Does Today's Mid-fi gear Beat any HiFi gear from the 1970s? Or is it all drek?

Al M.

VIP/Donor
Sep 10, 2013
8,786
4,543
1,213
Greater Boston
Thank you

The Schiit Modi DAC ($ 99) probably beats any $ 500 turntable from the 1970s. The $ 65 class D amp (see link) that I bought for break-in of my speakers probably beats some decent Hi-Fi amps from the 1970s. Seriously, it's astonishingly good.

So yes, today you can get decent quality for a much cheaper price.
 

bonzo75

Member Sponsor
Feb 26, 2014
22,628
13,653
2,710
London
The iPod beats most CD players from the 70s
 

jeff1225

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2012
3,013
3,265
1,410
51
The Schiit Modi DAC ($ 99) probably beats any $ 500 turntable from the 1970s. The $ 65 class D amp (see link) that I bought for break-in of my speakers probably beats some decent Hi-Fi amps from the 1970s. Seriously, it's astonishingly good.

So yes, today you can get decent quality for a much cheaper price.

Haha that's a funny comparison.
 

morricab

Well-Known Member
Apr 25, 2014
9,491
5,044
1,228
Switzerland
The Schiit Modi DAC ($ 99) probably beats any $ 500 turntable from the 1970s. The $ 65 class D amp (see link) that I bought for break-in of my speakers probably beats some decent Hi-Fi amps from the 1970s. Seriously, it's astonishingly good.

So yes, today you can get decent quality for a much cheaper price.

I doubt the Schiit DAC beats a decent 70s TT ($500 was a lot of money for a TT in the 1970s...or do you mean $500 now...doesn't matter, I can take a Pioneer PL50 or Denon DP-47 for $500 today).

I won't speculate on the amps...
 

Empirical Audio

Industry Expert
Oct 12, 2017
1,169
207
150
Great Pacific Northwest
www.empiricalaudio.com
Try a Sony HAP-z1es. You would have to spend a lot to match that performance with a preamp, turntable, cartridge.
 

Al M.

VIP/Donor
Sep 10, 2013
8,786
4,543
1,213
Greater Boston
I doubt the Schiit DAC beats a decent 70s TT ($500 was a lot of money for a TT in the 1970s...or do you mean $500 now...doesn't matter, I can take a Pioneer PL50 or Denon DP-47 for $500 today).

Sorry, meant today's dollars (ca. $ 100 back then).
 

GaryProtein

VIP/Donor
Jul 25, 2012
2,542
31
385
NY
The iPod beats most CD players from the 70s


There were no CD players in the 1970s. :cool:

The CD player wasn't introduced until October 1982 :)

The iPod sure beat the walkmen.
 

bonzo75

Member Sponsor
Feb 26, 2014
22,628
13,653
2,710
London

microstrip

VIP/Donor
May 30, 2010
20,807
4,700
2,790
Portugal
The Schiit Modi DAC ($ 99) probably beats any $ 500 turntable from the 1970s.

"Probably" not IMHO ... We are debating preferences, I can not see how people use the word "beat" in such context. But at that time $500 would get me an excellent Thorens turntable that I risk saying I would surely prefer to a current $99 DAC.

The $ 65 class D amp (see link) that I bought for break-in of my speakers probably beats some decent Hi-Fi amps from the 1970s. Seriously, it's astonishingly good.

So yes, today you can get decent quality for a much cheaper price.

You are a lucky and happy audiophile - never found anything at such prices that I could like. But yes, we can find decent quality at nice prices.
 

Al M.

VIP/Donor
Sep 10, 2013
8,786
4,543
1,213
Greater Boston
You are a lucky and happy audiophile - never found anything at such prices that I could like. But yes, we can find decent quality at nice prices.

Yes, I found it rather enjoyable, even though perhaps not for all music. Quite dynamic and clean, quite good tonality (even though perhaps not without some irritating details), very good bass. Let's look at it that way: My Octave amp costs 200 x more. Is it 200 times better? No ;).

But is it much better? You bet.
 

Al M.

VIP/Donor
Sep 10, 2013
8,786
4,543
1,213
Greater Boston
"Probably" not IMHO ... We are debating preferences, I can not see how people use the word "beat" in such context. But at that time $500 would get me an excellent Thorens turntable that I risk saying I would surely prefer to a current $99 DAC.

Yes, sorry, I already corrected myself on this one. I meant $ 500 in today's money, which would have been approximately $ 100 then.
 

BlueFox

Member Sponsor
Nov 8, 2013
1,709
406
405
thank you for what ??? You posted a useless thread..... 'thank you' !

LOL. Yes. On the other hand, a thread comparing today’s inexpensive hi-fi to high end hi-fi might be useful. For example, my previous stereo was a Cambridge Audio 840E preamp, and two 840W amps in bridged mono mode. Total price was less than my current Pass preamp. However, I suspect the CA gear was giving me at least 90% of what the Pass does. Only at really insane SPLs does the Pass really stand out.
 

Al M.

VIP/Donor
Sep 10, 2013
8,786
4,543
1,213
Greater Boston

BlueFox

Member Sponsor
Nov 8, 2013
1,709
406
405
I don't find it useless; it has some interesting perspective to it...almost fifty years of it.

What perspective is that? CD players didn’t exist in the 70s? $500 turntables now were $100 then? An inexpensive DAC now is better than an old turntable? WTF kind of a comparison is that? LOL :)
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Co-Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing