Untitled Document

Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 43

Thread: High Fidelity and Preferences

  1. #1
    Member Sponsor [WBF Founding Member] FrantzM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    6,469

    High Fidelity and Preferences

    Long Post.

    Hi


    I had wanted to write this post for a while... Never could carve the time to do so …

    I will try as much as possible to de-personalize this post but that shall remain difficult so please bear with me…

    I have been in this High End thing for a while about 40 years or maybe more. I have had an audiophile father, audiophile friends of my father and a family deep into music with a niece studying the Violin and Western Classical music...
    I have followed the High End Audio scene for a good while... In the beginning I did follow both the American and the French High End Audio scene, and then it was mainly the American although the electronics that have provided me with the best results are German (Burmester).

    In the beginning Audio reproduction in the house was about to bring the performers in our home. We needed to have High Fidelity. We were trying as hard as possible to reproduce what we heard in a live performance in our home… The goal proved very difficult, even impossible... So we lowered our expectations... We begin to admit that such goal was impossible rather than trying to push the limits we strayed … It was no longer about Hi-Fi we will mess with the signal and qualify the results .. However remote they became from the original signals.

    Now let’s admit that we have preferences... I am always fascinated by the interplay of the violins in an orchestra, I also like the sound of cello and the way the violins interplay with the violins … I simply like the sound of an oboe and consider the horns like something that I must resign myself to listen to in music (IOW they have a purpose) but I prefer the sound of the woodwinds not of the brass.. I like the startle caused by a line from the double bass sustained by the whack of the percussion, mostly or other big drums. It seems to bring a power to the piece being played a gravitas if you will. Those are my preferences and I can understand that they would play a role in my choice of equipment: I like Full range systems. Call them Big Systems. I want real dynamics everywhere my hearing reaches. From down low to as high as I can (presently) perceive … No “oh but the midrange is soooo nice” I want full range wide dynamic range and purity in ALL registers. Thus my systems have tended toward large speakers with good dynamics or at least that what I know now. I dabbed in Quad and Martin Logan CLS ESL and no matter how much I admired the midband , I was always dissatisfied with the rendition … polite and always lacking of the visceral that makes music alive for me … Give me the IRS V ( I know people it is surpassed) or rather the Genesis 1, Give me the Maggies any of them but the 20.1 remains a favorite , give me the Dunleavy designs, the Von Schweikert , the Soundlabs or the X-2 with serious amplifiers some wattage and I am pleased .. Those are my preferences …

    Thus the notion of “preferences “which is pervading the High End IMHO and taking it in a strange and in my opinion nefarious direction. I do understand that within the whole audible range there are preferences. Some like bass some like treble some like mid bass.. Since we can’t have a system that it does it all well we choose within those preferences or rather we should .. What I am seeing is the rise of systems that have no relationship whatever with the reality of a sound and that is becoming the norm.. . The preferences have become what sound pleasing even the music (message) wasn’t pleasing to begin with… Varese is supposed to sound dissonant and unsettling if it does not your system is wrong … Such euphonic systems are easily accepted by the audiophile world in the name of “musicality”. On the other hand when a kid fit his car with 10,000 of bass amplifier and enough 18-inch drivers to unscrew everything around his car, we find this system wrong … The chorus is that the subwoofer AKA car system is wrong .. We find Bose LifeStyle systems wrong and frankly we know they are is wrong.. We know the sound is not good… But if “preferences” are all that matters how wrong can a Bose be? That is what its owner like ….
    I am trying to point to the fact that there may have to be some sense in all this there must be some references even if our preferences allow us to choose within the infinite possibilities that this entails… Euphony has become too much what the High End Audio is trending toward …

    What do you think people? What are your views on the reproduction.. Aren’t we abandoning the very notion of High Fidelity where does that take us .. I would suggest : Not in a good place….
    Frantz
    __________________________________

    "For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring."
    —Carl Sagan
    "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction."
    — E. F. Schumacher
    (mis-attributed to A. Einstein)

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    16,044
    I think you are correct Frantz. I think we all create a vision of fidelity and then chase components that match them. We like to think that means true to the original presentation. After all, thinking otherwise means we have violated the definition of the term.

    I post in another thread that it is impossible to ever know what was recorded. We don't know what the creative talent who approved the recording heard. So the reality that we chase must be false. I used the word "pretty sound." I know I have my definition of pretty sound. That is what we are chasing as you put it.

    For me the epiphany came when SACD and DVD-A were introduced. I bought the same title on each format (and CD) from Chesky and no less than 5 players comprising both formats. The "winner" was Sony SACD player. The sound had more resolution, and luscious. I then go to AES conference hearing and hear David Chesky say he had captured, and edited those tracks using PCM and at the end, converted them to SACD. Clearly, I was preferring a transformation of sound to the original. Yes, it is possible the other three DVD-A players were less performing but still, does make one think.

    The second experience came from talking to an audiophile who had gone to a recording session with Keith Johnson. They heard the music live and then the mixed version by Keith. To his horror, he did not find Keith's recording anything like the original presentation. He asked Keith about it. Keith apparently said that it is his job to create a pleasing mix that is enjoyable to listeners, not necessarily a carbon copy of the live presentation.

    The elephant in the room is the level of honesty that we bring to these discussions. For most, it is extremely hard to accept they are chasing a fiction and not reality. The need to be right outweighs the need to know more. It is human nature.

  3. #3
    [WBF Founding Member] Gregadd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Metro DC
    Posts
    6,296
    I prefer the term illusion not fiction. It's like the illusionists. We know he can't levitate the beautiful assistant, but we marvel at his ability to make it appear as though he can.
    I would say human perception rather than preference. What factros do I require to suspend disbelief?

    With respect to Keith Johnson of Spectral fame. If it has either been Keiths' goal to produce "pleasing" recordings or equipment, he is a resounding failure. He makes of some of the most neutral recordings and equipment I have ever heard.
    Last edited by Gregadd; 01-31-2011 at 09:37 AM.
    Be civil to all, sociable to many, familiar with few, friendly to one, and enemy to none.
    Benjamin Franklin

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    16,044
    Let me make sure the Keith Johnson bit doesn't get translated into anything else: I said pleasing mix. By mix I do not mean that he is adding effects and such but rather, the sensation of being there is different when you listen to the music vs recorded. At least this is what was conveyed to me . I took this as the soundstage and such not being the same as the live session.

  5. #5
    [WBF Founding Member] Ron Party's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Oakland, CA
    Posts
    2,457
    Great and deep thoughts by both of you, particularly for a Monday morning.

    Quote Originally Posted by amirm View Post
    The elephant in the room is the level of honesty that we bring to these discussions. For most, it is extremely hard to accept they are chasing a fiction and not reality. The need to be right outweighs the need to know more. It is human nature.
    Gary, are you reading what Amir posted? Sounds like the makings of another good dialectic.
    Peace.

    Ron Party

  6. #6
    VIP/Donor [VIP/Donor] microstrip's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    13,240
    Quote Originally Posted by FrantzM View Post
    Now let’s admit that we have preferences... I am always fascinated by the interplay of the violins in an orchestra, I also like the sound of cello and the way the violins interplay with the violins … I simply like the sound of an oboe and consider the horns like something that I must resign myself to listen to in music (IOW they have a purpose) but I prefer the sound of the woodwinds not of the brass.. I like the startle caused by a line from the double bass sustained by the whack of the percussion, mostly or other big drums. It seems to bring a power to the piece being played a gravitas if you will. Those are my preferences and I can understand that they would play a role in my choice of equipment: I like Full range systems. Call them Big Systems. I want real dynamics everywhere my hearing reaches. From down low to as high as I can (presently) perceive … No “oh but the midrange is soooo nice” I want full range wide dynamic range and purity in ALL registers. Thus my systems have tended toward large speakers with good dynamics or at least that what I know now. I dabbed in Quad and Martin Logan CLS ESL and no matter how much I admired the midband , I was always dissatisfied with the rendition … polite and always lacking of the visceral that makes music alive for me … Give me the IRS V ( I know people it is surpassed) or rather the Genesis 1, Give me the Maggies any of them but the 20.1 remains a favorite , give me the Dunleavy designs, the Von Schweikert , the Soundlabs or the X-2 with serious amplifiers some wattage and I am pleased .. Those are my preferences …
    Although I do not hide my head bellow a pillow at the begging of Tchaikovsky Forth (Yevgeny Mravinsky and Leningrad Philharmonic Orchestra, surely) we share the same fascination for the interplay in classical music. I love chamber music and chamber music also relies on this interplay. In order to have it you must have fantastic micro-dynamics and and perfect gradation of sound intensity, either when going down or going up in power. HP of TAS called it continuousness, I like the idea of ""subtlety".

    Big symphonic masses can become boring without this feeling.

    How does this translate in equipment? As you say sometimes also we need visceral impact, that suggest the power of a previous life experience, but also need to feel that the performer is just waiting that the note of the piano decreases to a certain point to chain his violin - that there is something going in the air... But as Amir just noted, each of us has his solution to recreate this space, independently of the equipment and media.

    I have found that this property is a system property - you can have it with tube, transistors, panels or dynamic speakers. But is is a condition with fragile equilibrium, and sometimes even a small and inoffensive change can spoil it.

  7. #7
    I think the "Absolute Sound" is a platonic ideal, kind of like a perfectly carved Greek statue or an attempt to breed a perfect horse. The reality is that the live music experience differs by our mood, physical well being and parameters, and placement of our seats. As for re-creating it at home, we are subjected to the wide variation in recording quality. Since I accept this is only a hobby, I would prefer my gear to be engineered to sound good with most of the recordings so I can focus on the musical enjoyment rather than on the flaws of the recording.

  8. #8
    [WBF Founding Member] Gregadd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Metro DC
    Posts
    6,296
    An ideal is just that. Once it was an ideal that we would map the human genome or clone living beings.
    Be civil to all, sociable to many, familiar with few, friendly to one, and enemy to none.
    Benjamin Franklin

  9. #9
    Member Sponsor [WBF Founding Member] FrantzM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    6,469
    Quote Originally Posted by Gregadd View Post
    An ideal is just that. Once it was an ideal that we would map the human genome or clone living beings.
    Hi

    An ideal doesn't have to be perfectly attainable to be worthwhile.. peace on earth a or immortality are among these but working toward reaching an ideal is always worthwhile .. Approaching it makes thing better for those involved .. We know we will never reach Peace on Earth or uncover all the Mysteries of the Universe but shouldn't we pursue these?

    Same in Audio Reproduction... We have an ideal to reproduce what usually is with the utmost fidelity .. We will never approach it but we can always come closer to it ... Just abandoning it is not much of a pursuit ... What I am seeing now is that there is no goal only preferences, some call this Audio Relativism... And it becomes what ..a strange continuum from the Bose Lifestyle and boomboxes i mentioned earlier to Megabucks systems .. Are they ALL good, just because someone likes them?

    I read with great attention Tomelex attitude toward this: Make sure that your system is a neutral as possible then add whatever you want... Seems to be an interesting recipe ..first do no harm then harm the results to your heart content ... that is not what is happening in the High End : In several instances we are deviating from this neutral ideal ... Very much .. too much and all kind of terms are assigned to the results ..None of them resemble accuracy .. So what are we after? Anything goes? Bose goes?
    Frantz
    __________________________________

    "For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring."
    —Carl Sagan
    "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction."
    — E. F. Schumacher
    (mis-attributed to A. Einstein)

  10. #10
    WBF Technical Expert (Speakers & Audio Equipment)/Member Sponsor [Technical Expert] garylkoh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    5,417
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Party View Post
    Great and deep thoughts by both of you, particularly for a Monday morning.

    Gary, are you reading what Amir posted? Sounds like the makings of another good dialectic.
    Excellent thoughts from both Frantz and Amir - a good dialectic should be able to run its course anywhere in this forum. That is the hallmark of a good forum.

    I absolutely agree with Frantz - an ideal need not be attainable in our lifetimes, and it is the journey towards that ideal that is worthwhile. The ideal may also not be the same for everyone - our vision of the ideal is our vision only. I like what Gregadd and Amir came up with - we are chasing an illusion. I had a similar experience as Amir - being in a recording session and discovering that the end result was a mix that was much more enjoyable than being inside the studio during the recording.

    This is because the recording engineers are doing exactly the same thing as tomelex is doing - recording to as neutral (high fidelity?) as possible, and then using tone controls and processors to get the mix that they think would be most pleasing. With the recording engineer using multiple mics for each instrument at different distances, additional ambience mics, tape loop reverb, compressors, etc. etc. we can never know what the musicians intended even before the recording engineer got into the picture.

    My personal philosophy is "First do no harm" - I don't want my components to color, editorialize, filter or enhance any part of the music. That is why when I evaluate components, I will use both well recorded as well as badly recorded music. There is much to learn whenever I listen to a component using badly recorded but excellently performed good music, or excellently recorded but a poor performance.
    __________________________
    Gary L Koh, CEO and Chief Designer,
    Genesis Advanced Technologies

Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. High Fidelity Jazz Find
    By amirm in forum Jazz Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 02-21-2011, 03:41 PM
  2. Mobile Fidelity
    By MylesBAstor in forum Turntables
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 01-05-2011, 04:31 PM
  3. Comparative Fidelity
    By RBFC in forum Tuners, Satellite Radio and Internet Radio Forun
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 12-21-2010, 07:46 PM
  4. Are There Cross-Cultural Preferences in Quality of Reproduced Sound?
    By tonmeister2008 in forum Science In The Service Of Art/Dr. Sean Olive
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 12-14-2010, 08:37 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •