View Poll Results: Record/LP Storage

Voters
28. You may not vote on this poll
  • All labels are stored together and sorted by composer/artist/band

    13 46.43%
  • By record label and then composer/artist/band

    4 14.29%
  • By record label/catalog number w/no regard to composer/artist/group

    0 0%
  • They're computerized

    0 0%
  • Some combination of 1-4

    7 25.00%
  • I have a good memory

    6 21.43%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Storing Your LPs

  1. #1
    Member Sponsor [WBF Founding Member]
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    11,222

    Storing Your LPs

    Deleted
    Last edited by MylesBAstor; 11-05-2015 at 05:53 AM.

  2. #2
    [WBF Founding Member] vinylphilemag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Kelowna, BC
    Posts
    806
    Quote Originally Posted by MylesBAstor View Post
    Here's today pop quiz

    How do you arrange and catalog your records for easy retrieval - or to avoid losing a record?
    Definately the former. Roughly by genre (rock, pop, and jazz, followed by classical, then soundtracks. Oh, and 12" singles and boxed sets.), then alphabetically by artist and title.
    Rich Teer, Publisher
    Vinylphile Magazine

    www.vinylphilemag.com

  3. #3
    Addicted to Best! jadis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Manila, Philippines
    Posts
    5,934
    This has actually been quite difficult for me all my record life. I TRY to store them by labels, but only for the audiophile pressings - like Sheffield, RR, Chesky, etc. For jazz, I can still stick with labels groupings, but for pop that's where I go by male and female artists. Classical will be in a bunch too. But problem is with my newly acquired bunch. I have to group them as a separate category regardless of genre because when I shove them into their genre bunch, I tend to forget their existence. So definitely, I did not vote for the last choice. LOL.

  4. #4
    Member Sponsor [WBF Founding Member] Johnny Vinyl's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    Posts
    8,565
    Couldn't vote as I've always alphabetized by group/performer name. The only exceptions are Classical recordings, Soundtracks and Boxsets.
    I love the smell of vinyl in the morning!
    John Adrian Spijkers - "Live Life! Leave A Legacy!"
    Dynavector DV20x2L - Genesis G7.1f - Marantz Reference PM KI Pearl - Nitty Gritty 2.5Fi - Oracle Paris Mk.V

  5. #5

    Wink None of the above! Et tu Myles?

    Myles, can I suggest you re-title this thread because it's about cataloging and/or arranging a record collection, a very interesting topic. But it's definitely not about record storage, something that's been discussed ad nauseam anyway! I voted 'Good Memory' (NOT!) just to view the poll. In fact, my LP and CD collections are organized by content! Because, to me, that's what this whole thing is all about -- listening to music that you want to hear.

    My primary motivation when selecting/retrieving something for playback is either, "What kind of music (including instrument and/or performance) am I in the mood to hear?" -- or, if I haven't got something in mind, then I just browse my (content-based) categories until something winks at me I've found that content-based LP/CD organization leads to less vacillating and much more music listening -- important these days when time always seem to be in short supply. For years, even before computers, I used to divide my collection between classical and everything else, then alphabetically by composer or writer/performer. And you know what? It took me forever to find something to play, and often as not, it wasn't what I really wanted to hear!

    I guess one could also maintain a searchable computer database, if desired. What led to my rethinking all this though, was a few years back, when I became friends with a truly compulsive collector, as in: thousands of records! And yet, his 'thousands of records' were organized only by content. Not a slob by any means, yet he is the complete opposite of "anal retentive", whatever that is called. He had nothing written down or databased, and when I asked why he didn't maintain some kind of list, he said it would be a waste of time; that he knew where all the "special goodies" were; and if anyone had a request he wasn't sure about, he could find out if he had it in about ten seconds! And he could care less about having instant info about all his Toscaninis, or 1/2 speed masters, shaded dogs, or whatever. What's important to him is: What kind of music do I want to listen to right NOW!

    I was defintely intrigued, but of course, resistant to change, especially change which meant dismantling everything I worked so hard to organize! But I slowly began creating little sections for certain content I listened to a lot, like Guitar, Jazz, Orchestral, Brass. Later these became Guitar:jazz, Guitar:classical. Or Jazz:instumentals, Jazz:vocals, Jazz:soloist, as my preferances became more defined. The result was a kind of confidence I could quickly find something I would enjoy right at that moment. I would no longer be intimidated by my own record collection -- and damn the Dewey Decimal System!!

  6. #6
    Senior Member/Sponsor Addicted to Best! Joe Galbraith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    215
    Unfortunately, mine are in random order, with the exception of the rack of "heavy rotation" titles (<1,000), these are in bins arranged only by genre. Having well over 5K LPs makes life interesting this way. My reel to reel tapes are in reasonable order though. Somehow I know pretty much the neighborhood where things reside.

    This surprises a lot of people given the fact that I am a Library Director. That is precisely why I do it. I am surrounded by cataloged, described, arranged information all day. I like a little disorder in my personal life
    Turntable and Carts Walker Audio Proscenium Gold Signature TT, BluElectric Magic Diamond & Allnic Puritas carts
    Phono stage Allnic H3000
    Line stage Allnic L3000
    Amps Quicksilver Audio M135 Mono
    Cables Silent Source Silver Signature & The Music Reference, Synergistic Research Tesla LE
    Speakers Kharma 2.2 Ce, Rel subs (2)
    Room Treatment Quest AI, RPG Variscreens, Mioculture Acoustic Weave

  7. #7
    Addicted to Best! theophile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Sunshine Coast. Queensland. Australia.
    Posts
    205
    Alphabetical.

    I know the artist. I know the alphabet. No problem.
    Turntable/Arm - Yamaha GT 2000/Yamaha YSA-1
    Cartridge - Soundsmith The Voice(Ebony)
    Phono stage - Moon LP 5.3
    Preamp - Hornshoppe The Truth
    Speakers - KRK Expose E8B Mastering Monitors

    Turntable support counts as another component. 21 Clearaudio Magix and more.

  8. #8
    [WBF Founding Member] kach22i's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Ann Arbor, Michigan
    Posts
    974
    I have mine set up to closely resemble that of a record store, music categories "genres". And do the same with my CD's.

    Alphabetical from there.

    In lieu of new releases I have a stack of stuff which I've never listened to and have yet to clean and sort.
    George, Architect
    M/L Aerius + Tubes + Vinyl

Similar Threads

  1. Recording LPs
    By MylesBAstor in forum Reel To Reel Tape Deck and Content Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-13-2016, 09:22 AM
  2. Do you have any 'autographed' LPs or CDs?
    By jadis in forum Turntables
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 03-11-2012, 02:59 PM
  3. Cataloging and storing your LP's---who does it and how?
    By DaveyF in forum General Music Discussion Forum
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 02-29-2012, 09:24 AM
  4. Wilson LPs
    By jadis in forum General Music Discussion Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-09-2011, 05:22 PM
  5. LPs of new release music
    By amirm in forum General Audio Forum
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 12-02-2010, 01:31 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •