Clearaudio Goldfinger Statement v2

dminches

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2011
3,409
2,794
1,410
The master tape can’t be beat. Sure an RIAA EQ of that tape on vinyl sounds great and a bit different. LP sourced from the same master tape will not sound as good as the tape given reference repro gear in both instances...TT and Tape Deck.

Makes sense to me.
 

andromedaaudio

VIP/Donor
Jan 23, 2011
8,354
2,731
1,400
Amsterdam holland
As said before here, not all tapes sound good, mainly a recording problem imo.
The potential of tape is higher i think.
Vinyl can sound great to if done right.
In ease of use tape beats it easily , in variety of music vinyl beats tape easily off course.
But most older tape machines have some problems here and there so comparing Them to new vinyl and a new sota record player might not be completely fair
to do a complete rebuild is quite expensive
 

gian60

Well-Known Member
Apr 17, 2016
2,503
1,943
343
I am agree with Rockitman
I have a A80 restored with new Butterfly
Sound of tape is better than vinyl,
More body,natural,reality and dynamic
Only very high frequency I like more vinyl,in my System
I have tape same like top vinyl
Like Pink Panthers of Fone,
Whitches Brew,Paganini of Fone
Kind of Blue,Led Zeppelin and For Duke for exemple and A80 is better
I am angry with the seller of tape at 400/500 each and I don’t bought one
Keko premonition and AP
 

Ron Resnick

Site Co-Owner, Administrator
Jan 24, 2015
16,017
13,347
2,665
Beverly Hills, CA
I am agree with Rockitman
I have a A80 restored with new Butterfly
Sound of tape is better than vinyl,
More body,natural,reality and dynamic
Only very high frequency I like more vinyl,in my System
I have tape same like top vinyl
Like Pink Panthers of Fone,
Whitches Brew,Paganini of Fone
Kind of Blue,Led Zeppelin and For Duke for exemple and A80 is better
I am angry with the seller of tape at 400/500 each and I don’t bought one
Keko premonition and AP

Gian, maybe I don’t understand your post. You have a tape of For Duke?

(For Duke is an M&K direct to disc.)
 

Ron Resnick

Site Co-Owner, Administrator
Jan 24, 2015
16,017
13,347
2,665
Beverly Hills, CA
. . . Frankly, if I have not put a lot of money into tape already I really don’t have strong incentives to keep buying tapes. Tape is so dependent on ...well...tapes. Ron will realize this once he put his feet in it :D.

Kind regards,
Tang

I agree! Tape sucks! I wish I never got into tape! You are sooo right!

I feel so bad for all the audiophiles who got talked into buying machines and tapes and who now regret wasting that money that I will take off your hands for a reasonable price all of the true provenance 30ips safety masters that you now have and wish you never bought.
 

bonzo75

Member Sponsor
Feb 26, 2014
22,444
13,474
2,710
London
I have heard a lot of tape on my vinyl visits. I have seldom liked any classical performance on tape. Most of the Decca EMI type performances were in fact poor on tape. I don't know the source, possibly not the master.

Then there were some small scale performances. Some of these had great sonics, but made classical sound like a jazz band, too much in the room for my concert hall feel. The best of the small scale chamber like I heard was the Yarlung at Myles, and he had the Doshi. His tape set up was really good, and from what I understand from reading posts in that there are better transports than the Technics he had. Others mostly had the king cello or no external pre and many Studers. I also tried to compare tapes from different sources over three visits over the last few months

So without a proper compare (which I am not interested in doing on the tape front at the moment), my conclusion is that the Doshi is a must, good tapes for the music I listen to are rare, and in almost all cases I enjoyed the vinyl more, though the performances were different. It was quite clear that tape had me immediacy, dynamics, tone, bass, stage. So not for me yet.

I am still way behind on data points on tape though. So could change impressions.
 

bonzo75

Member Sponsor
Feb 26, 2014
22,444
13,474
2,710
London
Not to mention that after visits to the General last month and to audiophile bill yesterday, vinyl just got way better. Though Bill is going tape, so let's see.
 

jfrech

VIP/Donor
Sep 3, 2012
2,152
749
1,160
Austin
Destiny finally strikes. Now Four Kings, GFS, Opus1, ZYX Uni Premium and AtlasSL waiting for the American Sound.


Tang

Congratulations ! I found my GFS took at least 100 hours to really shine, it tries and tries at first...then the beauty and ease appear after a bit of time.

PS, it's a bit scary getting it out of the packaging with that long cantilever ;-)

Really looking forward to your thoughts as you mount it and listen...
 

Ron Resnick

Site Co-Owner, Administrator
Jan 24, 2015
16,017
13,347
2,665
Beverly Hills, CA
Thank you, Gian. So I guess M&K was recording off the mic feed at the same time they were cutting direct to disc?
 

Ron Resnick

Site Co-Owner, Administrator
Jan 24, 2015
16,017
13,347
2,665
Beverly Hills, CA
Which do you think sounds better in this case? The For Duke LP or the For Duke tape?
 

Mike Lavigne

Member Sponsor & WBF Founding Member
Apr 25, 2010
12,471
11,368
4,410
Thank you, Gian. So I guess M&K was recording off the mic feed at the same time they were cutting direct to disc?


when Steve McCormick (one of the recording engineers on the M&K recordings) was in my room a few years back, he told me that there was a tape made from that same mic feed at the same time that the dtd was done. he did not know at that time where those masters were, but knew they existed.
 

microstrip

VIP/Donor
May 30, 2010
20,806
4,698
2,790
Portugal
I agree! Tape sucks! I wish I never got into tape! You are sooo right!

I feel so bad for all the audiophiles who got talked into buying machines and tapes and who now regret wasting that money that I will take off your hands for a reasonable price all of the true provenance 30ips safety masters that you now have and wish you never bought.

Ron,

You should be careful on this offer. Most safety master tapes are now suffering from some kind of degradation. Many modern re-issues sound great because they have been remastered and re-equalized to bring the treble up, not just only because they are carried from original tapes. They will sound lousy just played in our systems.

I think we should separate three situations 1. The audiophile who loves the format and already owns a great collection - he has been enjoying it, adds a few tittles and keeps is machines in top conditions ;2. Those who just own a couple of tens of copies of master tapes and a top reproducer mainly for the pleasure of owning tape for its sonic qualities and enjoy them from time to time and 3. New comers!

I am part of 2 thanks to Tapeproject and eBay for several Studer's up to the A80's :). Considering what I know today about tape degradation and my experience I would not enter this branch of audiophilia in 2018, although I also love the technical part of tape reproduction and really hate the technical part of digital.

For your reference see: 2015 ARSC Guide to Audio Preservation - Sam Brylawski, Maya Lerman, Robin Pike, Kathlin Smith, editors http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub164/pub164.pdf ; http://guides.lib.uw.edu/research/audiopreservation/analog and
the classical, although now 10 years old www.richardhess.com/tape/history/HESS_Tape_Degradation_ARSC_Journal_39-2.pdf - if its graphs worried me ten years ago, imagine today...

BTW, many wise people will tell me that my ears will degrade faster than tape - but as I am guessing from photos you are considerably younger than the average WBF member!
 

ddk

Well-Known Member
May 18, 2013
6,261
4,040
995
Utah
Dear Mike,

I have been saying offline to a few friends about how my vinyl could attract me to spend time on listening without missing tapes. I have no doubt your vinyl front can sound differently better than tapes. I think this is part of the reason ddk don’t go into tape. Frankly, if I have not put a lot of money into tape already I really don’t have strong incentives to keep buying tapes. Tape is so dependent on ...well...tapes. Ron will realize this once he put his feet in it :D.

Kind regards,
Tang
I still have a couple of machines from years ago but no decent software. Unlike LP where you have access to at least 10's of thousands of excellent commercial pressings commercial tape is rubbish. I'm not into audiophile titles and the so called masters I have access to offer little in the way of music I like to justify the cost. And you're right about the level of LP playback, it's at such a high level that only the best tapes can compete.

david
 

dminches

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2011
3,409
2,794
1,410
When it comes to software availability, variety and quality LPs are unequaled.
 

microstrip

VIP/Donor
May 30, 2010
20,806
4,698
2,790
Portugal
When it comes to software availability, variety and quality LPs are unequaled.

This is a very dangerous argument - it can be used to promote digital, unless your clock stopped in the 80's ...
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Co-Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing