In good amplifier with really good iron GE can be much better than any Amperex in lesser amps...
What I'm trying to get an answer to is whether amp designers really do voice their products around a particular tube.
I believe both Kondo and my amp, Nat, are designed on the basis of the GE 211.
Does this objectively mean another 211, RCA, UE, Amperex, Telefunken RS 237, AN, Mayer Elrog, which may in and of itself be a superior tube to the GE, very possibly *don't* hit the heights more than the GE in the same amp?
Did Thomas Mayer comment on another tubes thread that there are a lot of variables to which brand of tube (in this case 211, but could also apply to 845, 300B etc) sounds best, there's no simplistic Telefunken RS 237 > Amperex > UE > RCA > GE that can be applied to every 211 amp out there, even with perfect matching and correct biasing.
And since one can't get one's money back based on "oh, these Mayer Elrogs *really* don't sound better than my GEs", isn't this one case in audio where "the devil you know", in my case GEs, really does preclude potentially flushing £5-10k away on a failed Amperex etc punt?