Page 9 of 11 FirstFirst 1234567891011 LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 101

Thread: the Durand Record Weight; love it!

  1. #81
    Member Sponsor [WBF Founding Member]
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    9,483
    Quote Originally Posted by rockitman View Post
    Do you really think you could evaluate audio improvments via an a/b comparo on a YouTube video ?
    Nope. But if Peter was in the room when they did the comparison with the record weight and without, Peter could have given us his impressions. He is a reviewer after all.

  2. #82
    Addicted to Best! PeterA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    North Shore of Boston
    Posts
    4,208
    Quote Originally Posted by mep View Post
    Nope. But if Peter was in the room when they did the comparison with the record weight and without, Peter could have given us his impressions. He is a reviewer after all.
    Good comment, but I think this interview is more like a press release, which is fine. It's always nice to hear from a designer about his product. And in video format, it's even better than reading an ad.

    I just attended a demo at which two reps from ultra high end companies discussed their respective designs during the introduction before the music was played. Unfortunately, they each made not too veiled comments about how their designs were much better than those from unnamed competitors, but it was pretty clear about whom they were speaking. A lot of this stuff is marketing.
    My system link on WBF: http://www.whatsbestforum.com/showth...-Sublime-Sound
    Analog: SME 30/12, SME V-12, My Sonic Labs Signature Gold, AirTight Supreme, VDH Colibri Platinum, MINT LP protractor
    Electronics: Pass Labs XA160.5 amp, XP-22 preamp, XP-25 phono, Cables: Transparent REF XL MM2,
    Speakers: Magico Q3, Magico Mini II, Essentials: Jim Smith RoomPlay, 3 Vibraplanes, Dedicated circuits

  3. #83
    Member Sponsor [WBF Founding Member]
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    9,483
    One thing that I want to clarify is that I don't mean to pick on Peter. I happen to like Peter both as a person and as a reviewer. It just would have been nice that while a table was spinning with an LP on it with a Durand tonearm set up with a mega-expensive cartridge that Peter would have said, "Hey Joel, how about dropping the arm on the record without your weight and then dropping your weight on the table so we can hear the difference?"

  4. #84
    [Industry Expert] Member Sponsor
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,236
    Quote Originally Posted by mep View Post
    One thing that I want to clarify is that I don't mean to pick on Peter. I happen to like Peter both as a person and as a reviewer. It just would have been nice that while a table was spinning with an LP on it with a Durand tonearm set up with a mega-expensive cartridge that Peter would have said, "Hey Joel, how about dropping the arm on the record without your weight and then dropping your weight on the table so we can hear the difference?"
    I'll take this as a request for "next time".

  5. #85
    Member Sponsor [WBF Founding Member]
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    9,483
    Quote Originally Posted by PeterA View Post
    Good comment, but I think this interview is more like a press release, which is fine.
    Or is it? This brings up a good point worth talking about. Should reviewers be doing press releases for manufacturers or should reviewers be covering press releases paid for by manufacturers? I think there is a not-so-subtle distinction there.

    I do think that some high-end magazines have blurred those lines by being *free* mouthpieces for the marketing department of manufacturers. TAS for one has a section in the front of some issues where they do exactly that. Do high-end rags really need to be in the business of announcing new products that are coming out from manufacturers?

    Every 4 years during the Presidential elections, both parties have their separate conventions. During these conventions, Congress suspends all ethics rules so they can make their down-and-dirty deals with their wealthy contributors from the business/corporate world. The press is kept far away from the yachts and exclusive hotels where the private parties are being thrown so they can't see what is actually going down during these events. You have to pay to play, and this is partly where the "paying" part goes down.

    I don't mean to insinuate that any reviewers have been bought by OEMs. All I'm trying to say is that magazines and reviewers should maintain their credibility by reviewing products in a manner that engenders trust in the readership. Leave the fluff pieces to the OEM's marketing department. When reviewers cover audio shows, I think each room should be treated as a mini-review which many of the reviewers do. They talk about the sound of the system and the room and give their opinions on what they heard and then pick out their favorites in different categories. I have no problem with that and I actually like that.

    A record weight that retails for $3500 deserves some very special scrutiny. Some people (even on this forum) might not have that much invested in their entire system. Many people outside of this forum damn sure don't have $3500 invested in their whole system. If you want to cover Joel Durand talking about how magnificent his $3500 record weight is, make him put it on a table and show you how magnificent his record weight is and tell me what you hear. That's all I'm sayin'.
    Last edited by mep; 06-27-2013 at 02:11 PM.

  6. #86
    I bought a 3 in 1 record weight for my Technics SL-M3. It's a 280 Gram weight, has 33 and 45 RPM strobe lines etched in it and a bubble level on top. Nicely machined from aluminum with a very nice finish and a thin rubber pad on the bottom. Cost less than 35 bucks shipped. Did I expect it to improve the sound? Heck no, I bought it because it looks cool on my table. Did it improve the sound? Not that I could tell, but it looks cool.

    BillWojo

  7. #87
    So my Clearaudio Master innovation has just been installed with a Thales Simplicity II and Anna Cartridge.

    I don't know if it needs a weight, although Clearaudio does make quite a number of them. What would anyone recommend I try, given that I would have to buy it and if it does nothing or hinders the sound quality it might become a very expensive paperweight! Rings are a no no for me for reasons of arm safety and visual aesthetics.

    Thoughts would be welcome.

    Thanks

    howie

  8. #88
    Member Sponsor Addicted to Best!
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    London
    Posts
    7,708
    Blog Entries
    10
    My Dalby Lignum Vitae D8 is for sale. Retail 4400 GBP, selling for 2k GBP, with flight case that comes with it.

    Posted from London. Selling because I don't have a TT
    Audition recordings: Zero Distortion Link; Reference Components: Zero Distortion Link; Own: Lampi GG One-day-to-get: Apogee Scintilla, or a horn (with Tenor 75 OTL ), Preamp to be fit in to suit the gain and drive the power amp. Analog: TBD

  9. #89
    Addicted to Best! XV-1's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,328
    Quote Originally Posted by howiebrou View Post
    So my Clearaudio Master innovation has just been installed with a Thales Simplicity II and Anna Cartridge.

    I don't know if it needs a weight, although Clearaudio does make quite a number of them. What would anyone recommend I try, given that I would have to buy it and if it does nothing or hinders the sound quality it might become a very expensive paperweight! Rings are a no no for me for reasons of arm safety and visual aesthetics.

    Thoughts would be welcome.

    Thanks

    howie
    Howie. How do you like the combo. Thales you know I love, but never heard anyone putting it on a Clearaudio. Very interesting.
    Source:TW Raven AC-3 - Thales Simplicity II, Exclusive P3 & P10, Technics SL-1000MK3D, Linn LP12 - Naim ARO
    Cartridges: Lyra Atlas, Etna SL, Delos, Dynavector XV-1s, Technics EPC100mk4, Ortofon A90, GM Royal, GM Classic, Denon DL-S1, ESC'd 103R, Audio Tech AT25, OC9II, Linn ESC'd Troika
    Phono Stage: TW Acustik/Thoress phono, Accuphase C-37, Esoteric E-03 EQ: ​​DEQX HDP-4
    Preamp: cj GAT, Amps: cj teflon premier 8a's, D'Agostino Momentum Stereo, Speakers: Wilson Maxx3 -Townsend Supertweeters

  10. #90
    Quote Originally Posted by XV-1 View Post
    Howie. How do you like the combo. Thales you know I love, but never heard anyone putting it on a Clearaudio. Very interesting.
    It is sounding very clean and neutral to me compared with the Avid Acutus which i have used for over 10 years and has an LP-S on it which has much more romantic and thicker sound. I havenít had enough hours on it (read;about 5) to gauge the difference. Different TT, different tonearm and different cartridge. I have no idea which is contributing more but I like what i hear so far.

    For someone who has used a screw down clamp for the last decade having nothing on the spindle feels weird to me, hence my question. It might not be necessary at all but the thread piqued my interest. The techdas one looks interesting as does the Clearaudio Statement TT weight.

    Cheers

    Howie

Page 9 of 11 FirstFirst 1234567891011 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Review: Durand Telos Tonearm
    By jazdoc in forum Tonearms
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 01-29-2014, 12:08 PM
  2. 2 Durand Telos tonearms
    By Mike Lavigne in forum Tonearms
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 04-01-2013, 10:31 AM
  3. Durand Talea 2 tonearm
    By Mike Lavigne in forum Buy and Sell Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-07-2013, 06:13 PM
  4. New Shake Weight Review ;)
    By MylesBAstor in forum Health And Fitness Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-04-2010, 07:08 PM
  5. VPI Record Weight
    By jcmusic in forum Tweaks
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 08-03-2010, 02:02 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •