Mark Levinson ML 30.6 DAC, Opinions Please

J.S.

Well-Known Member
Mar 31, 2013
3
0
241
Mark Levinson ML 30.6 DAC

I have recently acquired one. It is in mint condition, not one blemish or scratch. (With original factory packaging). Currently, it is resting in its two boxes waiting to be unpacked.

So what should I expect of it? How does this older unit compare with the newer generation? Is it really about sample rate?

Honest opinions are most welcome. I'm up for a discussion!
 

LL21

Well-Known Member
Dec 26, 2010
14,411
2,509
1,448
Congrats...a great piece of equipment from what I have read. I have heard the its accompany transport, but not the DAC. Based on my experience listening to SOTA DACs of its generation, I would guess that the 30.6 continues to be a very well balanced unit...it remained the reference of at least one Stereophile Editor for many, many years. Does it have the ability to match today's sota equipment in sheer resolution? Probably not, but not being a resolution freak, I personally am much more focused on the balance of the overall unit, and I think here that could well remain quite a beautiful unit. What transport will you be using? Or will you use computer?
 

rockitman

Member Sponsor
Sep 20, 2011
7,097
412
1,210
Northern NY
The 30.6 was stereophile's reference back in the 90's until the DCS Elgar came out if my memory serves me correctly. I bet it sounds great.
 

MylesBAstor

Well-Known Member
Apr 20, 2010
11,236
81
1,725
New York City
Mark Levinson ML 30.6 DAC

I have recently acquired one. It is in mint condition, not one blemish or scratch. (With original factory packaging). Currently, it is resting in its two boxes waiting to be unpacked.

So what should I expect of it? How does this older unit compare with the newer generation? Is it really about sample rate?

Honest opinions are most welcome. I'm up for a discussion!

I think you're going to find that its resolution is limited. Strings were for digital at that time passable but edgy nonetheless. Most of all, it had that ML signature sound: dark and not very transparent.
 

J.S.

Well-Known Member
Mar 31, 2013
3
0
241
I think you're going to find that its resolution is limited. Strings were for digital at that time passable but edgy nonetheless. Most of all, it had that ML signature sound: dark and not very transparent.
Thank you for your comment. This is what I am almost expecting from what others have also expressed.

While I do have an extensive CD collection, I have no high resolution or SACD source material. My main interest remains vinyl.

My other experiences with DACs is limited. I own an Audiolab M-DAC which is being used with my transport Studer A727.

The DAC is still unopened in its box awaiting the jumble in the lounge to dissipate. (And hopefully a matching ML 31.5 transport to arrive.)
 

microstrip

VIP/Donor
May 30, 2010
20,806
4,698
2,790
Portugal
(...) While I do have an extensive CD collection, I have no high resolution or SACD source material. My main interest remains vinyl.

My other experiences with DACs is limited. I own an Audiolab M-DAC which is being used with my transport Studer A727.

The DAC is still unopened in its box awaiting the jumble in the lounge to dissipate. (And hopefully a matching ML 31.5 transport to arrive.)

Your last line killed my answer - get the matching transport . I have listened to great CD sound from this combo in the past, but the transport was really necessary. And the movement of the cover was fascinating ... Almost equivalent to the movement of the reels in a tape machine! ;)
 

JackD201

WBF Founding Member
Apr 20, 2010
12,308
1,425
1,820
Manila, Philippines
AFAIK it is capable of 24/96 and below. A usb to SPDIF converter and presto! Theres a lot of music to buy at those SRs.
 

Kingsrule

VIP/Donor
Feb 3, 2011
1,432
681
1,430
I had a couple of these along with the transport..
Compared to today's converters it'll be slow , dark and kinda veiled.
Still a cool piece. Built like no other in its day......
 

asiufy

Industry Expert/VIP Donor
Jul 8, 2011
3,711
723
1,200
San Diego, CA
almaaudio.com
The transport might be a better deal, coupled with a modern DAC, like the Bricasti or MSB Analog.


alexandre
 

Ken Newton

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2012
243
2
95
"Is it really about sample rate?"

I say, no. The native sample rate is of lesser importance, in my opinion. Other factors supersede sample rate as far as subjective sound quality is concerned.
 

CKKeung

Well-Known Member
Jun 17, 2011
3,053
3,172
1,410
Hong Kong
Mark Levinson ML 30.6 DAC
I have recently acquired one. It is in mint condition, not one blemish or scratch. (With original factory packaging). Currently, it is resting in its two boxes waiting to be unpacked.
So what should I expect of it? How does this older unit compare with the newer generation? Is it really about sample rate?
Honest opinions are most welcome. I'm up for a discussion!

Hi JS,

I previously was a Mark Levinson user in Hong Kong (26S/32/235/336).
Some of the Mark Levinson products that are more than 7 or 8 years old have aged electrolyte capacitors. They are prone to leaking which can damage the circuit boards permanently.
Here is a post in a Hong Kong HiFi forum on this issue. Even though it's in Chinese, there are a lot of photos showing the leaking capacitors & the damaged circuit boards.
http://www.review33.com/avforum/index.php?topic=88101207012248&item=&page=1
IMHO asking a technician to do an internal check is a wise move.
 

J.S.

Well-Known Member
Mar 31, 2013
3
0
241
I went with my gut feeling and that of posters.

I acquired the matching ML 31.5 (factory model) transport.

I am pleased with the results. It integrates seamlessly with the balance of my ML system.

It is not the most modern, I agree, but I am very satisfied. It matches the generation of CDs that I own. I have no need at this stage for high-res processing as my source material does not warrant it.
 

flez007

Member Sponsor
Aug 31, 2010
2,915
36
435
Mexico City
If you are more into vinyl, then you will surely like it! Give it some time....
 

Birdwatcher

Well-Known Member
May 29, 2018
218
98
135
EU
Any newer insights and experiences?
I use a 31.5, not the matching DAC, and it is on the same level as my tuned Linn Accurate DS/2 Streamer with ripped CDs, both with digital output.
Best regards
 

Nascimento

Well-Known Member
Aug 12, 2016
76
94
150
66
Brasil
For many years I had a Mark Levinson Ref system, including this DAC, the marriage between the parts was perfect, the DAC may be old but still very good! Please, now that it's been a few months, what is your opinion about DAC?
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Co-Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing