What speaker gets the bass most right?

FrantzM

Member Sponsor & WBF Founding Member
Apr 20, 2010
6,455
29
405

microstrip

VIP/Donor
May 30, 2010
20,806
4,698
2,790
Portugal
Hi

The Room is the most important aspect of music reproduction. The best gear in a bad room will provide a non-satisfying musical reproduction. There is no way around this fact.

Disregarding extreme cases - such as an all glass or completely empty room - I would not be so assertive. If you choose the proper equipment and speaker placement to complement typical living room characteristics you can get very satisfying musical reproduction.

I accept that for optimum performance you need a suitable room, but I have listened to systems sounding very satisfying in what I would consider terrible rooms. May be the next question should start another thread, but how do we establish the frontier between a good and a bad room?
 

MylesBAstor

Well-Known Member
Apr 20, 2010
11,236
81
1,725
New York City
It is theoretically possible if it meets the "more than adequate/suitable" criterion, so your question and my answer are equally irrelevant.

Kal: It was not to criticize you but people here think a $300 receiver could do handle the lower octaves of a Wilson, Kharma, Infinity, VS, etc. I would love to hear a $300 Sony receiver produce low bass in Steve's system, wouldn't you? I suppose so would Steve since he could sell his $40K Lamms and put that $37,900 towards a turntable :)
 

DonH50

Member Sponsor & WBF Technical Expert
Jun 22, 2010
3,947
306
1,670
Monument, CO
If we're talking full-range speakers I like the "tightness" of full-range planers like my Magnepans, Apogee, etc. For dynamic speakers I liked the B&W 801's (have barely heard the 800's) and Infinity IRS -- deeper but arguably not as clean as the planers. I did have a pair of Infinity QLS-II's at one time that were pretty sweet. I am currently using a pair of Rythmik subwoofers with my old Maggies and it's good enough for me...

I heard a protype system that targeted distortion by using a multiplicity (21 comes to mind) of smaller (4" - 5") cones. NOT BOSE! The system made good use of all those drivers to provide a deep, tight low end. Smaller cones, long-throw drivers, and lots of them so they stayed in their linear('ish) region.
 

microstrip

VIP/Donor
May 30, 2010
20,806
4,698
2,790
Portugal
Going back in my memories, the best bass I ever heard was at a friend HQD system - Hartley_Quad_Decca.

The bass subwoofers used Hartley 24" woofers in 500 liter double eucalyptus plywood boxes and the gap between the double boxes was filled with sand. The system used active ML2 Mark Levinson crossovers and the bass amplifier was an ML9.

The bass had no hangover, was very deep and extremely dynamic - it had the characteristics of real bass you feel at a life event. Even the "tightness" of full-range planars that Don was referring was present!
 

DonH50

Member Sponsor & WBF Technical Expert
Jun 22, 2010
3,947
306
1,670
Monument, CO
^+1 -- Forgot about the HQD system I heard in KC back in the late 70's or early 80's. Also with Levinson electronics plus lots of other goodies. In a special-purpose stereo "room" (outbuilding) all owned by a Shure VP.
 

audioguy

WBF Founding Member
Apr 20, 2010
2,794
73
1,635
Near Atlanta, GA but not too near!
I have heard different speakers produce different parts of the bass spectrum better than others. The Alexandra's mid bass slam is amazing; the bass articulation of my old Apogee Divas was incredible but the overall bass presentation of my old Dunlavy SC VI's was as good as I've ever heard.
 

MylesBAstor

Well-Known Member
Apr 20, 2010
11,236
81
1,725
New York City
If we're talking full-range speakers I like the "tightness" of full-range planers like my Magnepans, Apogee, etc. For dynamic speakers I liked the B&W 801's (have barely heard the 800's) and Infinity IRS -- deeper but arguably not as clean as the planers. I did have a pair of Infinity QLS-II's at one time that were pretty sweet. I am currently using a pair of Rythmik subwoofers with my old Maggies and it's good enough for me...

I heard a protype system that targeted distortion by using a multiplicity (21 comes to mind) of smaller (4" - 5") cones. NOT BOSE! The system made good use of all those drivers to provide a deep, tight low end. Smaller cones, long-throw drivers, and lots of them so they stayed in their linear('ish) region.

Don:

That's what I was trying to get at! Speakers tend to fall into two, somewhat mutually exclusive clubs. There are those speakers using traditional dynamic drivers like the Infinities, NOLAs, Wilson, Evolution, VS, etc. that can move a prodigous amount of air and produce outstanding dynamics, given the amp or dedicated bass amp, has the power supply. The second group of speakers, including planars like the Maggies, have a sense of snap, transient attack and detail them, that eludes the dynamic drivers, esp in the mid and upper bass. But the Maggies just never seem to move that air or have the dynamics of a Wilson. Then again, not too many speakers have the ribbon tweeter of the Maggies either :)
 

MylesBAstor

Well-Known Member
Apr 20, 2010
11,236
81
1,725
New York City
I have heard different speakers produce different parts of the bass spectrum better than others. The Alexandra's mid bass slam is amazing; the bass articulation of my old Apogee Divas was incredible but the overall bass presentation of my old Dunlavy SC VI's was as good as I've ever heard.

No different than other parts of the audio spectrum :) Estats can be frightening in the mid and upper bass regions also, on drums and standup bass :)
 

MylesBAstor

Well-Known Member
Apr 20, 2010
11,236
81
1,725
New York City
Going back in my memories, the best bass I ever heard was at a friend HQD system - Hartley_Quad_Decca.

The bass subwoofers used Hartley 24" woofers in 500 liter double eucalyptus plywood boxes and the gap between the double boxes was filled with sand. The system used active ML2 Mark Levinson crossovers and the bass amplifier was an ML9.

The bass had no hangover, was very deep and extremely dynamic - it had the characteristics of real bass you feel at a life event. Even the "tightness" of full-range planars that Don was referring was present!

Do you think you'd have the same feeling about the HQD system if you heard it today? Sometimes we look at things with rose colored glasses and if we heard it today, me thinks that it might sound horribly colored and non-linear :(
 

jadis

Well-Known Member
Apr 28, 2010
12,347
5,460
2,810
Manila, Philippines
I was always partial to the Infinity Vs, RS1bs (both with modded xovers that bring their performance to another level) and the big Genesis. Say what you want, one thing Arnie loved was bass :)

+1.

Of the big speakers that I have heard, those with at least 12" woofers, I must put the Genesis 1 system on top of my list. I've heard WAMM in Hifi Show conditions, Duntech Sovereigns in a smallish showroom, Wilson Alexandria MKI in a friend's set-up, IRS II's in another friend's place, and my vote still goes to the Genesis 1 servo system with JA 500s on the mid-hi panels and ML digital source. It did not need loud volumes to get deep bass. And the best quality bass I've heard by far.
 

Kal Rubinson

Well-Known Member
May 4, 2010
2,360
697
1,700
NYC
www.stereophile.com
Kal: It was not to criticize you but people here think a $300 receiver could do handle the lower octaves of a Wilson, Kharma, Infinity, VS, etc. I would love to hear a $300 Sony receiver produce low bass in Steve's system, wouldn't you? I suppose so would Steve since he could sell his $40K Lamms and put that $37,900 towards a turntable :)
Isn't that tangential to the topic?
 

Kal Rubinson

Well-Known Member
May 4, 2010
2,360
697
1,700
NYC
www.stereophile.com
Do you think you'd have the same feeling about the HQD system if you heard it today? Sometimes we look at things with rose colored glasses and if we heard it today, me thinks that it might sound horribly colored and non-linear :(

Yup. There should be some indexing equivalent to that used for inflation and the value of the dollar. I think the bass from my huge home-built transmission lines was the best I have ever heard but I know that I was listening to them with 1980 ears.
 

MylesBAstor

Well-Known Member
Apr 20, 2010
11,236
81
1,725
New York City
Yup. There should be some indexing equivalent to that used for inflation and the value of the dollar. I think the bass from my huge home-built transmission lines was the best I have ever heard but I know that I was listening to them with 1980 ears.

Why'd you get rid of them Kal?
 

MylesBAstor

Well-Known Member
Apr 20, 2010
11,236
81
1,725
New York City
Isn't that tangential to the topic?

Well the original post was to point out that things rarely exist in a vacuum. Take for instance my friend with the RS1bs. He tried numerous bass amps (Perraux 2150 -that served him well for some time, and a few from co's that are long gone and long gone from my memory) until he ended up with the Krell300s that sound wonderful as bass amplifiers. Had you heard his speakers with the Bryston, you would have thought the RS1bs were bass shy.
 

mep

Member Sponsor & WBF Founding Member
Apr 20, 2010
9,481
17
0
Yup. There should be some indexing equivalent to that used for inflation and the value of the dollar. I think the bass from my huge home-built transmission lines was the best I have ever heard but I know that I was listening to them with 1980 ears.

Kal-I second the love of transmission line subwoofers. I have built many pairs over the years and I still think the bass is second to none. However, the problem is always getting them to integrate with the main speakers you are using.
 

Kal Rubinson

Well-Known Member
May 4, 2010
2,360
697
1,700
NYC
www.stereophile.com
Why'd you get rid of them Kal?

It was for a long time a labor of love but, eventually, it was transformed into an obsession. I would tweak them incessantly and listen only to a restricted selection of test records. Soon, it was clear to me that I was running in circles, repeating and undoing tweaks and adjustments. In the interest of my own sanity, I gave them away to a friend who had always admired them and began a year-long quest to replace them with store-bought speakers.

Kal
 

Kal Rubinson

Well-Known Member
May 4, 2010
2,360
697
1,700
NYC
www.stereophile.com
Well the original post was to point out that things rarely exist in a vacuum. Take for instance my friend with the RS1bs. He tried numerous bass amps (Perraux 2150 -that served him well for some time, and a few from co's that are long gone and long gone from my memory) until he ended up with the Krell300s that sound wonderful as bass amplifiers. Had you heard his speakers with the Bryston, you would have thought the RS1bs were bass shy.

It is a valid point but, I think, it also points out why making a summary judgement about a speaker cannot be made reliably without understanding the context.
 

Kal Rubinson

Well-Known Member
May 4, 2010
2,360
697
1,700
NYC
www.stereophile.com
Kal-I second the love of transmission line subwoofers. I have built many pairs over the years and I still think the bass is second to none. However, the problem is always getting them to integrate with the main speakers you are using.
Well, mine were not subs but the low end of an integrated 4way system that began as an IMF TLS80 clone which was informed by the Wireless World articles of Siegfried Linkwitz.
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Co-Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing