Let the controversy ensue
http://www.ultraaudio.com/index.php...e-eight-things-you-need-to-know-from-ces-2013
http://www.ultraaudio.com/index.php...e-eight-things-you-need-to-know-from-ces-2013
Let the controversy ensue
http://www.ultraaudio.com/index.php...e-eight-things-you-need-to-know-from-ces-2013
Let the controversy ensue
http://www.ultraaudio.com/index.php...e-eight-things-you-need-to-know-from-ces-2013
That was actually rational. You need to go back to hyperbole school. The entry level Magicos look very nice.
Jeff,
Did you compare the Burmester and darTZeel against the Ayre? Did anyone else?
I know you don't like the daTZeel, for some reason I can't understand, but why pick on these two brands, in order to promote a third?
If you like Ayre, pick one of their products and review it. Want to prove how good they are? Put them up against another amp, in your room, and compare it.
And in case you want the answer, yes, Hervé is more talented than Hansen, at least for amps
Just for reference, I haven't found an amp costing 2x of my darTZeel that I'd rather have. So, in a way, it's actually CHEAP for me, since it performs better than amps costing much more.
If you'd rather have the Ayre at a fraction of the cost of the darTZeel, that's great for you, put it down in a review/comparison between the two! But empty pieces like what you wrote doesn't prove a point, it just boosts one brand while putting down two others.
And that Wadia? I won't even mention how ugly it is, as that is particular to each one. But there's very little innovative in it, unlike the Devialet, though I agree that it is only the first of the many "me too" copycats that will likely appear.
alexandre
I can certainly understand your reaction. But if you read the section closely . . . I picked the new Ayre precisely because no one has heard it yet. The question posed is why would we assume that the more expensive product is better? Is that assumption based entirely on price? Is that wise to assume, particularly when we know that part of that price difference is due to exchange rates and the distributor tier? How do those factors equate to better sound quality? They don't.
I don't know if the Ayre is better or not, and neither do you. But if you assume it is not, and that assumption is based on price, even partially, then you've helped me prove my point.
Is that assumption based entirely on price? Is that wise to assume, particularly when we know that part of that price difference is due to exchange rates and the distributor tier? How do those factors equate to better sound quality? They don't.
I don't know if the Ayre is better or not, and neither do you. But if you assume it is not, and that assumption is based on price, even partially, then you've helped me prove my point.
A point I have tried (apparently without any success) in another thread: We audiophiles contiue to equate performance with price. The more expensive the better in our world view.
LOL and I try to point out that there are those with the perspective price is not the primary high end variable, because entry level high end IS always improving
Case in point I feel Jeff makes, including the point about the anomalies that are not really high end even though they try to claim their product as such.
What I find intriguing, those complaining about high end prices NEVER praise entry high end or the attempts of Magico with their S1, Ayre, Wilson Audio Sophia3 compared to its higher priced models (requires to be a fan of WA - love/hate with a fair few consumers),etc.
At CES entry/accessible level high end products were also presented by Nagra, Ayre, Oracle, Burmester, T&A, Magico,Audio Research, Krell, Wadia, Classe,etc,etc,etc.
We have a thread over 38 pages, and nothing comparable about how great the entry high end is these days
So those that complain seem to fix on price and anomolies/statement models rather than the positives of the competitive/accessible high end and how financially accessible seriously well engineered-developed products are these days.
Yeah Steve the Atlantic/distributor-exchange rate-taxes/etc scenario makes it very very difficult to buy from across "the pond".
For myself this means it makes it very challenging to consider Ayre and its US peers over here in UK compared to the European manufacturers.
Sad but true for both sides of the Atlantic, especially when considering longer term and possible trade-in,etc.
Does generate challenges for manufacturers to compete on a level playing field in each region.
Cheers
Orb
Orb-I don't agree with the definition of "entry level" high-end gear that you gave John. I do think you did a good job of defining entry level by how the manufacturer's who make stratospherically priced gear would define it. If you told someone who wanted to get a good stereo system that a good entry level preamp would cost them $15K, they would probably look at you like you had three eyeballs and maybe lose interest in the hobby real quick. $15K is more than a Ref 5SE, and I don't think anyone would call that linestage an "entry level" product.
Your definition of entry level high end is basically the cheapest priced gear from a manufacturer who makes very expensive high-end products. The definition should be much broader and should cover gear that provides sound quality that moves you inside the tent of high-end sound at the cheapest possible price. I really think the words "entry level" with relation to purported high-end sound is almost a pejorative term meant to let people know where they stand in the audiophile pecking order. If someone told you that for an entry level high-end stereo system, you have pretty good sound, would that not be a left-handed compliment?
Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | Ron Resnick Site Co-Owner | Administrator | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |