Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 34

Thread: Non-Conformist Speaker Bias?

  1. #21
    [Industry Expert] Addicted to Best! DaveC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    1,597
    Quote Originally Posted by FrantzM View Post
    Great thread Dallas

    I started some time ago a thread about Audiophiles and their prejudices and to me what you are referring to are prejudices at play. Aside from Quad most of the brands here would not pass the audiophile-approved test. However much we claim of the contrary and the test would be with out ever listening to a note from those speakers. It would be assumed that these speakers would not cut the mustard against "real" audiophile brands offerings. Mea culpa: I started taking JBL seriously only after a listening session in NYC which I summarily dismissed as being too short ( although it was 2 hours and I refused to believe my ears). Might have been the 3-way version of the 4367. It was driven by a tube amp which I can't remember. The sound was glorious but I pushed it out of my mind. TO the extent of not relating to many the superb session that I had with those speakers/system. I believe we audiophiles are geared for certain brands, a certain look and "audiophile" feel. Some push our buttons some don't.
    Just as an aside next time you see a speaker branded Danley Sound , please give it some time. Listen carefully and prepare yourselves to be truly but truly amazed. First reaction could well be PA system, where you mostly find these. On serious listening you may hear many things few audiophile-approved speaker cannot begin to approach. I don't have a real way to describe but I will give it a try: "Realism". The 3-way JBL I heard in NYC had that and I am beginning to think so do the 4367 and the Geddes speakers. I have never heard the JBL M2, 4357 or Geddes speakers BTW.

    I will soon acquire nes speakers and I will not do so without listening to some Geddes and some JBL designs. I think these speakers and the aforementioned Danley designs (among many others) deserve recognition in the audiophile press and in audiophiles mindset.
    Danley holds a patent for his point source horn. It's a pretty complicated design. I too have not heard them yet but point source horn is the basic concept for the speaker I'm working on. I have a horn that covers 400-15000 Hz and I could make the horn larger and reduce the 400 Hz xo to 300 Hz or so pretty easily but 400 Hz is working out really well. It's a simpler design vs Danley and his has some advantages vs mine and vice versa.

    And yes, it does things no other speaker I've ever heard can do. The soundstage is very 3D and immersive, fine detail is not smeared by diffraction and reflection and images seem very solid and real.

    I do have dynamic floorstanders as my reference, the Pioneer S-1EX, which are imo, one of the best traditional dynamic speakers around regardless of price. So far everyone likes my speaker better, some much better, saying my speaker is far more engaging and fun to listen to. It's also fun hearing people try to describe the difference in soundstage when they have no idea what a soundstage is. But everybody notices it, it's one of the first things they say about the differences.

    The downside? It's not as good outside the sweetspot as a typical dynamic speaker. I have not been able to equal the exceptionally flat on-axis response of the Pioneers, but nobody seems to notice that.
    Industry Affiliation:
    I own ZenWave Audio
    zenwaveaudio.com
    dave@zenwaveaudio.com
    Furutech Dealer

  2. #22
    [WBF Founding Member] audioguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Near Atlanta, GA but not too near!
    Posts
    2,445
    Interesting thread. Danley, et al are not considered high end because they lack the "panache" name, style, marketing and reputation. And in all fairness, many lack the "look" of the more traditional high end speaker. Frantz, if you continue your investigation, you will be blown away by some "un-audiophile approved" speakers that sound terrific, cost less than a new car (or used car for that matter) and are every bit as good as [and many times much better than] some "audiophile approved stuff" but at a small fraction of the price. Go listen to some powered/DSP controlled speakers. Even Triad, which is considered, for all practical purposes, a home theater speaker is outstanding (but do need subs) for music. Exploring outside the bounds of the typical high end home audio speaker will really open your eyes. Things have changed.

    FWIW, a friend of mine heard the all JBL system in NY and was blown away by it, as, apparently, you were.

    Have fun!!!

    BUT, I would caution you to do some listening a high volume with some of these designs. Some which use compression drivers can sound quite dynamic, clean and powerful at "normal" volume but once you crank them up, they can be a bit edgy. Have a great time on your journey.

  3. #23
    Member Sponsor [WBF Founding Member] FrantzM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    6,441
    Audioguy

    I intend to... The Performance to cost ratio is potentially off the charts!

    We must however admit that there exist a few very unconventional in the Orthodox High End Audio segment. MBL is pretty unique and so is the Ionic Tweeter of the Acapell. What I remember from the past was the marriage of Electrostatic and horns. The Beveridge speakers work on that principle. I remember when I was a teen dreaming about this speaker. At one point during the late 2000's ( 2007?) they were resurrected but with little commercial success...
    There is also the Lansche speakers.. The ionocvac tweeter and many quite interesting designs
    Frantz
    __________________________________

    "For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring."
    —Carl Sagan
    "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction."
    — E. F. Schumacher
    (mis-attributed to A. Einstein)

  4. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by Purite Audio View Post
    Do any of those manufacturers take advertising with Stereophile?
    Keith.
    Why would that be a relevant question? Only around 50% of the products reviewed in Stereophile are from companies that advertise.

    We have reviewed many panel speakers and horns over the years, just not in recent years (other than Herb Reichert last year on a small Maggie). Our choice of what to review reflect the world as we find it, and direct radiator speakers dominate what's on offer.

    John Atkinson
    Editor, Stereophile

  5. #25
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Scandinavistan
    Posts
    37
    Quote Originally Posted by Stereoeditor View Post
    Why would that be a relevant question? Only around 50% of the products reviewed in Stereophile are from companies that advertise.

    We have reviewed many panel speakers and horns over the years, just not in recent years (other than Herb Reichert last year on a small Maggie). Our choice of what to review reflect the world as we find it, and direct radiator speakers dominate what's on offer.

    John Atkinson
    Editor, Stereophile
    Panel speakers are "audiophile approved" though. In my opinion they don't really fit in a thread on "non-conformist" speakers, they are more the exception that confirms the rule.

    Interesting thread by the way, will be following this. Never was much of a conformist...

  6. #26
    [WBF Founding Member] Gregadd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Metro DC
    Posts
    6,205
    "...our choice of what to review reflect the as we find it.."
    Stereoeditor.
    I thought we were trying to leave the world better than we found it.

    I am so tired of drivers in a box at astronomical prices designed by geniuses.
    Be civil to all, sociable to many, familiar with few, friendly to one, and enemy to none.
    Benjamin Franklin

  7. #27
    Member Sponsor Addicted to Best! dallasjustice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Dallas, Texas
    Posts
    2,090

    Question

    John,
    You've been very complimentary of Harman products over the years. You also seem to agree with how Harman measures and designs their speakers. In fact, others have pointed out that you once said the Revel Salon was the best speaker you reviewed (up to that time.)

    As you know, Harman also owns JBL who primarily designs horn/waveguide speakers. Over the last few years, JBL has released very high performance waveguide/horn designs and a totally unique dual diaphragm compression driver. Voishvillo is probably one of the best driver designers. Is JBL too pro looking? I've owned some of the best speakers you've had in YOUR room, at any price. I now own a pair of JBL 4367. It can compete with anything out there, IMO. To the extent it matters, I'm also a subscriber.

    Michael


    Quote Originally Posted by Stereoeditor View Post
    Why would that be a relevant question? Only around 50% of the products reviewed in Stereophile are from companies that advertise.

    We have reviewed many panel speakers and horns over the years, just not in recent years (other than Herb Reichert last year on a small Maggie). Our choice of what to review reflect the world as we find it, and direct radiator speakers dominate what's on offer.

    John Atkinson
    Editor, Stereophile
    MUSIC IS GOOD

  8. #28
    [WBF Founding Member] Gregadd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Metro DC
    Posts
    6,205
    Uh..He may have said it was one of the best speakers he ever measured. That's the same thing to some people.
    Be civil to all, sociable to many, familiar with few, friendly to one, and enemy to none.
    Benjamin Franklin

  9. #29
    Quote Originally Posted by dallasjustice View Post
    you once said the Revel Salon was the best speaker you reviewed (up to that time.)
    I loved the sound of the Salon2 and it also measured superbly well.

    Quote Originally Posted by dallasjustice View Post
    As you know, Harman also owns JBL who primarily designs horn/waveguide speakers. Over the last few years, JBL has released very high performance waveguide/horn designs and a totally unique dual diaphragm compression driver.
    Indeed. I have heard some great dems of the K2 9800 and we very positively reviewed the Synthesis 1400, which was designed by Greg Timbers, a few years back: http://www.stereophile.com/floorloud...ker/index.html

    Quote Originally Posted by dallasjustice View Post
    Voishvillo is probably one of the best driver designers. Is JBL too pro looking?
    Not at all, though JBL doesn't appear to make any serious effort to market these speakers to US audiophiles - Japan is, I believe, the primary market for their horn-based speakers.

    Quote Originally Posted by dallasjustice View Post
    I now own a pair of JBL 4367. It can compete with anything out there, IMO.
    I'll check it out. But it's fair to say that its distant ancestor, the JBL 4345, was one of the worst-sounding speakers I ever tried. :-)

    Quote Originally Posted by dallasjustice View Post
    To the extent it matters, I'm also a subscriber.
    Thank you.

    John Atkinson
    Editor, Stereophile
    Last edited by Stereoeditor; 03-01-2016 at 04:51 PM.

  10. #30
    Member Sponsor Addicted to Best! dallasjustice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Dallas, Texas
    Posts
    2,090
    Greg Timbers doesn't work at Harman any longer. Starting with the M2 and then the 4367, all speakers are being redesigned around the new waveguide technology and the new dual diaphragm compression drivers. So the newer models aren't even distant cousins to the old. My understanding is that the k2 will get overhauled as well. It's my understanding that the m2 and 4367 are the highest performing speakers in JBL current lineup.

    You can read more about tech used in new JBL speakers from these Voishvillo AES papers, and others:
    http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=17949
    http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=15636

    Quote Originally Posted by Stereoeditor View Post
    I loved the sound of the Salon2 and it also measured superbly well.



    Indeed. I have heard some great dems of the K2 9800 and we very positively reviewed the Synthesis 1400, which was designed by Greg Timbers, a few years back: http://www.stereophile.com/floorloud...ker/index.html



    Not at all, though JBL doesn't appear to make any serious effort to market these speakers to US audiophiles - Japan is, I believe, the primary market for their horn-based speakers.



    I'll check it out. But it's fair to say that its distant ancestor, the JBL 4345, was one of the worst-sounding speakers I ever tried. :-)



    Thank you.

    John Atkinson
    Editor, Stereophile
    MUSIC IS GOOD

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. DACs Galore and Expectation Bias
    By nc42acc in forum Digital Audio Forum: DAC, Transports, Digital Processing
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 03-29-2016, 07:03 AM
  2. ESL Bias circuit help!
    By pledgington in forum DIY Audio Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-25-2014, 10:41 AM
  3. The Half Life of Expectation Bias
    By mep in forum General Audio Forum
    Replies: 325
    Last Post: 05-25-2014, 05:26 PM
  4. Expectation Bias
    By Phelonious Ponk in forum Beer Forum
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 05-17-2014, 11:28 AM
  5. The fallacy of Expectation Bias
    By mep in forum General Audio Forum
    Replies: 156
    Last Post: 01-07-2012, 10:41 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •