Speaker Isolation - My Experience with Isoacoustics Gaia Footers

Cellcbern

VIP/Donor
Jul 30, 2015
1,222
726
585
70
Washington, DC
Replacing the spikes in my Soundocity outriggers (Soundocity made me a set of outriggers with threaded holes) with the Isoacoustics Gaia 2 footers has improved the sound of my Merlin VSM speakers. They now sound more open and articulate than with any combination of Z-feet or other spikes, with or without outriggers, on the floor or on a platform, that I've tried. Like the Townshend products the Gaia footers completely decouple the speakers from the floor, allowing them to float. See:

http://www.audiostream.com/content/isoacoustics-gaia-isolation-pucks#IVXH8EtVAjQdwbuj.97

http://www.isoacoustics.com/products/gaia-series/gaia-i/
 

DaveC

Industry Expert
Nov 16, 2014
3,899
2,141
495
I have also found IsoAcoustics to be the best speaker footers/stands I've tried as long as you have the vertical space for them. The Gaia I will be standard equipment on my speakers. :)
 

Matias

Well-Known Member
Feb 6, 2013
21
3
310
São Paulo - Brazil
Aperta demonstration videos:

 

bazelio

Well-Known Member
Sep 26, 2016
2,493
1,745
345
California
Zombie thread revival time.

Wanted to see if others' experiences with Gaia speaker footers are similar to mine. After installing a set under Marten Getz 2 speakers yesterday, the difference is certainly audible. It's a suspended floor, so that there is a difference vs the stock spikes and pucks isn't surprising. But I'm trying to decide if I like what I hear....

First off, I find that bass is cleaner and more defined as a result. There's no more bass quantity than before. Just cleaner around the edges. This is good. Second, treble seems smoother. I'm okay with this but am struggling to decide if there is some hash removed, or if it's a coloration. Third, soundstage is wider and deeper. The depth seems to push some microdetails to the back which used to be more up front. This is somewhat giving the impression of a less detailed sound overall. But here again I'm struggling to determine if this is just more accurate (perhaps less "HiFi") or if it's a slight veil. Lastly, there's no slowing of transients nor of overall PRaT. I'd seen that reported elsewhere, but don't hear it in my system.

With the GAIA in place, there's a tendency to want to listen at a higher volume. This is probably the more laid back presentation and me wanting to extract the same detail I used to hear at lower volume settings.

Overall, my thoughts are mixed. What have others experienced? Thanks.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: siddh and Matias

spiritofmusic

Well-Known Member
Jun 13, 2013
14,604
5,413
1,278
E. England
I audiotioned the Gaias v Arya Audio Revopods under my Zus. Initial impressions on the Gaias were good, but I couldn't shake the feeling that bass was a little one-note and overly full. Not a bad impression, but bass seemed a tad homogenous.

Going to the Revopods revealed my Gaias reservation to have been spot on. These footers proved to be way more neutral, agile, w no two recordings sounding alike in the bass.

The Gaias went back, the Revopods stayed.
 

spiritofmusic

Well-Known Member
Jun 13, 2013
14,604
5,413
1,278
E. England
Bazelio, I'm not a massive soundstaging man. For me, tone is my main criteria, crtically tonal discrimination btwn recordings. Euphonic bass warmth via Gais homogenised things, Revopods are the proverbial open window.

From what I recall, Gaias may have squashed the stage because of this bass character, but I can't call it. Revopods in being clearer and more open, declutter sound. And FWIW, as my sound has opened up in other respects, depth is good here (my Zus are 8' from front wall), and there is nothing limiting depth w the Revopods.

Revopods under my Zus have been one of the pivotal late changes in my system really allowing my system, obv my Zus esp, to truly blossom.
 
Last edited:

bazelio

Well-Known Member
Sep 26, 2016
2,493
1,745
345
California
Ok I was mainly asking if you heard similar depth and microdetails with both footers. If you thought one vs the other presented clearer microdetail, then that might help me determine what I'm hearing vs my stock footers.
 

spiritofmusic

Well-Known Member
Jun 13, 2013
14,604
5,413
1,278
E. England
Revopods way clearer into the music. I'm seriously considering getting another set to put under my balanced transformer, and moving my Stacore from under transformer to under my cdp.

Bazelio, there is not one area where the Revopods were not exemplary in the trial. Slam dunk, win/win etc.

The ability to open up the lower mids and upper bass, maintain articulation all the way into low bass, and not harden the treble (as some well regarded footers I've tried have done) is hugely impressive.

But tonal discrimination w transparency is the key for me. Gaias fell short here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bazelio

spiritofmusic

Well-Known Member
Jun 13, 2013
14,604
5,413
1,278
E. England
Arthur of Arya Audio a joy to deal with re ordering Revopods. Always a nice bonus.
 

DaveC

Industry Expert
Nov 16, 2014
3,899
2,141
495
I've had great results with my IsoAcoustics stands.

My experience is much as bazelio describes, with clearer bass that extends upwards through the mids to highs. Better definition, better soundstage and cleaner images.

My house was built in the mid -80's and construction was standard to low-end... It's better vs some of the cheapest modern homes but nothing special. It's fairly small and the entire house plays along with the music, especially at higher SPLs. The Iso stands reduce sympathetic resonances by a lot, far less stuff buzzes and rattles around, and I even have entire sections of my home that can resonate at certain frequencies given enough energy, this is all reduced by using the iso stands.

My experience is that any speaker will "drive" any floor unless it's decoupled, even solid concrete, and it doesn't sound good. However, any decoupling device is not perfect, it's effectiveness may vary with frequency, etc... Also every speaker is different... so I do think it's likely every decoupling device is going to sound different. I doubt even the designers will be able to explain exactly why, like much of HiFi you'll need to try and see what works for you.
 

analyzer

VIP/Donor
May 20, 2016
315
137
220
Torino - Italy
A friend of mine with a nice system (he has TAD r-1) reported that the Isoacoustics demo in Munchen was very convincing, Better results with Isoacoustics footers.
There's also a parallel thread same as this One in an Italian forum with some reports; all positive.
I'm still looking for footers below my speakers but 3200 USD dollars for two sets (Gaia Cronus 100) Is considerably over what the reason says ... and also over my wallet...
I'll stay at the Windows and take a look to this thread!
 

DaveC

Industry Expert
Nov 16, 2014
3,899
2,141
495
A friend of mine with a nice system (he has TAD r-1) reported that the Isoacoustics demo in Munchen was very convincing, Better results with Isoacoustics footers.
There's also a parallel thread same as this One in an Italian forum with some reports; all positive.
I'm still looking for footers below my speakers but 3200 USD dollars for two sets (Gaia Cronus 100) Is considerably over what the reason says ... and also over my wallet...
I'll stay at the Windows and take a look to this thread!

If you have the vertical space and don't mind the looks, the stands are the same. I use 2x sub stands per speaker for my setup, I got them when they 1st came out, right now I'd get the custom/modular aluminum ones.
 

Matias

Well-Known Member
Feb 6, 2013
21
3
310
São Paulo - Brazil
Zombie thread revival time.

Wanted to see if others' experiences with Gaia speaker footers are similar to mine. After installing a set under Marten Getz 2 speakers yesterday, the difference is certainly audible. It's a suspended floor, so that there is a difference vs the stock spikes and pucks isn't surprising. But I'm trying to decide if I like what I hear....

First off, I find that bass is cleaner and more defined as a result. There's no more bass quantity than before. Just cleaner around the edges. This is good. Second, treble seems smoother. I'm okay with this but am struggling to decide if there is some hash removed, or if it's a coloration. Third, soundstage is wider and deeper. The depth seems to push some microdetails to the back which used to be more up front. This is somewhat giving the impression of a less detailed sound overall. But here again I'm struggling to determine if this is just more accurate (perhaps less "HiFi") or if it's a slight veil. Lastly, there's no slowing of transients nor of overall PRaT. I'd seen that reported elsewhere, but don't hear it in my system.

With the GAIA in place, there's a tendency to want to listen at a higher volume. This is probably the more laid back presentation and me wanting to extract the same detail I used to hear at lower volume settings.

Overall, my thoughts are mixed. What have others experienced? Thanks.

I did welcome those changes to my system when I installed mine. :)
 

thedudeabides

Well-Known Member
Jan 16, 2011
2,126
651
1,200
Alto, NM
A friend of mine with a nice system (he has TAD r-1) reported that the Isoacoustics demo in Munchen was very convincing, Better results with Isoacoustics footers.
There's also a parallel thread same as this One in an Italian forum with some reports; all positive.
I'm still looking for footers below my speakers but 3200 USD dollars for two sets (Gaia Cronus 100) Is considerably over what the reason says ... and also over my wallet...
I'll stay at the Windows and take a look to this thread!

Isoacoustic products are available at Amazon. Money back guarantee.
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Co-Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing