Maybe I'm just crazy

taters

New Member
Jun 6, 2012
301
0
0
I read the most recent thread on Analog vs Digital. I'm not here to debate that. I do prefer the mechanical aspects of Analog vs Digital. I like cleaning the record and putting it on the turntable. I even enjoy watching it spin. I guess I'm just old school.
 

docvale

Well-Known Member
Mar 21, 2011
542
53
940
Briarcliff Manor, NY
I read the most recent thread on Analog vs Digital. I'm not here to debate that. I do prefer the mechanical aspects of Analog vs Digital. I like cleaning the record and putting it on the turntable. I even enjoy watching it spin. I guess I'm just old school.

Not crazy at all :) The ritual is part of the pleasure!
 

JackD201

WBF Founding Member
Apr 20, 2010
12,319
1,429
1,820
Manila, Philippines
It's putting the LPs back in their sleeves, those into the jackets, and those into their outer covers that I hate.
 

jazdoc

Member Sponsor
Aug 7, 2010
3,328
737
1,700
Bellevue
Taters, I do agree with you that there is a thrill that comes with being able to set up and get that last iota of performance from a vinyl rig. (Akin to the satisfaction of being able to work on your own car.) Unfortunately, I think that many (?most?) vinyl owners have no idea what they are leaving on the table because they can't or won't go through the hassle of learning to set it up.

I'm a radiologist and we migrated from analog images nearly 10 years ago and I wouldn't go back. A perfect analog chest X-ray on a young, healthy patient is a thing of beauty...problem is that it represents a pretty small sample of actual patients that you see. Likewise a great analog recording is probably the apex of recorded sound but unfortunately, that's only a small percentage of recorded music. With digital radiography, you can change parameters and turn a suboptimal study into a readable exam. The lack of user interactivity frustrates and exasperates me about digital music.

Hey, I'm a record collector first and audiophile second. The thrill of chasing down and acquiring that hard to find pressing of [fill in the blank] is like crack for me. But like illicit drugs, vinyl is an expensive hobby where you have to watch for unscrupulous sellers. Even new vinyl releases are significantly more expensive than their digital counterparts. Neither do I care for cleaning, storing and caring for records. I do it because the only thing analog has going for it versus digital is better sound (most of the time). But given the convenience and portability of digital music, if and when digital sound quality equals analog, I'm more than ready to switch.

Back to spinning the Vegh String Quartet playing a little Bartok on an original mono Columbia slab o' vinyl...
 

MylesBAstor

Well-Known Member
Apr 20, 2010
11,238
81
1,725
New York City
Taters, I do agree with you that there is a thrill that comes with being able to set up and get that last iota of performance from a vinyl rig. (Akin to the satisfaction of being able to work on your own car.) Unfortunately, I think that many (?most?) vinyl owners have no idea what they are leaving on the table because they can't or won't go through the hassle of learning to set it up.

I'm a radiologist and we migrated from analog images nearly 10 years ago and I wouldn't go back. A perfect analog chest X-ray on a young, healthy patient is a thing of beauty...problem is that it represents a pretty small sample of actual patients that you see. Likewise a great analog recording is probably the apex of recorded sound but unfortunately, that's only a small percentage of recorded music. With digital radiography, you can change parameters and turn a suboptimal study into a readable exam. The lack of user interactivity frustrates and exasperates me about digital music.

Hey, I'm a record collector first and audiophile second. The thrill of chasing down and acquiring that hard to find pressing of [fill in the blank] is like crack for me. But like illicit drugs, vinyl is an expensive hobby where you have to watch for unscrupulous sellers. Even new vinyl releases are significantly more expensive than their digital counterparts. Neither do I care for cleaning, storing and caring for records. I do it because the only thing analog has going for it versus digital is better sound (most of the time). But given the convenience and portability of digital music, if and when digital sound quality equals analog, I'm more than ready to switch.

Back to spinning the Vegh String Quartet playing a little Bartok on an original mono Columbia slab o' vinyl...

Or as they say, digital for satellites and analog for music :)
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Co-Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing