what I mean by synergy). There is no "best", with apologies to forum founders. ;-)