Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Demystifying budget phono preamps

  1. #11
    WBF Technical Expert (Speakers & Audio Equipment) garylkoh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    3,411
    Don,
    you HAD to bite didn't you? I found alkalines "grainy", nickel cadmiums less dynamic, and heavy-duty the best of the lot (this is time prehistoric before metal hydrides, etc.) This is NOT on the Hagerman - it was some Swiss 2-inch by 8inch black box that I got rid of abut 20 years ago. I can't even remember the name of the thing......

    The Hagerman is so cheap that I may just buy a kit and see how far I can take it...... OPA 2170 opamps, Vishay metal foil 0.01% resistors, WIMA caps.......
    __________________________
    Gary L Koh
    CEO, Genesis Advanced Technologies
    Please come LIKE our page at http://www.facebook.com/GenesisAdvancedTechnologies
    www.genesisloudspeakers.com, www.absolutefidelity.com

  2. #12
    WBF Technical Expert
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Monument, CO
    Posts
    2,498
    Well, come on, somebody was gonna'!

    Rather than raise/debate the audibiity of this that and the other, I'll just comment that what very little I know of battery characteristics would agree with your asessments from the technical side. Alkalines offer higher power than standard carbon but noise characteristics very widely -- some better, some worse. NiCd cells tend to have lower voltage and lower peak current due to higher self-resistance, which could cause the dynamic issues you heard. Some of the early battery preamps (don't know anything about today's) sucked a lot of juice and it's possible the batteries weren't up to it.

    One thing I observed many years ago, again may not be the case today, is that a lot of battery-powered components had very poor power supply designs. Just hooking a battery straight to the opamp (or whatever) is not always best. A battery is cool and eliminates line hum, at least from e.g. the power transformer, but does NOT obviate the need for proper decoupling, filtering, and shielding. It is not a perfect (ideal) power source.

    All imo, since I'm far too lazy to dig up references, and besides I have dress rehearsal tonight so will be busy making music instead of listening to it - Don
    Don Herman
    "After silence, that which best expresses the inexpressible, is music" - Aldous Huxley

  3. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Vancouver B.C.
    Posts
    73
    I was considering modding mine for tape pre duty. Someone posted the R values for nab and IEC curves... Thoughts?

  4. #14
    Member JoeyGS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Laguna, Philippines
    Posts
    44
    Luxman PD 441, Technics SL1210 M5G, Modified MF VLPS with Cinemag SUT, Modified Jolida JD9a, CAPS Zuma V3 with Vortex Box OS/Player, iFi USB Power, Twisted Pear's Buffalo Dac II, DIY CD ROM, 6922 Aikido w/ Lightspeed as Volume Attenuator, Lightspeed, 150w Gainclone Monoblocks, Living Voice Auditorium, Magnepan SMGc

  5. #15
    Addicted to Best! Shaffer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    NYS
    Posts
    284
    Quote Originally Posted by JoeyGS View Post
    I'd really like to check out this piece in my system.
    - Felix

  6. #16
    WBF Founding Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    6,216
    Quote Originally Posted by Shaffer View Post
    I'd really like to check out this piece in my system.
    The price is right. Go for it.

  7. #17
    Addicted to Best! Shaffer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    NYS
    Posts
    284
    Quote Originally Posted by mep View Post
    The price is right. Go for it.
    There are a couple of pieces I'm looking at, this being one. It's just that I live in RFI hell and a home audition is almost mandatory. No local dealer, at least no one who likes me. Ultimately, I have my mind set on the Ayre phono stage. I had one in my K-1. Running the system balanced from input to output really made a HUGE difference in my environment.
    - Felix

  8. #18
    By sheer accident I came across something a bit 'counter intuitive' using a low price phonostage. I borrowed a Cambridge 640p, because my, pricey 'real' phonos,tage was being fixed. Anyway, just out of curiosity, I used my expensive step up (music first) to bypass the mc stage of the Cambridge.The result was quite dramatic, the 640p with the top quality sut, was transformed. it sounded every bit as good as phonostages at $2000, which the 'ordinary' 640p certainly didn't.which leads me to wonder if that first step, where the tiny signal meets the electronics and changes from movement to an electronic signal , is the really difficult trick. Or to ask another question, could a good sut, into a bargain phonostage, outperform a more balanced phonostage? it sounds implausible, but my ears suggest there just might be something in it.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Ice-cold preamps
    By flez007 in forum Amplification/Preamplification
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12-30-2011, 10:43 AM
  2. Passive Preamps
    By Steve Williams in forum Amplification/Preamplification
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 12-21-2011, 09:56 PM
  3. Warmer Audio Research preamps
    By KeithR in forum Audio Research
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-01-2011, 09:50 PM
  4. Replies: 19
    Last Post: 01-08-2011, 05:59 PM
  5. Best values in audio gear for the budget minded audiophile
    By caesar in forum General Audio Discussions
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 10-13-2010, 04:17 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •