‘Gravity’ Review: This’ll Scare Off Any Would-Be Astronauts

Steve Williams

Site Founder, Site Owner, Administrator

Steve Williams

Site Founder, Site Owner, Administrator
Friday Box Office: 'Gravity' Earns $17.5m, Rockets Towards $50m

Scott Mendelson, Forbes

Well, the good news for George Clooney is that Batman & Robin is probably no longer his biggest opening weekend. And Sandra Bullock probably has a new record opening weekend too, which would be her fifth such “record” in her last seven films (a stunning statistic I’ll go into tomorrow). But poor director Alfonso Cuaron, he’ll have to settle for Gravity being his second-biggest debut behind the $93m opening of Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban. Yes, Gravity is indeed skyrocketing way past even reasonable expectations, with $17.525 million on Friday alone. Considering how not front-loaded it was on Thursday (just $1.4 million), it stands to reason that this one is going to play like an old-school hit film. If it makes it to 2.86x for the weekend, it’ll top $50 million.


Of course that’s not a guarantee, even with stellar word-of-mouth and a 91-minute running time. But even if it ends up with just 2.75x for the weekend, it still gets to a superb $48 million. If it actually makes it to 3x, we’re looking at a $52.5m debut weekend, but let’s not get ahead of ourselves. It may not surpass Paranormal Activity 3‘s October record $52.56m debut or even the $50.2m haul of Jackass 3, but it could. It will surely end up as the best non-sequel debut in this month of horror (The Grudge, with $39m back in 2004). Speaking of which, it will be interesting to see what, if any, advantage the film picks up this month by virtue of being the closest thing to a horror film we’ll get outside of the October 18th remake of Carrie. While not traditional horror, Gravity is likely to be the scariest film of the month.

Obviously it’s way too soon to talk long-term results, but for the moment let’s just celebrate a superb opening day for what is my favorite film of the year. Moreover, it’s a rare event: A big movie that is both terrific and absolutely demands to be seen on the biggest IMAX 3D screen you can find. Gravity earned $3.6m of its Friday haul (20%) in IMAX screens, giving a solid boost to the company and to those who actually want 3D to succeed. It’s also a clear example of the pull of real star power, as Bullock and Clooney did their job plugging the movie to general moviegoers who otherwise might not have flocked to a 3D space thriller. Anyway, the rest can wait until we see how high Gravity flies. But for now, if you haven’t seen it, go see it.

The other wide release was 20th Century Fox's Runner Runner. The $30 million overseas online poker thriller stars Justin Timberlake and Ben Affleck, and was given a relatively light push. As somewhat expected, the poorly reviewed pot-boiler earned just under $3m on Friday for an over/under $8 million weekend. But it’s already opened overseas and pulled in around $15m thus far. So long-story short, it’s a miss in America, but it will make its money back thanks to foreign grosses. As I wrote yesterday, this is both the kind of old-school pulp star-driven thriller that was in short supply for awhile but also is the kind of movie that won’t lose a thing on DVD in five months. Pulling Strings, a bilingual romantic comedy from Lionsgate and Pantelion Films opened on 387 screens and pulled in $758,000 for its trouble. It’s no No Instructions Included box office-wise, but it’s good that these releases may start becoming a regular thing.

That’s enough for now. I’ll cover the holdovers tomorrow when the weekend estimates roll in. For now, go see Gravity!
 

KeithR

VIP/Donor
May 7, 2010
5,174
2,864
1,898
Encino, CA
One of the best films Ive ever seen, Steve. Riveting. Cant wait to see again- saw it in AMC ETS 3D, so a decent theater - but will head to real Imax next time
 

Peter Breuninger

[Industry Expert] Member Sponsor
Jul 20, 2010
1,231
4
0
We have a great Imax in King of Prussia and will see it after RMAF.
 

Steve Williams

Site Founder, Site Owner, Administrator
Saw the film this afternoon in Imax 3D and all I can say is that this film is nothing short of magnificent. This film has to be seen in Imax 3D to experience the full splendor of the film, photography and CGI.If you want an adrenaline rush, this is it The film is all of 91 minutes long and I can candidly say that for me it seemed double that. I was glued to my seat, my heart was pounding, my palms were moist and I was sweating. This is about as real an adventure 600 miles above the earth Camera work and cinematography are huge in this film and I fully expect a Best Picture, Best Director and Best Actress nominations

KeithR says it is one of the best films he has ever seen. I wouldn't go that far but I would agree that the genius behind creating this film will result in many Oscars. When one stops to think that most of this film was done with Clooney and Bullock doing "green screen" and then to see the end result is a treat for one's eyes

This film is about as good as it gets and run, don't walk to see it.
 

KeithR

VIP/Donor
May 7, 2010
5,174
2,864
1,898
Encino, CA
Steve- I thought it was better than 3 of the past 4 Oscar winners, and hence my claim.

I think Cuaron made Ben Affleck look like an amateur. And the way space was presented in an entirely new fashion will be talked about in twenty years.
 

jazdoc

Member Sponsor
Aug 7, 2010
3,328
737
1,700
Bellevue
Keith,

I also think Cuaron is a genius director. The battle scene in "Children of Men" was incredible...
 

DaveyF

Well-Known Member
Jul 31, 2010
6,129
181
458
La Jolla, Calif USA
I saw this movie today in IMAX 3d....all I can say is......WOW!!!!
The special effects are superb and I think the movie is one for the ages...I LOVED IT!!
 

Steve Williams

Site Founder, Site Owner, Administrator
I saw this movie today in IMAX 3d....all I can say is......WOW!!!!
The special effects are superb and I think the movie is one for the ages...I LOVED IT!!

Imax 3D IMO is the only way to see it. I've seen it twice.
 

Bruce B

WBF Founding Member, Pro Audio Production Member
Apr 25, 2010
7,007
515
1,740
Snohomish, WA
www.pugetsoundstudios.com
I saw this on Friday in IMAX 3D... great special f/x. It's probably one of the first I wish was actually longer. I was expecting a little more at the end. Maybe it's sequel time?
 

Peter Breuninger

[Industry Expert] Member Sponsor
Jul 20, 2010
1,231
4
0
Just got back from seeing it in 3D Imax, OMFG. I was the best entertainment experience I've ever had. The sound? It makes high end audio seem like strings and a tin can. Unbelievable!!!
 

Bruce B

WBF Founding Member, Pro Audio Production Member
Apr 25, 2010
7,007
515
1,740
Snohomish, WA
www.pugetsoundstudios.com
Just got back from seeing it in 3D Imax, OMFG. I was the best entertainment experience I've ever had. The sound? It makes high end audio seem like strings and a tin can. Unbelievable!!!

I don't know about your experience, but I was kinda' distracted by the audio part. I was hearing too much going on behind me and WAY too loud!
 

Peter Breuninger

[Industry Expert] Member Sponsor
Jul 20, 2010
1,231
4
0
Our audio was spot on perfect. Some bozo tech must have screwed up your theater. Or some really cool tech adjusted our theater perfectly. I want to see it again.
 

DaveyF

Well-Known Member
Jul 31, 2010
6,129
181
458
La Jolla, Calif USA
Peter, isn't it interesting how a lot of these theater's have managed to give one some great sound. Many are overblown a little ( sometimes a lot) BUT in general, I find the sound to be very impressive. In the theater I saw the movie in, the previews were FAR too Boomy...yet when the movie played it was excellent on the audio front. There is obviously something to be said for huge halls with many large drivers in them. I do NOT think the precision or overall palpability of these systems actually can match our better home system's...However, the scale and ease of the commercial theater system is MIGHTY impressive. Now IF we could just combine both in our home systems....a VERY LARGE Hall would probably be a start, LOL.:)
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Co-Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing