Psycho-acoustics section
- Thread starter caesar
- Start date
Doesn't the term "crazy audiophile" just about cover it?
Actually, I consider this topic to be more compelling than the oft bloody "analog vs.digital" or "objectivist vs. subjectivist" or "double blind" type stuff. The rapid cross collating computer that actually assembles and interprets the sensory event is usually given short shrift in audiophilia.
Actually, I consider this topic to be more compelling than the oft bloody "analog vs.digital" or "objectivist vs. subjectivist" or "double blind" type stuff. The rapid cross collating computer that actually assembles and interprets the sensory event is usually given short shrift in audiophilia.
Not saying i would go for it because it could cause a great furor. Nonetheless i suggest putnup a poll wih a simple yes or no to "who wants a psychoacoustic forum.
I have used a simple psychoacoustics circuit in my system for years. A pretty neat black box which requires two seperate small speakers and a amplifier. At one time I ran the 2 small speakers of my main speaker terminals and it worked fine. I later added the seperate amplifier to the mix.
There is an amazing amount of ambient info lost without the circuit in place,but only if the information is there in the recording. I don't think I would enjoy the music as much if it wasn't there, especially on live tracks.
There is an amazing amount of ambient info lost without the circuit in place,but only if the information is there in the recording. I don't think I would enjoy the music as much if it wasn't there, especially on live tracks.
Half the posts would be drive-by screamings. It would be a unique, and potentially very enlightening forum, but I seriously doubt it would ever have a chance to live up to that potential.
P
P
Similar threads
 | Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator |  | Ron Resnick Site Co-Owner | Administrator |  | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |