This thread is up there in terms of fantastic responses as my "should I get into tape?" one from a year or so back
Thanks guys, yr responses one and all are so useful and enlightening
Re any confusion or ambiguity in my comments
Analog IMHO remains king at tone, tonal density, tonal discrimination, heft and sheer exhuberant energy
This was amply demonstrated when after a session at Audiophile Bill's covering SGM w GG and Dac8, we put Nirvana on his trusty Kuzma tt, and the tidal wave of analog substance just reinstated Lp as top dog by quite a margin
However, for the first time I was aware of real advantages the digital had that day, and at Blue58's w his SGM of the kind of anslog flow and transparency I only ever used to hear from Lp playback
Even though nothing about the SGM at either place would "fool" you that you were listening to analog, the digital seemed to run in parallel and converge w good analog
Now, my tt is admittedly nowhere near as refined as top rigs
But it's rim drive, magnetic isolated platter/feet, linear tracking air arm, gives it an accuracy and gravitas I don't hear in many other decks (no need to upset people by dissing their fave decks)
Otoh, it just doesn't do delicacy and transparency as well as these decks either
It's a little like a mix of Garrard 301 and Linn LP12, v direct, v tuneful, but lacking in many smaller cues
Ironically my room is so neutral that it's almost enhanced a drier sound, that my tt is a tad more digital like, just not as see thru as my EERA cdp
So, this could be just a case I need to get a tt w more subtlety and transparency to reinstate the superiority of vinyl over digital
Or maybe w the strides that SGM brings to the party, the tally of impvts that top digital provides has psychologically swung my tendency to prefer twds digital for the first time
Or maybe I'm trying to really say something completely different?