Also, I don’t know why you have a problem with FFT. There are more steps in an wow & flutter percentage for representation. I mean it’s like arguing that you don’t like charts for stocks, and prefer to just read the order book of purely price and amounts…
I like FFT and use FFT spectrogram for audio restoration all the time. In my prior life I was looking FFT waterfall constantly cause our lives used to depend on those graphs.
I have no idea what you’re talking about.
Let me explain what I meant on my prior posts. FFT is a useful tool but a snapshot is not enough for wow&flutter measurements. There are two different things, one is wow&flutter the other is speed accuracy. You can check speed accuracy with a snapshot FFT (like the ones in the link you shared) but you need a predetermined time of measurement for wow&flutter evaluation (AES, DIN etc). A single revolution or one second of measurement is not enough for wow&flutter.
A turntable that runs at 34rpm with a %0.05 wow&flutter sounds better than another identical turntable which runs at 33.3rpm with %0.1 wow&flutter. Speed accuracy can easily be fixed by adjusting motor speed but it’s hard to fix bad wow&flutter. Additionally it’s very hard to detect a turntable running a little bit slow or fast but it is easy to detect good or bad wow&flutter. Lower wow&flutter enables better pace, rhythm and tone which is very noticeable with piano and violin sound. That’s why it’s more important.
I don’t say that FFT graphs in the forum you shared are unimportant or meaningless. On the contrary checking speed accuracy and bearing chatter is very important. I wanted to point out the significance of wow&flutter.