That's fine then, but careful of absorption behind panel it deadens the sound, diffusion behind better
With that size room and distance to front wall x2 agree.
That's fine then, but careful of absorption behind panel it deadens the sound, diffusion behind better
Joel had loads of slap echo and he reduced that and his RT is 0.3 now. He has a couple of DAADs in the corner, but otherwise he has those PYT audio panels for bass
0.3s? Isn´t it too low for sound reproduction?
I guess when people do it measured they get 0.3 to 0.4 as per studios as compared to 1.8 to 2.2 for concert halls. Wonder what Mike's is, that's the right one
Hi Steve,
This has been sitting in Marc’s inbox since morning. Can you please tell me why he hasn’t posted it? This is Bill’s representation. In case you think I am name calling, you should know that he will purposefully slag off Lampi incorrectly to provoke. I have nothing against him representing correctly, but to do so incorrectly is – well - incorrect
So based on latest info:
> GG performance with 242 and most importantly full grounding system has elevated it to the TT level and sometimes beyond / sometime less depending on material
> It has really become a software format issue not hardware issue now.
> Can the GG beat the musicality and stage of the TT with a great Decca or Analogue Productions - no. But the gap with grounding and 242 is much closer.
> let's see what happens when TT grounding is sorted.
> Also, if the TT setting is not spot on, it doesn't sound as good
Can anyone please tell me how what he posted was correct?
Addendum from Bill: My Lampi just kicked my TT's ass proper. Maybe my Kleos is on it's last legs or Aesthetix IO Sig valves need replacing
Sounds like you might need an Atlas.
0.3s? Isn´t it too low for sound reproduction?
Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | Ron Resnick Site Co-Owner | Administrator | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |