Two different versions of Nothing else matters, wich one do you prefer. ?????
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1Rg6nuZoQM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=At0A-...eature=related
Two different versions of Nothing else matters, wich one do you prefer. ?????
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1Rg6nuZoQM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=At0A-...eature=related
Chord CPM-2600 integrated amplifier Chord One cd player Acoustat 1+1 speakers ( 1984 ) Acoustat heaven on earth.
Interesting. Well, its 2200 hrs and maybe because its been a long hot day, but really, I prefer the girls, but almost always IMO, for reproduction, the less going on the easier it is to listen to, and just a piano and gals singing is easy for the amplifier and speakers to get right compared to the other version, the male voices a bit hard, the crash of symbals a bit hard, etc.
Tom
Tom
____
It's impossible for stereo two channel mic/speakers to realistically replicate unamplified musical events. The resulting unrealistic reproduction must be accepted or leaves some desiring more. Some endlessly change components pursuing the impossible. With 10 being realistic replication, I generously give stereo a rating of 5 for "getting me there". I rate binaural via headphones 8. I pursue detail/tone over soundstage. Objectivists and Subjectivists debate an ILLUSION!
I like the girls more(surprise, surprise) but the Gregorian "Comfortably Numb" is fab.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks