Low capacitance cables

Empirical Audio

Industry Expert
Oct 12, 2017
1,169
207
150
Great Pacific Northwest
www.empiricalaudio.com
It's trivially easy to make low-C cables, but other more balanced approaches work much better ime.

With no insulation on the wires?? With low susceptibility? With low dielectric absorption?

Not so trivial.

Steve N.
 

microstrip

VIP/Donor
May 30, 2010
20,806
4,698
2,790
Portugal
What kid of a metric is cutoff? I can hear 1dB of roll-off. See my updated calculation above.

You are now multiplying your previously suggested typical output impedance by 20 - an extreme case that seldom happens and using a 2m cable. IMHO it only proves that in extreme situations capacity matters, but not to 99% of people using typical cables.

I have checked many cables and excepting Kubala Sosna, all were bellow 100 pF/meter. Surely I agree with you that manufacturers could supply cable capacitance. They probably choose not to do it because 99% of users would make an erroneous use of it. Evidently professional cable manufacturers supply it - it is almost mandatory for long cables and professionals need it.
 

microstrip

VIP/Donor
May 30, 2010
20,806
4,698
2,790
Portugal
With no insulation on the wires?? With low susceptibility? With low dielectric absorption?

Not so trivial.

Steve N.

What is your numerical threshold in pf/m for "low-C cables"? Probably you and DaveC are referring to different numbers.
 

Empirical Audio

Industry Expert
Oct 12, 2017
1,169
207
150
Great Pacific Northwest
www.empiricalaudio.com
What is your numerical threshold in pf/m for "low-C cables"? Probably you and DaveC are referring to different numbers.

I would say 5pF/foot or lower is low enough to perform well in all systems, both RCA and XLR terminated cables.

Steve N.
 

Empirical Audio

Industry Expert
Oct 12, 2017
1,169
207
150
Great Pacific Northwest
www.empiricalaudio.com
You are now multiplying your previously suggested typical output impedance by 20 - an extreme case that seldom happens and using a 2m cable. IMHO it only proves that in extreme situations capacity matters, but not to 99% of people using typical cables.

I have checked many cables and excepting Kubala Sosna, all were bellow 100 pF/meter. Surely I agree with you that manufacturers could supply cable capacitance. They probably choose not to do it because 99% of users would make an erroneous use of it. Evidently professional cable manufacturers supply it - it is almost mandatory for long cables and professionals need it.

I don't believe they avoid publishing for that reason. They either don't know how, don't care or don't have the equipment to do it reliably. Very few cable manufacturers include engineers I have found. They run the gamut from race car drivers to insurance salesmen to hobbyists.

I have literally never seen anyone do a computer simulation of different cables and then do the measurements to correlate and then publish it, except me. Show me one.

Steve N.
 

microstrip

VIP/Donor
May 30, 2010
20,806
4,698
2,790
Portugal
I would say 5pF/foot or lower is low enough to perform well in all systems, both RCA and XLR terminated cables.

Steve N.

Thanks, but I do not see any reason why a 5pF/foot cable should perform better than a 30 pF/foot (100 pF/m) in the audio band.
 

microstrip

VIP/Donor
May 30, 2010
20,806
4,698
2,790
Portugal
I don't believe they avoid publishing for that reason. They either don't know how, don't care or don't have the equipment to do it reliably. Very few cable manufacturers include engineers I have found. They run the gamut from race car drivers to insurance salesmen to hobbyists.

I have literally never seen anyone do a computer simulation of different cables and then do the measurements to correlate and then publish it, except me. Show me one.

Steve N.

A few years ago we had a thread on cable simulation at WBF, including examples, simulations and measurements. It was inconclusive, no measurement or simulation could show correlation with sound quality, except for clear cases of misuse of cables, or excessive equipment susceptibility.

Where can we find your papers?
 

Empirical Audio

Industry Expert
Oct 12, 2017
1,169
207
150
Great Pacific Northwest
www.empiricalaudio.com
Thanks, but I do not see any reason why a 5pF/foot cable should perform better than a 30 pF/foot (100 pF/m) in the audio band.

It's a lot like the Nyquist criteria. Makes perfect sense, but we all know that brick-wall filters at 30KHz don't sound right. I have some theories on a lot of these things, but nothing proved yet.

Steve N.
 

Empirical Audio

Industry Expert
Oct 12, 2017
1,169
207
150
Great Pacific Northwest
www.empiricalaudio.com
A few years ago we had a thread on cable simulation at WBF, including examples, simulations and measurements. It was inconclusive, no measurement or simulation could show correlation with sound quality, except for clear cases of misuse of cables, or excessive equipment susceptibility.

Where can we find your papers?

Some of them are still on my website, but not the simulations. Took most of the cable product stuff off.

http://www.empiricalaudio.com/computer-audio/technical-papers/

http://www.empiricalaudio.com/computer-audio/audio-faqs/

I would have to move the simulation plots and measurement plots from one computer to another to post here.

Steve N.
Empirical Audio
 

opus112

Well-Known Member
Feb 24, 2016
462
4
148
Zhejiang
Thanks, but I do not see any reason why a 5pF/foot cable should perform better than a 30 pF/foot (100 pF/m) in the audio band.

One potential reason is loading - say you have 5m of the high capacitance cable. That's going to be 500pF, an impedance of j16k @ 20kHz. If you happen to have an opamp driving this with a 2VRMS signal that's a peak current of almost 200uA. Enough to go beyond that opamp's classA region, depending of course on the particular opamp.

Having said that though its not uncommon for a poweramp to have at least 500pF of input capacitance for RF filtration purposes.
 

Ron Resnick

Site Co-Owner, Administrator
Jan 24, 2015
16,017
13,347
2,665
Beverly Hills, CA
What threshold is generally regarded as "low" capacitance?

Are Cardas Clear Beyond interconnects low capacitance?

Are MasterBuilt Ultra interconnects low capacitance?
 

Loheswaran

Well-Known Member
Dec 19, 2014
432
99
258
What amp + speakers?

I am using a LAvardin IT amp - it has, I am told, an unstable output stage that prefers low-capacitance cables. I know LAvardin make cables, but they are in only 3 lengths, and I would prefer cables that are not so obviously system specific - i.e., there may come a stage when I go and get another amplifier (none decided upon as yet - but certainly more powerful).

My speakers are Yamaha NS 1000m's

thanks

Lohan
 

DaveC

Industry Expert
Nov 16, 2014
3,899
2,141
495
I am using a LAvardin IT amp - it has, I am told, an unstable output stage that prefers low-capacitance cables. I know LAvardin make cables, but they are in only 3 lengths, and I would prefer cables that are not so obviously system specific - i.e., there may come a stage when I go and get another amplifier (none decided upon as yet - but certainly more powerful).

My speakers are Yamaha NS 1000m's

thanks

Lohan

Ok, as long as you stay away from Goertz-type cables (2 ribbons one atop the other), cables that use many twisted pairs, or many runs of interwoven +/- legs you'll be fine. OTOH, DNM type cable with runs that are separated a distance do have very low capacitance but don't sound as good. Most cables on the market these days are in between, which is good because neither extreme works very well imo. If you want to PM me your budget I can make specific recommendations.
 

Empirical Audio

Industry Expert
Oct 12, 2017
1,169
207
150
Great Pacific Northwest
www.empiricalaudio.com
What threshold is generally regarded as "low" capacitance?

Are Cardas Clear Beyond interconnects low capacitance?

Are MasterBuilt Ultra interconnects low capacitance?

Clear Beyond appear to have the conductors spaced too closely, and maybe even duplicated conductors doubling the capacitance. This is by observation only.

Masterbuilt seems better, just by its size and dielectrics, but it evidently uses 2 twisted pairs.

Again, even well-known manufacturers are not publishing or measuring the capacitance of their cables. Why not? If they understand the physics, they would understand the importance of this.

Steve N.
 

DaveC

Industry Expert
Nov 16, 2014
3,899
2,141
495
Clear Beyond appear to have the conductors spaced too closely, and maybe even duplicated conductors doubling the capacitance. This is by observation only.

Masterbuilt seems better, just by its size and dielectrics, but it evidently uses 2 twisted pairs.

Again, even well-known manufacturers are not publishing or measuring the capacitance of their cables. Why not? If they understand the physics, they would understand the importance of this.

Steve N.

Steve... Everyone here thinks their system is special and what they've done with it is special and if they're in the industry what they do is also special. Making statements that their system is EXTRA special and denigrating others by attacking their qualifications and whether or not they choose to share measurements is not cool. Evaluating competitors' designs without hands-on comparisons is questionable and even then... it's just plain questionable to do this at all.

I choose not to show measurements because, like many others in the industry (and not just cables), I don't believe they will be interpreted correctly and incorrect assumptions will be made about the way my product sounds. I've tried all sorts of designs and measured them and I don't agree with you about the importance of super-low capacitance.

I'd much rather people actually try out my product at home, in their own system, and compare it to other products they are interested in at their leisure.

With that said I appreciate anyone with deep technical knowledge posting here including yourself.
 

Empirical Audio

Industry Expert
Oct 12, 2017
1,169
207
150
Great Pacific Northwest
www.empiricalaudio.com
Steve... Everyone here thinks their system is special and what they've done with it is special and if they're in the industry what they do is also special. Making statements that their system is EXTRA special and denigrating others by attacking their qualifications and whether or not they choose to share measurements is not cool. Evaluating competitors' designs without hands-on comparisons is questionable and even then... it's just plain questionable to do this at all.

I choose not to show measurements because, like many others in the industry (and not just cables), I don't believe they will be interpreted correctly and incorrect assumptions will be made about the way my product sounds. I've tried all sorts of designs and measured them and I don't agree with you about the importance of super-low capacitance.

I'd much rather people actually try out my product at home, in their own system, and compare it to other products they are interested in at their leisure.

With that said I appreciate anyone with deep technical knowledge posting here including yourself.

Each to his own strategy. Too much snake oil out there is one reason why I'm selling my cable business, not that you purvey snake-oil. I have not read your site.

Steve N.
 

microstrip

VIP/Donor
May 30, 2010
20,806
4,698
2,790
Portugal
One potential reason is loading - say you have 5m of the high capacitance cable. That's going to be 500pF, an impedance of j16k @ 20kHz. If you happen to have an opamp driving this with a 2VRMS signal that's a peak current of almost 200uA. Enough to go beyond that opamp's classA region, depending of course on the particular opamp.

Having said that though its not uncommon for a poweramp to have at least 500pF of input capacitance for RF filtration purposes.

Well, I would say that if a designer used an opamp that can not supply 200uA in class A it is because he does not care about class A and thinks class AB sounds better. And 2V at 20 KHz is really atypical!

But yes, if we increase the length and the capacitance - I owned for a few weeks a famous IC cable with 980 pf/meter! - we can easily have problems with dynamic changes in the preamplifier spectral characteristics due to the changing impedance.
 

microstrip

VIP/Donor
May 30, 2010
20,806
4,698
2,790
Portugal
It's a lot like the Nyquist criteria. Makes perfect sense, but we all know that brick-wall filters at 30KHz don't sound right. I have some theories on a lot of these things, but nothing proved yet.

Steve N.

Probably other manufacturers have other theories, also not proved yet.

BTW, one of the reasons manufacturers should supply cable specifications is to allow forgery detection - the used market is filled with chinese counterfeited copies and measurements are the easiest way to spot them. I must say I always measure any used cable I get!
 

dan31

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2010
1,016
365
1,153
SF Bay
What threshold is generally regarded as "low" capacitance?

Are Cardas Clear Beyond interconnects low capacitance?

Are MasterBuilt Ultra interconnects low capacitance?

If you look at Tara Labs they have some really low capacitance (single digit) figures. I was looking at them for phono cables from turntable to the Io.
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Co-Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing