Daedalus and Sonus Faber are two for starters.what other real speaker manufacturer uses solid wood? With joinery structure no less? I cannot think of even one.
Daedalus and Sonus Faber are two for starters.what other real speaker manufacturer uses solid wood? With joinery structure no less? I cannot think of even one.
Very nice work, Bill.
Yours,
Jonathan
Beautiful.Hi Jonathan,
As an FYI, I am very well experienced in wood working and indeed build my own speakers in solid hardwoods. I am well versed in joinery and understand the subject well. I would be very happy to discuss your choice of joinery and methods for cabinet design in addition to crossover design.
To prove I am not telling lies, please see latest horn / wg in mahogany on top of maple active slob chassis with inlay wings. Finished in oil /
View attachment 98316
In our 25,000 square foot woodshop. With state of the art $200000 German cnc machines...
This is real craftsmanship. It’s also how the finest furniture and musical instruments have been made for centuries.
Nice system. Glad Santa's elves were able to get their orders out early. Enjoy.Santa came 2 days early. I've been into high-end audio since the 70's. I have done a lot of trading up over the years along with some new purchases such as these wonderful speakers. My current system is comprised of a VAC Sigma 170i integrated amp with phono, a Bricasti M3 DAC/Streamer and a VPI Prime TT with an Ortofon Cadena Blue cartridge. The system feels well balanced, and the Fleetwoods have unlocked additional detail and dynamics. Well worth it. As far as what I would like to see next from Fleetwood... I suppose a floor standing version, even thought there is plenty of bass already.
View attachment 101971
Hi Jonathan,OMA never made a preamp and a power amp, all of our amps have been integrated. Fleetwood will be the same. We've been working on this for more than three years, should be done by beginning of next year in terms of delivery. We are working on several topologies, mainly involving hybrid designs with both tubes and solid state, but totally different from how other makers are doing this. Different topology.
Yours,
Jonathan
Because speaker cabinets need to be inert, absorptive but solid wood is resonant. It rings like a bell at a certain frequency depending on the type of the wood. If you want to make a musical instrument to shine on certain frequencies with a resonant character then wood is ok. You shouldn’t want to add additional coloration over instrument’s original sound while reproducing it with a speaker. Optimally it is expected from the cabinet to be dead quiet while drivers are producing sound. Even mdf and plywood are more absorptive compared to solid wood because of glue.This is clearly someone totally ignorant about high end woodworking, for example. It's important to note- what other real speaker manufacturer uses solid wood? With joinery structure no less? I cannot think of even one. What does that tell you? If it's so easy and cheap to make things like this, why is no one else doing it?
From personal experience, speaker cabinets do not have to be inert to produce great sound. There are/were several manufacturers that use the cabinet as a part of the sound. the Solovox being the one I have heard the most. This is definitely where the "different strokes" saying comes into play. The Wilson/Magico/Vandersteen side have their approach and OMA and a few others have theirs. Neither is "wrong" and what people need to do is decide for themselves what sound they like. Neither is likely to poach the others customers as the presentations are very different.Because speaker cabinets need to be inert, absorptive but solid wood is resonant. It rings like a bell at a certain frequency depending on the type of the wood. If you want to make a musical instrument to shine on certain frequencies with a resonant character then wood is ok. You shouldn’t want to add additional coloration over instrument’s original sound while reproducing it with a speaker. Optimally it is expected from the cabinet to be dead quiet while drivers are producing sound. Even mdf and plywood are more absorptive compared to solid wood because of glue.
And Harbeth, which I also own, being another famous example.There are/were several manufacturers that use the cabinet as a part of the sound. the Solovox being the one I have heard the most....
And Diapason (https://www.diapason-italia.com/en/adamantesV.html). Those Italians certainly know how to make beautiful things. I used to have one of an earlier iteration of Adamantes, but the sound was a bit too polite if I remember correctly.Daedalus and Sonus Faber are two for starters.
I asked Jonathan about this and he said that the 1000 is better, but not 3x the price better. He mentioned better power supplies in the 1000 as a potential reason for the improvement.In general, the reviews do often mention that there is a step up regarding the Technics 700 vs 1000...
Since the Devilles are easily driven, did anyone find the jump to 1000 worthwhile?
My gut feeling is likely not much, hoping Jonathan can chime in. I know he recently trialed the 1000 after giving the 700 much praise, am bit curious.
You can buy one box and then buy two individually. I did at my local dealer.Hello fellow Deville owners. I'm looking for someone who would like to go halfsies on three sets of IsoAcoustic Gaia speaker stand isolators. You can read up on them at the IsoAcoustic's web site, and there are several positive reviews out there as well. I personally used them on my Nola KOs and they did indeed tighten up the bass. The Deville stands have threaded receptacles to accept them. Gaias are sold four in a box. Since the Deville's stands have only three feet you would need to buy two boxes and not use two of the isolators, but if two of us buy three boxes, we could then split them up as six for each of us. The Gaias for the Deville's weight are $200 per set of four, so that's $300 each. Here's a picture of them on the Devilles.
I've heard both with the Devilles and yes the 1000 is better, but it's not a simple comparison so other factors may influence which one you get besides price. If you have a serious vinyl addiction (as I do), you may opt for the 1000 as the RIAA conversion is significantly better to my ears.In general, the reviews do often mention that there is a step up regarding the Technics 700 vs 1000...
Since the Devilles are easily driven, did anyone find the jump to 1000 worthwhile?
My gut feeling is likely not much, hoping Jonathan can chime in. I know he recently trialed the 1000 after giving the 700 much praise, am bit curious.
I ended up with the Technics recommended amp, MU1 streamer straight into the Technics digital amp, will see how that goes. I am curious if putting a DAC into that mentioned chain making any difference if at all, since the design of the Technics amp being all digital.I've heard both with the Devilles and yes the 1000 is better, but it's not a simple comparison so other factors may influence which one you get besides price. If you have a serious vinyl addiction (as I do), you may opt for the 1000 as the RIAA conversion is significantly better to my ears.
Beau
Hi there, when you heard both of the Technics amps with the Deville, did you just use the onboard DAC on the Technics amp or did you use your own DAC? I called a retailer to confirm the Technics amp having its own DAC and it does.I've heard both with the Devilles and yes the 1000 is better, but it's not a simple comparison so other factors may influence which one you get besides price. If you have a serious vinyl addiction (as I do), you may opt for the 1000 as the RIAA conversion is significantly better to my ears.
Beau
![]() | Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Ron Resnick Site Co-Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |