FYI, Sony will be offering their new turntable/ADC with PC- and Mac-compatible DSD recording software: http://www.whathifi.com/sony/ps-hx500/review
Let's hope that Playback Designs will follow suit with the launch of the Pinot DSD ADC...
I was hoping that they would release a new mobile DSD recorder rather than another DSD DAC, but a greater choice of DSD DACs is always a good thing I guess.
At present all their recorders can only do PCM... http://www.nagraaudio.com/recorders/
Hmm.. Tascam has a free DSD editor with native DSD 256 support...
http://tascam.com/product/hi-res_editor/overview/
but their DA-3000 recorder, which can be used with outboard DSD ADCs, maxes out at DSD 128 alas.
So it seems that Pyramix is the only game in town for DSD 256 captures at this...
The above link says that the Pinot can be used as a professional DSD recording system, so maybe it will come with the necessary recording software?
But in any event, the Pyramix is a pretty popular software DAW with DSD 256 capability, so what's not to like?
In the meantime, Esoteric announced two new SACDs today... http://www.esoteric.jp/indexe.html
One would have to wonder why they continue to churn out all these SACDs if their all SACD/CD transports are all gone.
In the e-mail from dCS you quoted in post #33, Martin Rainolds said they would have used the VSOP drive for Rossini "if they could rely on the supply." I understand that he's talking about one particular Esoteric drive there. The question is, did they ask Esoteric about the drives that are...
In its newer SACD/CD players Esoteric is using new versions of VRDS Neo drives. I gather from your post that dCS specifically wanted to use a VOSP drive in their Rossini range (which they couldn't get), but still have the higher VMK drives.
Well, VOSP isn't the only SACD/CD transport out there, and we already established that it even isn't the best one.
BTW, do you know if the information about TI retiring the PCM1704 DAC is true?
https://www.facebook.com/FikusLampi/posts/1617673151797950
It will be interesting to see if TI...
The differences between a regular SACD drive and the T+A transport mechanism go beyond the aluminum case.
I wonder how it compares to Esoteric's VOSP drives (they don't look very massive themselves, do they?) ...
It's a quite fancy solution though, I don't think I've seen anything like it on any other SACD/CD player...
"The PDP 3000 HV’s high-grade SACD mechanism is fully shielded and housed in a machined solid aluminum case in order to prevent any trace of interaction between the moving parts of the...
But they weren't their top drives, right?
I'm reading in TAS that Esoteric designed the VOSP drives for "lower-priced products"
http://www.theabsolutesound.com/articles/esoteric-p-03-universal-disc-transport-and-d-03-digital-to-analog-converter/
From what I see all their current top SACD/CD...
It looked like a fatal miscommunication to me from the beginning.
BTW, I'm curious if T+A are using an off-the-shelf OEM transport in their new SACD/CD player PDP-3000HV, or is it their own design...
Yep. Two "industry members"... apparently not from Sony... ostensibly claim that Sony stopped manufacturing SACD decoding chips.
It sounds fishy to me.
+1
Sounds like a made up story to me.
Marantz has just announced a new SACD player at the High End Munich Show. It's set for September release:
http://andreweverard.com/2015/05/14/marantz-celebrates-30-years-of-special-editions-with-new-sa-14se-and-pm-14se/
Yes. And I agree that hi-res files should be cheaper, especially the PCM ones. But with new proprietary formats like MQA their prices may only go up, due to extra licensing fees typically associated with them.
Wisnon, I'm curious why Neil Young decided to end Pono's collaboration with Meridian, was he opposed to introducing yet another closed format on the market, or did Meridian's licensing fees prove a deal-breaker...
Lossless compression is nothing new. And apodizing filters are available in computer software. No need to re-buy everything in Meridian's new proprietary format.
If that is so, then it's a straw man argument, as no hi-res supporter is focused on the format to the exclusion of other aspects of recording process and audio playback.
Yes, sounds like another proprietary format from Meridian.
Didn't Neil Young contemplate using it for his Pono service at one point? Apparently, he concluded that the last thing consumers need right now is yet another proprietary format their audio players don't support.
While it's of course true that good mastering of an original recording can make the recording to sound better, re-mastering will only get you so far. There many things that can't be corrected after the recording was made, during re/mastering.
On the contrary, it's a very good analogy. Because recording engineers have much more power than mastering engineers, who have to work with the original recording, and no mastering process will make a stellar product out of the recording sabotaged by incompetent recording engineers. Ask a...