Dan D'Agostino Relentless Mono Power-amplifier

microstrip

VIP/Donor
May 30, 2010
20,806
4,698
2,790
Portugal
yeah...seen it in the flesh..and whilst i can understand the economic sales logic...customer wants...prepared to pay...dCS provides....still feel it diminishes the brand

as I have never seen dCS as bling...

serious digital engineering yes.....shiny bobbles ....not so much ...YMMV

I can't see how a luxurious quality finish diminishes the brand ... Although I would not like to have my stack in gold, it is a question of personnel taste and I respect other people liking. DCS have other expensive special finishes that I would not mind owning, although I did not want to pay for it purely for monetary reasons.

These expensive brands respect and try to match the esthetic preference of a few of their possible clients, for whom money is not an issue. Why are they "diminishing the brand"?
 

microstrip

VIP/Donor
May 30, 2010
20,806
4,698
2,790
Portugal
(....) Thus there is a convolution between form and function, where many manufacturers would claim their expensive casework is not just for looks but also for function...this is quesitonable and often is. (...)


As questionable as using several tens of kilograms of iron to power a device consuming a few watts ... :)

More seriously, long ago a friend and I built some famous amplifier replicas for ourselves, using factory supplied service modules. At that time we found that just using different heatsinks changed their sound. This has opened my mind to this kind of debates.

Non believers should try an old test. Open your amplifier, connect it to a 4 ohm 100W power resistor and drive it at the levels you would use to drive your speakers very loud. Then listen in silence. If there is any sound, it means that some energy is being robed from the electrical signal, probably distorting it.
 

BMCG

VIP/Donor
Oct 1, 2016
234
41
133
United Kingdom
Why are they "diminishing the brand"?

To my ears, i'd prefer to see dCS continue to advance the frontier of digital reproduction, as they 've done for much of their history

Granted this is me as technologist ...as opposed to marketer ... and I dare say the dCS bottom line benefits from the upgraded finishes..but to me their brand is: digital reproduction excellence.

It mildly bothers that they brought the external finishes to market as part of their 30th anniversary celebrations rather than say a new digital innovation that advanced my listening pleasure.

In search of an analogy....i've just seen the latest Porsche GT2 RS up close..it is as if, hewn from a solid ingot, i love the engineering...some might see the outrageous rear wing and over wrought front air intakes as bling...to me they shape air under extreme conditions to blitz the 'Ring.....i get form shaped to fulfil function, Bauhaus....it's logical :) ...
 

thedudeabides

Well-Known Member
Jan 16, 2011
2,126
651
1,200
Alto, NM
Your position is that audio is different from watches or similar luxury purchases. Why would anyone buy a Patek or Vacheron when a $90 Casio sync'd to a atomic clock is guaranteed to keep better time. So it isn't a price/performance issue.

With all due respect, I wonder if you would feel different if you didn't own D'ag amps. Regarding hi-end watches, I must admit I've never understood the "bling / look at me" factor. :cool:
 

knghifi

Well-Known Member
Dec 6, 2014
255
70
158
I've been a fan of Dan's since his Krell days. To my ear, Agas line is a MAJOR MAJOR improvement over Krells. My reservation, Dan is 80+ years old so what's going to happen to Agas company when time is up? Will service be available? There's only one Dan Agastino so will it transition similar to Ayre?
 

still-one

VIP/Donor
Aug 6, 2012
1,633
150
1,220
Milford, Michigan
With all due respect, I wonder if you would feel different if you didn't own D'ag amps. Regarding hi-end watches, I must admit I've never understood the "bling / look at me" factor. :cool:

If I didn't own D'Agostino gear any manufacturer I considered would still have to have to provide nice industrial design. I am not going to sit and listen for hours on end and stare a something that isn't pleasing to both my eyes and ears. I don't want to offend anyone so I won't comment on products I would never own due to their industrial design no matter how great they sound.
 

thedudeabides

Well-Known Member
Jan 16, 2011
2,126
651
1,200
Alto, NM
I agree that gear can be aesthetically pleasing and, like art, it's all subjective. IMO, the most prominent piece of any system is the speakers and those should hopefully be "eye candy" for the listener.

My gear has always been "off to the side" of my speakers so I never pay much visual attention to it.
 

still-one

VIP/Donor
Aug 6, 2012
1,633
150
1,220
Milford, Michigan
I agree that gear can be aesthetically pleasing and, like art, it's all subjective. IMO, the most prominent piece of any system is the speakers and those should hopefully be "eye candy" for the listener.

My gear has always been "off to the side" of my speakers so I never pay much visual attention to it.

With a few a of my past speakers being Dahlquist DQ-10's, B&W 802D's, MBL 111F's and now X2's by speakers have always been oddly designed.
 

thedudeabides

Well-Known Member
Jan 16, 2011
2,126
651
1,200
Alto, NM
I also owned the DQ 10's with the Sequerra "cyclops" ribbon tweeter (my first hi-end speaker) and the MBL 116. Odd indeed.
 

GaryProtein

VIP/Donor
Jul 25, 2012
2,542
31
385
NY


I could go for three pair of the Relentless for my active three way system and I wouldn't even give a second thought to the $750K to buy them, but I just don't feel like upgrading the air conditioning in my listening room to handle the added heat. :cool: :cool: :cool:
 

Sharp 1080

Member
Apr 20, 2010
284
9
18
Dallas,Texas
I could go for three pair of the Relentless for my active three way system and I wouldn't even give a second thought to the $750K to buy them, but I just don't feel like upgrading the air conditioning in my listening room to handle the added heat. :cool: :cool: :cool:

Ha,ha Gary! The Relentless won't heat up the room like tube monoblocks can in a matter of minutes. My Progression monoblocks are barely warm to the touch. ;)
 

KeithR

VIP/Donor
May 7, 2010
5,144
2,812
1,898
Encino, CA
what's funny is I'd rather have the new Pass XA25 for a spin rather than these hulks. Maybe monoblock 'em even if possible
 

thedudeabides

Well-Known Member
Jan 16, 2011
2,126
651
1,200
Alto, NM
I wouldn't even give a second thought to the $750K to buy them, but I just don't feel like upgrading the air conditioning in my listening room to handle the added heat. :cool: :cool: :cool:

If they run cool and you don't have to upgrade your AC system, like another post indicated, why don't you buy them? :cool:
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Co-Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing