Just say oops and pay a 3 billion dollar fine. 3 billion is nothing compared to the profits made on these drugs.
http://www.startribune.com/local/you...161408025.html
Just say oops and pay a 3 billion dollar fine. 3 billion is nothing compared to the profits made on these drugs.
http://www.startribune.com/local/you...161408025.html
Why did you call these "supplements?" These are prescription drugs that were being touted to perform miracle cures for things they had never been approved for. When I think of supplements. I think of vitamins.
Holy smokes! There are a whole bunch of Schedule I drugs that are Serotonin uptake inhibitors and they were marketing Paxil to kids?
More sleazy payoffs done by GSK to promote its drugs. How unethical was it for Pinsky not to disclose he was receiving payola from GSK to promote Welbutrin??????
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment...ntcmp=features
I wonder how GSK managed to withhold safety information. Did they miss the reporting deadline? How can a project team conspire to withhold information that they see in a study or is reported to their safety department. Also, those sales folks have quotas to reach, so I can see them promoting off label use, partly because that is less easily detected. The one thing that shock me most of all is that they tried to bribe doctors with Madonna concert tickets.
Well, this is why supplementary "medicines" should be regulated. Pharmaceuticals, which are regulated, can be punished if they make false or misleading claims. Supplementary medicines, in contrast, make wildly conflated claims and routinely get away with it.
Classical music enthusiast. System photos here.
Actually Keith that's not true since wild claims are a FDA red flag. They'll be shut down right away. And the number of supplements that have caused any harm is minuscule compared to the drugs prescribed by docs ans supposedly tested. Actually I can't think of any-ephedrine was BS and later studies showed that.
But this case is exactly wild and falsified claims.
Bookmarks