No black hole at center of Milky Way?

BlueFox

Member Sponsor
Nov 8, 2013
1,635
318
240

morricab

Well-Known Member
Apr 25, 2014
6,110
2,385
453
Switzerland
"What if the center of our galaxy isn’t a supermassive black hole after all, but instead, a massive amount of dark matter? That would flip our long-held understanding of the Milky Way, but in a new study, scientists from Italy, Argentina, and Colombia say the evidence stacks up."

Would be interesting to know what they mean by “better statistical fit” and how much difference we are talking about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Al M.

Al M.

VIP/Donor
Sep 10, 2013
6,891
2,495
553
Greater Boston
Would be interesting to know what they mean by “better statistical fit” and how much difference we are talking about.

Yeah, I remember when some scientists got excited about some alleged anomalies in outer edges of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) map, which they thought pointed to another universe (or a multiverse). Turns out the "multiverse" finger prints were a statistical error (or statistically irrelevant, don't remember). Oops.
 

astrotoy

VIP/Donor
May 25, 2010
1,303
634
495
SF Bay Area
In astronomy, where observations are always very difficult (the easy stuff has been done a long time ago), anomalies in observations from what is predicted or expected usually mean something is wrong in the observation. However, every so often, the anomaly means there is something wrong with what we think we know. And once in a blue moon (couldn't resist that) it shakes our understanding in a truly fundamental way.

I was an astronomy major in college in the '60s and then in grad school following that. I studied stars, in particular, the outer layers of stars during the later stages of their lives, when more massive ones expand to become red supergiant stars. This was working out details in what had been theorized about the evolution of stars. Nothing profoundly new, but adding to the canon of knowledge. Most astronomers do that. Make observations or theories that confirm or extend the detail of what we think we know or what we know.

At the time I was studying in college and grad school, the biggest discovery was the cosmic background radiation (sometimes called the 3 degree black body radiation) something that had been predicted in the late 1940's as radiation left over from the Big Bang. It was a big deal because it was the confirmation that there was a Big Bang. It was confirmation of a theory, as Eddington's observation of the positions of stars near the sun during an eclipse was the confirmation of Einstein's General Theory of Relativity.

However, as I have written before, anomalies in observation, when they end up to be true, can have fundamental affects on our understanding of the universe. Two anomalies discovered in the last third of the the 20th century, Vera Rubin's measurement of velocity of material in the outer arms of galaxies, and Sol Perlmutter and colleagues observation of the acceleration of galaxies as they recede from each other, have led us to understand that everything that we have been studying - stars, planets, galaxies, interstellar gas and dust, even black holes the entire universe that we knew existed when I completed my PHD, only makes up about 5% of the universe. another 20% is dark matter (mentioned in the first post) and 75% is dark energy. Dark matter that is dark (not visible) which we only know is matter from its gravitational effect on stuff we can see. Dark energy is dark (not visible) and we only know because of its effect on stuff we can see.

So when I started teaching my introductory college astronomy classes, I was pretty confident (actually quite confident) that I was giving them a pretty complete, and pretty well understood view of the universe. Now, if I were still teaching, I would have to say that this course is mostly about 5% of the universe, and a little speculation about what the other 95% is about. I may still be around when we start to learn about that other 95%.

Larry
 
Last edited:

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Co-Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing