I have read some opinions that isolation devices are detrimental to ARC gear. Just wondering if my Ref 75Se would benefit from some form of vibration damping. I am interested to hear from anyone who has experimented with this, or anyone who has heard any other opinions about this.
I have read some opinions that isolation devices are detrimental to ARC gear. Just wondering if my Ref 75Se would benefit from some form of vibration damping. I am interested to hear from anyone who has experimented with this, or anyone who has heard any other opinions about this.
Hi newmill, From whom and where did you read such opinions? I am curious to that statement from other owners. What gear was used and what the isolation device did to change would be helpful instead of just "detrimental". I use HRS isolation bases and stands and each step has improved my Audio Research Ref5 SE. It improved the background information and lower level detail by lowering the noise floor. The changes will depend on your room, the floors, and walls. If they contribute and they all do when listening, the isolation devices help reduce that interaction to all equipment not just ARC gear.
I have read some opinions that isolation devices are detrimental to ARC gear. Just wondering if my Ref 75Se would benefit from some form of vibration damping. I am interested to hear from anyone who has experimented with this, or anyone who has heard any other opinions about this.
Any audio equipment will benefit from vibration control, it is critical. For sure your Ref 75se will be happier if sitting on a proper isolation platform, if that is what you ask. If you ask for some brands to name, when I had my Ref 610Ts amps, I have tried Acapella Fondato Silenzio and Pagode Master Reference and preferred Acapella. Then several years later, I replaced them with SRA, it performed much better.
I have found that isolation devices do not help the sound on either my Ref5SE or Ref 2 Phono. I use a fairly basic but nice looking Salamander Designs Synergy Twin shelf.
I have tried a wide variety of footers including Vibrapods, Nordost Sort Kones, spikes, etc. I have not tried Pagode or HRS stands or SRA shelves.
I have read some opinions that isolation devices are detrimental to ARC gear. Just wondering if my Ref 75Se would benefit from some form of vibration damping. I am interested to hear from anyone who has experimented with this, or anyone who has heard any other opinions about this.
I have referred before - my Audio Research REF150 sounded better on my very solid wood floor than on a Pagode Reference isolation device.
Most times I have found that isolation devices changed the sound of ARC equipment, but did not improve it.
I have referred before - my Audio Research REF150 sounded better on my very solid wood floor than on a Pagode Reference isolation device.
Most times I have found that isolation devices changed the sound of ARC equipment, but did not improve it.
Quite interesting. I have had different experiences. Perhaps it may be system dependent ie overall impact might be different. One note perhaps, proper isolation should improve overall performance of any gear, that said it should be also considered not only what it adds or strengthens but also what it deducts or removes from the sound as artifacts and distortion led issues.
Quite interesting. I have had different experiences. Perhaps it may be system dependent ie overall impact might be different. One note perhaps, proper isolation should improve overall performance of any gear, that said it should be also considered not only what it adds or strengthens but also what it deducts or removes from the sound as artifacts and distortion led issues.
We have two conflicting paths for mechanical energy in equipment - energy created in the device by power transformers and components should be drained from the equipment and vibration coming from the ground that enters the equipment. Isolation affects both paths.
There are many variables in the equation - type of floor, quality of mains, type of equipment, type of isolator and user preference. IMHO it is impossible to have general rules - each case must be taken separately.
We have two conflicting paths for mechanical energy in equipment - energy created in the device by power transformers and components should be drained from the equipment and vibration coming from the ground that enters the equipment. Isolation affects both paths.
There are many variables in the equation - type of floor, quality of mains, type of equipment, type of isolator and user preference. IMHO it is impossible to have general rules - each case must be taken separately.
Theoretically airborne vibrations are enemies of isolation devices - this type of energy should be drained to ground efficiently, otherwise it can affect sound quality. We can consider ground as an enormous damper. Some isolation devices also have high mass and can act as such.
We have two conflicting paths for mechanical energy in equipment - energy created in the device by power transformers and components should be drained from the equipment and vibration coming from the ground that enters the equipment. Isolation affects both paths.
Not just these two: there's also: vibrations caused within the equipment affecting other parts of the same equipment that needs to be addressed as well as any air-borne ones.
Not just these two: there's also: vibrations caused within the equipment affecting other parts of the same equipment that needs to be addressed as well as any air-borne ones.